Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,510
- 1,893
- 245
So in your opinion, I could fly in front of my business anything whatsoever I wanted to fly? Doesn't matter what the community thinks, doesn't matter what their democratically elected representatives did in an effort to keep the city up to certain standards? All that matters is me, me, me?
Precisely. That's what private property means. The community does not own this establishment, this man does. Thus, the man gets to decide what goes on his property.
What if the community decided that all the homeless people in the area were to be given residence at your house, a ridiculous notion to be sure, would you sit back and say, "Well, the people have spoken?" Now I only ask such a ridiculous hypothetical because you refused to answer my question about how far the "right to regulation" extends, and it seems that your criteria is simply majority rule. So are you willing to take that to its logical conclusion?
That would violate my rights, though. This man, though he pretends otherwise, is not having his rights violated. There is no right for a business to display whatever it wants to display in public view. If they were telling him he couldn't fly his flags inside his business I'd agree with you.
How isn't it? The ridiculous scenario I concocted violated your property rights, and being told he can't fly his flags violates his property rights. It's the exact same.