Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
more fodder...............solar power is ghey.............
Solar Energy Delivers Too Little Bang For Billions Invested - Forbes
The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
[/URL]
Hey skooks. .... See where the dude chunks a snowball on the floor of the senate?
Watch Jim Inhofe Throw a Snowball on the Senate Floor
February 26, 2015 The debate over funding for the Homeland Security Department wasn't the only thing that froze over in the Senate Thursday
Sen. Jim Inhofe, who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, tossed a snowball on the Senate floor as part of a speech expressing skepticism about the reality of climate change. The Oklahoma Republican opened by showing pictures of an igloo his daughter's family built during a snowstorm five years ago, when he said "the hysteria on global warming" began.
Then Inhofe reached into a bag he had brought with him and pulled out a robust snowball.
"Do you know what this is? It's a snowball," he said to freshman Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, who being from Louisiana may not be familiar with snow. "It's just from outside here, so it's very, very cold out, ... very unseasonable."
"Mr. President, Catch this," Inhofe said before tossing the snowball underhand. An Inhofe aide said it was caught by a page.
Watch Jim Inhofe Throw a Snowball on the Senate Floor - NationalJournal.com
ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
So does no burning fuel.ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
Burning fuel causes air pollution.
So does no burning fuel.ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
Burning fuel causes air pollution.
So?So does no burning fuel.ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
Burning fuel causes air pollution.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
More AGW k00k losing.......................
NOAA 2185 cold records broken or tied in past week 1913 Low Min Records Broken 272 tied in 7 days Climate Depot
Been telling us all winter how hot it is in America!!!
So?So does no burning fuel.ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.The point isn't whether or not more people believe in global warming but whether or not they will act to mitigate its effects. And not just global warming but pollution.
Very likely, most won't because they need to earn more and to buy more, and both needed to support middle class conveniences. The same applies to military forces, governments, and businesses, all of which rely on increasing credit and production and consumption of goods and services.
In which case, the effects of global warming will continue.
Burning fuel causes air pollution.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Without cheap energy we wouldn't be able to feed the 7 billion people living on this planet. You're arguing for mass starvation and poverty.So?So does no burning fuel.ROFL it's not just farts it's also pollution? Maybe you exhale pollution, but the stuff I exhale is called plant food.
Burning fuel causes air pollution.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Burning fuel leads to pollution, which is harmful. That will happen whether or not CO2 is plant food or other sources cause pollution.
He is arguing for the Culling of over 70 million to 1 billion people. This is a view held by many elitists and socialists. They do not want to feed these people. They want them dead!Without cheap energy we wouldn't be able to feed the 7 billion people living on this planet. You're arguing for mass starvation and poverty.So?So does no burning fuel.Burning fuel causes air pollution.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Burning fuel leads to pollution, which is harmful. That will happen whether or not CO2 is plant food or other sources cause pollution.
Without cheap energy we wouldn't be able to feed the 7 billion people living on this planet. You're arguing for mass starvation and poverty.So?So does no burning fuel.Burning fuel causes air pollution.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Burning fuel leads to pollution, which is harmful. That will happen whether or not CO2 is plant food or other sources cause pollution.
Without cheap energy we wouldn't be able to feed the 7 billion people living on this planet. You're arguing for mass starvation and poverty.So?So does no burning fuel.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Burning fuel leads to pollution, which is harmful. That will happen whether or not CO2 is plant food or other sources cause pollution.
Definitely. In fact, the reason why the population ballooned to seven billion people was because of cheap energy.
The problem is that cheap energy won't last, and combined with pollution and global warming, will lead to starvation and poverty:
Limits to Growth was right. New research shows we re nearing collapse Cathy Alexander and Graham Turner Comment is free The Guardian
Without cheap energy we wouldn't be able to feed the 7 billion people living on this planet. You're arguing for mass starvation and poverty.So?So does no burning fuel.
Yes, but that doesn't disprove what I wrote.
Burning fuel leads to pollution, which is harmful. That will happen whether or not CO2 is plant food or other sources cause pollution.
Definitely. In fact, the reason why the population ballooned to seven billion people was because of cheap energy.
The problem is that cheap energy won't last, and combined with pollution and global warming, will lead to starvation and poverty:
Limits to Growth was right. New research shows we re nearing collapse Cathy Alexander and Graham Turner Comment is free The Guardian
