georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Dec 27, 2009
- 43,769
- 5,202
- Thread starter
- #61
I think you're right about the Bush family, but they are fairly recent players in the imperial deceits perpetrated upon the people of the Middle East. When it became obvious the Ottoman Empire was headed for defeat, France and Britain raced to grab the spoils.Tell Dick and Dubya and Bill and Hill to saddle up, militants aligned with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant have taken Mosul and Tikrit and are moving on Samarra, a one hour drive from Baghdad.
"Clashes between Iraqi Security forces and hundreds of Sunni militants aligned with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, an offshoot of al Qaeda) resulted in the capture of Mosul and Tikrit by ISIL earlier today.
"Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city, was overrun -- Iraqi forces reportedly abandoning their posts, shedding their uniforms and dropping their weapons as they fled the ISIL attacks.
"Tikrit, about 135 miles closer to Baghdad, was attacked not long after, with little resistance -- and the AFP is reporting fighting now outside Samarra, only 70 miles north of the capital city.
"The attackers overran a military base, freed hundreds of prisoners, and have seized the Turkish consulate in Mosul, capturing and holding 50 Turkish citizens. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has promised to put a halt to the advances, and called on citizens to take up arms as well."
Iraqi Insurgents Capture Northern Cities, Move Toward Baghdad - In Focus - The Atlantic
Saddam kept the lid on that cesspool. Blame the Bushes...
Bush 41 suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait via U.S. Ambassador to Iraq April Catherine Glaspie who gave Saddam the infamous "green light" to invade. Saddam invaded Kuwait; Bush invaded Iraq. Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?
Bush 43 conjured up lies to invade Iraq a second time.
The French looked at Mosul, and its oil wealth, as part of Syria; the British saw it differently and incorporated the city into Iraq.
Juan Cole has covered the Middle East since 2001, and he can tell the story better than I:
"When British Prime Minister Lloyd George met with French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau at Versailles, he was eager to push back French claims on Mosul. Since the British and their Arab allies had taken Damascus from the Ottomans, some wanted to renege on the Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916 altogether.
"President Woodrow Wilson was also there, with his ideas of self-determination for the peoples of the former empires, and he didnt want to just see an imperial grab for them.
"Clemenceau is said to have remarked that he felt he was caught between Jesus Christ and Napoleon.
"When Lloyd George met with Clemenceau, the latter is said to have asked him, 'What do you want?' Lloyd George said, 'Mosul.' Clemenceau agreed. Anything else? 'Jerusalem.'
" You shall have it.
"In return, the French were assured of Syria, which meant that Lloyd George had betrayed Sharif Hussein and his son Faisal b. Hussein, then in Damascus, for the sake of Mosuls oil.
"Afterwards it is said that Lloyd George felt he had gained these boons from Clemenceau so easily that he should have asked for more."
They always want MORE; maybe they are about to get it?
Juan Cole: The Fall of Mosul and the False Promises of Modern History - Juan Cole - Truthdig