Mitt Romney Is the 2016 Republican Front-Runner

If Obama was a Republican, you would be saying how much you love him like y'all did with Herman Caine...........:razz::razz:

If Obama believed the same things Herman Caine believed, then yes, we would. However, just calling Obama a Republican with him holding the same views he has now, then no we wouldn't.

You guys have grown a bit disenchanted with Obama because he wasn't the liberal you guys thought he was, just as Conservatives grew disenchanted with GW Bush because he wasn't the conservative we thought he was. Bush didn't leave with such a low approval rating because Liberals were upset with him, and Obama's ratings aren't falling because Conservatives are upset with him. Both of them lost their approval when people noticed that they weren't what they claimed to be.
 
Democrats, moderates, and independents elect presidents, not conservatives.

You're right in that neither are elected by their base. Of course if you're talking about Democrats "electing" their candidate through fraud, yeah, there is certainly that.

As long as you and others on the right buy into the myth of ‘voter fraud,’ such as the idiocy that it contributed to the president’s reelection, you’ll continue to lose elections.

Just as you’ll continue to lose elections by running ‘real conservative’ candidates.
 
This is not an "Onion" story.


Mitt Romney leads the Republican field among New Hampshire primary voters for 2016. Yes, you read that right.
Related Stories

Why not make it a third run for president? That's something that the former Republican nominee is definitely not thinking about right now. To put it in his own recent words: "Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no."

But that didn't stop the Virginia-based bipartisan policy firm Purple Strategies from adding his name to a recent survey for Granite State voters, which shows Romney in the lead with 25 percent support. Libertarian firebrand Rand Paul (who has strong infrastructure in New Hampshire) and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are behind with 18 percent and 17 percent support, respectively.
Mitt Romney Is the 2016 Republican Front-Runner - NationalJournal.com

Could Mitten's magic underwear prove that the third time's a charm?

:lol:

Romney would be a hell of a lot better than what's sitting in the Oval office right now. At least he has EXPERIENCE in private sector jobs--something Obama never accomplished.

But he's not going to run again--Ann Romney stated that prior to the last election--she's had it.

images


Welcome to your hope and change!
 
This is not an "Onion" story.


Mitt Romney leads the Republican field among New Hampshire primary voters for 2016. Yes, you read that right.
Related Stories

Why not make it a third run for president? That's something that the former Republican nominee is definitely not thinking about right now. To put it in his own recent words: "Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no."

But that didn't stop the Virginia-based bipartisan policy firm Purple Strategies from adding his name to a recent survey for Granite State voters, which shows Romney in the lead with 25 percent support. Libertarian firebrand Rand Paul (who has strong infrastructure in New Hampshire) and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are behind with 18 percent and 17 percent support, respectively.
Mitt Romney Is the 2016 Republican Front-Runner - NationalJournal.com

Could Mitten's magic underwear prove that the third time's a charm?

:lol:

Romney would be a hell of a lot better than what's sitting in the Oval office right now. At least he has EXPERIENCE in private sector jobs--something Obama never accomplished.

But he's not going to run again--Ann Romney stated that prior to the last election--she's had it.

images


Welcome to your hope and change!



Obama won, the country lost.

Romney would have been a great president.

I don't blame him a bit for not wanting to go through the cess pool of media and dem lies again.
 
I'm of the belief that the red state/blue state divide has become so entrenched that it's pretty darn difficult for any Republican to win the White House. The scores pretty much start at what? 243 Dem, 206 GOP? That's 27 short for the Dems to win the whole thing. 27 is fewer then what Florida has, or fewer then Ohio and Virginia together.

There just aren't many paths to the white house for the GOP nowadays, especially with Virginia trending blue. It's only going to get worse going forward with minority voters.
 
I'm of the belief that the red state/blue state divide has become so entrenched that it's pretty darn difficult for any Republican to win the White House. The scores pretty much start at what? 243 Dem, 206 GOP? That's 27 short for the Dems to win the whole thing. 27 is fewer then what Florida has, or fewer then Ohio and Virginia together.

There just aren't many paths to the white house for the GOP nowadays, especially with Virginia trending blue. It's only going to get worse going forward with minority voters.

we are divided, but the dividing line keeps moving. at the moment its moving right as more and more americans get fed up with failed socialist policies and lies from left wing leaders.

Minority voters are not as monolithic as you think they are. 2014 will be an eye opener for many dems and libs.

Reagan took every state but one, it could happen again.
 
I'm of the belief that the red state/blue state divide has become so entrenched that it's pretty darn difficult for any Republican to win the White House. The scores pretty much start at what? 243 Dem, 206 GOP? That's 27 short for the Dems to win the whole thing. 27 is fewer then what Florida has, or fewer then Ohio and Virginia together.

There just aren't many paths to the white house for the GOP nowadays, especially with Virginia trending blue. It's only going to get worse going forward with minority voters.

we are divided, but the dividing line keeps moving. at the moment its moving right as more and more americans get fed up with failed socialist policies and lies from left wing leaders.

Minority voters are not as monolithic as you think they are. 2014 will be an eye opener for many dems and libs.

Reagan took every state but one, it could happen again.

As unpopular as the Democrats get...the Republicans never seem to be better off. Just because one group is crap doesn't make the other not sh!t. The 1980's were a long time ago and it was a different world back then. Heck the 1990's were a different world compared to what we have today.
 
I'm of the belief that the red state/blue state divide has become so entrenched that it's pretty darn difficult for any Republican to win the White House. The scores pretty much start at what? 243 Dem, 206 GOP? That's 27 short for the Dems to win the whole thing. 27 is fewer then what Florida has, or fewer then Ohio and Virginia together.

There just aren't many paths to the white house for the GOP nowadays, especially with Virginia trending blue. It's only going to get worse going forward with minority voters.

That may have been true if Obama had been a bit more competent. It may be too late for them now.
 
you know whats going to be great. watching the libs circle jerk each other and attack every name that even gets mentioned as a possible republican candidate.
 
I'm of the belief that the red state/blue state divide has become so entrenched that it's pretty darn difficult for any Republican to win the White House. The scores pretty much start at what? 243 Dem, 206 GOP? That's 27 short for the Dems to win the whole thing. 27 is fewer then what Florida has, or fewer then Ohio and Virginia together.

There just aren't many paths to the white house for the GOP nowadays, especially with Virginia trending blue. It's only going to get worse going forward with minority voters.

That may have been true if Obama had been a bit more competent. It may be too late for them now.

Isn't that what was said in 2012?
 
This is not an "Onion" story.




Could Mitten's magic underwear prove that the third time's a charm?

:lol:

Romney would be a hell of a lot better than what's sitting in the Oval office right now. At least he has EXPERIENCE in private sector jobs--something Obama never accomplished.

But he's not going to run again--Ann Romney stated that prior to the last election--she's had it.

images


Welcome to your hope and change!



Obama won, the country lost.

Romney would have been a great president.

I don't blame him a bit for not wanting to go through the cess pool of media and dem lies again.
Romney blamed himself and his campaign for his loss.
 
Romney would be a hell of a lot better than what's sitting in the Oval office right now. At least he has EXPERIENCE in private sector jobs--something Obama never accomplished.

But he's not going to run again--Ann Romney stated that prior to the last election--she's had it.

images


Welcome to your hope and change!



Obama won, the country lost.

Romney would have been a great president.

I don't blame him a bit for not wanting to go through the cess pool of media and dem lies again.
Romney blamed himself and his campaign for his loss.

It was not a good campaign, he should have realized that he was going against the dem machine and the media. he should have been in full attack mode from the beginning. He tried to be honest and fair, and that does not work against democrats.
 
Obama won, the country lost.

Romney would have been a great president.

I don't blame him a bit for not wanting to go through the cess pool of media and dem lies again.
Romney blamed himself and his campaign for his loss.

It was not a good campaign, he should have realized that he was going against the dem machine and the media. he should have been in full attack mode from the beginning. He tried to be honest and fair, and that does not work against democrats.
Romney should have run as the Massachusetts moderate that he is.
 
How could he possibly be any worse that the abject failure that's in office now?

Well let's see. Last Republican President entered office with a balanced budget, a minor recession, and no wars. In his terms we were hit by terrorists to the tune of 3000 dead Americans on American soil. And at the end of his terms, 7 years later, the mastermind of that deed was still alive and well. That President started a war on the basis of lies he himself told, that cost us trillions of dollars, and over 4000 American lives, and neither we nor the Iraqies gained anything from it. After going into Afghanistan, that Republican President abandoned it to the point the Taliban became a major force once again there.

In the meantime, back at home, that President turned a once booming economy into what was almost the Second Great Republican Depression.

When President Obama was handed the baton and took office, we were losing 500,000 jobs a month, the market was headed for 6000, and it looked like '29 all over again. Today, the market is around 16,000, the jobs are coming back, in spite of the GOP doing everything in it's power to prevent any economic progress.

Abject failure, that is your tune, boy. 2008 :razz: 2012:razz:
 
How could he possibly be any worse that the abject failure that's in office now?

Well let's see. Last Republican President entered office with a balanced budget, a minor recession, and no wars. In his terms we were hit by terrorists to the tune of 3000 dead Americans on American soil. And at the end of his terms, 7 years later, the mastermind of that deed was still alive and well. That President started a war on the basis of lies he himself told, that cost us trillions of dollars, and over 4000 American lives, and neither we nor the Iraqies gained anything from it. After going into Afghanistan, that Republican President abandoned it to the point the Taliban became a major force once again there.

In the meantime, back at home, that President turned a once booming economy into what was almost the Second Great Republican Depression.

When President Obama was handed the baton and took office, we were losing 500,000 jobs a month, the market was headed for 6000, and it looked like '29 all over again. Today, the market is around 16,000, the jobs are coming back, in spite of the GOP doing everything in it's power to prevent any economic progress.

Abject failure, that is your tune, boy. 2008 :razz: 2012:razz:

go back to sleep, rocks. your rants are bullshit and you know it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top