-S-
Silver Member
- Apr 3, 2015
- 543
- 107
- Thread starter
- #601
It also didn't allow him the option of raising an army without Congress's approval and then invading a state with it.Because he knew the Constitution did not allow him that option.Home rule to enslave others
No other way to define it
Abe Lincoln had quite a bit of other ways to define it. Indeed, for quite a while he denied that he was looking to free the slaves.
The Constitution gave that power to Congress- and Congress passed the Militia Acts of 1792 and 1795- which did allow the President to call out the militias as Lincoln did
The 75,000 man army Lincoln raised was not the state militias. It was paid by the Federal government and reported to the federal government. It was a federal army raised without the permission of Congress and it was sent to invade a state of the union, which is an act of treason.
It's interesting that this 'treasonous' president you so hate is considered by the majority of Americans to one of, if not THE, best presidents we've ever had. I wonder why more people don't see it the way you do..