Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,396
Those who did not belong to unions benefitted from them. 40 hour week, workplace safety, antidiscrimination.And yet most people do not belong to unions even at their peak only about 30% of workers were union membersFunny how the left goes after rich people who actually produce a tangible product but they leave the Hollywood celebrities, who flaunt their wealth, alone. Why not picket the movie moguls to demand that the union members like gaffers and grips (whatever the hell they are) get paid on the same hourly scale as the actors and see how how it works out.
Most super wealthy are not in the process of producing a tangible product
Actually, it is workers who produce a tangible product...and they have little to show for it
Workers also get paid the wage they agreed upon when they decided to sell their time to an employer.
A workers time and skill are the products they sell to an employer if the worker doesn't care enough about his product so as to improve his skills thereby making his time worth more then whose fault is that?
A worker is part of the available market. Workers percentage of generated wealth has declined in the last thirty years as more wealth has concentrated at the top
Strong unions used to fight for a bigger share but an individual on his own is not as capable
And still somehow people who weren't in unions managed to succeed
Union wages helped to set the going wage rates and benefits
If you didn't want your shop to go Union.....you had better pay
That didn't benefit me, I was born in 1965 not 1865.
If you think for one second we wouldn't have had the laws we have today with out Unions you are crazy.
.
.