- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,597
- 3,605
Nor mine. But looney moonbat land has a different agenda than that of rational adults.
They're too focused on children.... they don't realize we're onto them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nor mine. But looney moonbat land has a different agenda than that of rational adults.
It was a 16 year old and based upon a true story.
I don't think the majority of them want to harm kids, but they're just so bone-headedly stubborn and stupid when it comes to supporting their tribe that they can't rationally examine situations like this.They're too focused on children.... they don't realize we're onto them
I don't think the majority of them want to harm kids, but they're just so bone-headedly stubborn and stupid when it comes to supporting their tribe that they can't rationally examine situations like this.
Idk but there's too many on here defending sexually abusing children and it's not from the right
You would think that one would post that it’s horrible. But they don’t until they’re called out on it, then after deflection doesn’t work, a few will slink off with a……
Well maybe it’s not appropriate.
I agree the book is not appropriate for young children, but it is not porn.
I know little about the book but from the descriptions, what we have here is not pornography. Graphic depictions of what sadly happens to kids far too often? Yes. Pornography? No.
A lot of times, artists themselves, are victims of abuse. They do not understand, at that point, what is the line, for what is appropriate for public display, and what is not. They believe, since they are, "artists," and it is "art," anything goes, and the sky is the limit.
However, in our society, when it comes to children, there are certain limits and restrictions polite society expects, even in the realm of the arts.
I have a friend, who herself, was raised by a single mother, who was an addict. Her mother had let a series of bfs and step dads-abuse her for alcohol and drugs.
Now that she is grown, her photography and art, tends to be. . . . a little on the risky & outrageous side. I don't think she gives it much of a thought. She has even had it reported and it has gotten her kicked off of FB & Insta, several times for posting shit that looks like it should be hanging in a Podesta brothers' home. However, she is not a pedophile, furthest thing from, best, most protective heart of children anyone could imagine. (She is now in the middle of working on her child psychology Phd.) If any conservative saw her work, they would definitely think she was a pedo though . . .
Artists, sometimes, for whatever reason, need to just get it out, and express that, to the rest of society, it is what it is. If you haven't been abused, yes, it IS pornography. I don't know what, or why, but this shit tends to repeat itself in cycles.
So I get it, I get what the artist is trying to do, why they feel they must do what they are compelled to do, by being as shocking and graphic, in trying to convey the emotions as they do, and that some of them might have, noble and pure intentions; but you must also understand its real affects on the rest of society.
Could you link some of those positive reviews? Not trying to sharpshoot you, I'd really like to read them.Her books are reviewed by site after site. All recommend it.
How dare you bring that up. Clearly these parents are all radicalized MAGA Republicans.
Not exposing your kids to LGBT+ pornography is just plain UnAmerican.
But they don’t get warnings or bans. That only happens to people calling the perverts out on their behavior by using their own words.There's just too many on this forum defending child sexual abuse. Just too many
But they don’t get warnings or bans. That only happens to people calling the perverts out on their behavior by using their own words.
Could you link some of those positive reviews? Not trying to sharpshoot you, I'd really like to read them.
Uh-huh . . .All you have to do is Google "book Identical".
Here is a hint. Don't like a book don't read it.
Realize that any time a book is banned at least ten times the amount of people go find & read it.
You can keep a young person to a narrow path, at some point most will look out side of that narrow view,
and make up there own mind. usually to discover that its not all that interesting.
That's fine, and of course this is what the battle if over.Her books are reviewed by site after site. All recommend it.