They just said on CNN he got it legally and passed a background checkWhen you are able to suggest a law that would have prevented things like this, already against quite a few laws, while not infringing on my right to defend myself and my family.
The floor is yours.
Define "Infringe" with some detail.
You are wasting your breath.
No matter what you say, it will be interpreted as worst case scenario. You could say you want to limit a person to owning only 1,000 guns unless they are a gun dealer, and people on this forum will yell at you saying they need 1,001 guns to defend their home against someone trying to TP their house.
And if you have 1001 guns, and don't use them to hurt anyone or to commit any crime...what is the fucking problem...considering this guy couldn't legally own a gun because of his Dishonorable discharge, yet he still got one..dittos all the terrorists and criminals in Europe where fully automatic rifles, not AR-15s, are completely illegal...
Does a dishonorable discharge abrogate a person's right to own a gun? I thought only a convicted felon couldn't.
It was on CNN, so it must be truth.