Chassit
Libertarian
- Dec 3, 2012
- 86
- 11
Colorado elected Democrats to run their state. They get what they deserve.
As a Colorado resident, what you say is so very sad, yet true.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Colorado elected Democrats to run their state. They get what they deserve.
Instead of free will, communists use force, coercion, and extortion....
Colorado Sheriff Says Dems Are Using Salary Threats to Pressure Sheriffs to Support Gun Control Bills | TheBlaze.com
They are demanding that the sheriffs come out in favor of a proposed law. That is quite different from demanding that they enforce an existing law. Get with the program.Instead of free will, communists use force, coercion, and extortion....
Colorado Sheriff Says Dems Are Using Salary Threats to Pressure Sheriffs to Support Gun Control Bills | TheBlaze.com
Wait. As a conservative I feel a sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him. Seems nice of them not to just fire the fella if he publicly disagrees.
Do you believe the Constitution has it laid out otherwise?
Instead of free will, communists use force, coercion, and extortion....
Colorado Sheriff Says Dems Are Using Salary Threats to Pressure Sheriffs to Support Gun Control Bills | TheBlaze.com
Wait. As a conservative I feel a sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him. Seems nice of them not to just fire the fella if he publicly disagrees.
Do you believe the Constitution has it laid out otherwise?
In the radio interview, Maketa strongly suggested that the pressure being placed on sheriffs organization bordered on extortion and should be investigated.
You're not a conservative (god almighty I hate when liberals use this lame tactic). We are not talking about "following the law" here - we are talking about being forced to help pass a bill into law that they do not believe in.
Huge.....Fucking.....Difference.... HUGE
Got it. A conservative believes the elected President does not have to face threats from Congress if he voices disagreement.
I am a liberal because I believe congress will do everything in its Constitutional power to accomplish whatever its members want.
Are are we talking conservative on beliefs here? I support gun rights. I support the death penalty. Neither was up for debate here, correct? Just is the state house could lean on local officials just a little.
Ronald Reagan ruined conservatism. He made it liberal in all respects to government power but conservative in regards to my rights in my bedroom. Don't toe the line. Think about your conservative beliefs or quit pretending you are a constitutional conservative and call yourself a bedroom conservative.
A sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him.
The law has not yet been put in front of him. His salary is being threatened for a law not yet passed.
I don't understand what you're saying about the President and Congress.
Wait. As a conservative I feel a sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him. Seems nice of them not to just fire the fella if he publicly disagrees.
Do you believe the Constitution has it laid out otherwise?
You're not a conservative (god almighty I hate when liberals use this lame tactic). We are not talking about "following the law" here - we are talking about being forced to help pass a bill into law that they do not believe in.
Huge.....Fucking.....Difference.... HUGE
Got it. A conservative believes the elected President does not have to face threats from Congress if he voices disagreement.
I am a liberal because I believe congress will do everything in its Constitutional power to accomplish whatever its members want.
Are are we talking conservative on beliefs here? I support gun rights. I support the death penalty. Neither was up for debate here, correct? Just is the state house could lean on local officials just a little.
Ronald Reagan ruined conservatism. He made it liberal in all respects to government power but conservative in regards to my rights in my bedroom. Don't toe the line. Think about your conservative beliefs or quit pretending you are a constitutional conservative and call yourself a bedroom conservative.
Got it. A conservative believes the elected President does not have to face threats from Congress if he voices disagreement.
I am a liberal because I believe congress will do everything in its Constitutional power to accomplish whatever its members want.
Are are we talking conservative on beliefs here? I support gun rights. I support the death penalty. Neither was up for debate here, correct? Just is the state house could lean on local officials just a little.
Ronald Reagan ruined conservatism. He made it liberal in all respects to government power but conservative in regards to my rights in my bedroom. Don't toe the line. Think about your conservative beliefs or quit pretending you are a constitutional conservative and call yourself a bedroom conservative.
A sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him.
The law has not yet been put in front of him. His salary is being threatened for a law not yet passed.
I don't understand what you're saying about the President and Congress.
I was setting up whoever calls this wrong fo a speech against dirty tricks. Afterall, the point here is a disagreement over dirty, legal tricks not conservative vs liberal.
It is difficult to label onself as Conservative or anything for that matter. Hypocrisy is easily called out. Now unjoin the fanboys of either party and it is easier to have a sound opinion.
Another thread that highlights what the GOP is trying to change. The GOP doesn't want to be known as the party of the stupid or the extremist.
Obviously the writer of this thread has not a clue about real communism but that didn't stop this thread from materializing.
I was setting up whoever calls this wrong fo a speech against dirty tricks.
Democrats are a coalition party. Not possible for it to be taken over. Unlike the Republican Party with the Teanuts controlling the tards.
You're not a conservative (god almighty I hate when liberals use this lame tactic). We are not talking about "following the law" here - we are talking about being forced to help pass a bill into law that they do not believe in.
Huge.....Fucking.....Difference.... HUGE
Got it. A conservative believes the elected President does not have to face threats from Congress if he voices disagreement.
I am a liberal because I believe congress will do everything in its Constitutional power to accomplish whatever its members want.
Are are we talking conservative on beliefs here? I support gun rights. I support the death penalty. Neither was up for debate here, correct? Just is the state house could lean on local officials just a little.
Ronald Reagan ruined conservatism. He made it liberal in all respects to government power but conservative in regards to my rights in my bedroom. Don't toe the line. Think about your conservative beliefs or quit pretending you are a constitutional conservative and call yourself a bedroom conservative.
And how is it "constitutional" to use force, coercion, and extortion on law enforcement to achieve assistance from your opposition?
You're not a conservative - you're using the same lame ass tactics that "Right-Winger", "JoeB.", and "Buc90" (among others) use - which is to claim your a conservative while preaching other ideologies in the absurd belief that you can make actual conservatives "see the light".![]()
Democrats are a coalition party. Not possible for it to be taken over. Unlike the Republican Party with the Teanuts controlling the tards.
It's a coalition of communists of various stripes.
Another thread that highlights what the GOP is trying to change.
The GOP doesn't want to be known as the party of the stupid or the extremist.
A sheriff must follow the laws put in front of him.
The law has not yet been put in front of him. His salary is being threatened for a law not yet passed.
I don't understand what you're saying about the President and Congress.
I was setting up whoever calls this wrong fo a speech against dirty tricks. Afterall, the point here is a disagreement over dirty, legal tricks not conservative vs liberal.
It is difficult to label onself as Conservative or anything for that matter. Hypocrisy is easily called out. Now unjoin the fanboys of either party and it is easier to have a sound opinion.
You're making completely incoherent statements. You're an idiot - and your not a conservative. Anyone who supports elected officials abusing their powers and using coercion to further their political agenda is the farthest thing from a conservative (and the farthest thing from a rational person as well).
I was setting up whoever calls this wrong fo a speech against dirty tricks. Afterall, the point here is a disagreement over dirty, legal tricks not conservative vs liberal.
It is difficult to label onself as Conservative or anything for that matter. Hypocrisy is easily called out. Now unjoin the fanboys of either party and it is easier to have a sound opinion.
You're making completely incoherent statements. You're an idiot - and your not a conservative. Anyone who supports elected officials abusing their powers and using coercion to further their political agenda is the farthest thing from a conservative (and the farthest thing from a rational person as well).
So I found this thread with the name calling and all that. No one mentioned right or wrong. Just liberal evil this or that.
So, follow me, we are just talking about government officials using legal government powers. Find a thread with no name calling or one not about hiw evil liberalism is and we can debate if the threats are right or wrong.
Still conservatively these representatives seem in the right. Anyways, it is leading to at least a partial freeze in government payrolls so this is good in the small governmmnt world.
Honest, I think I am more Constitutionally Conservative than most who go about yelling Conservative this or that. After all, Idislike what Joahn Ashcroft did to the folks of Oregon who voted in right to die. These DC loving Bush II worshipers though atruck down another state power.
Another thread that highlights what the GOP is trying to change.
The GOP doesn't want to be known as the party of the stupid or the extremist.
It doesn't?
When did that start?
Another thread that highlights what the GOP is trying to change.
The GOP doesn't want to be known as the party of the stupid or the extremist.
It doesn't?
When did that start?