MSNBC contributor who thinks more white kids will have to die so that America will be

[ScienceRocks]

Let's see every single fucking week white kids die from black thugs. You leftist don't think nothing of that but you want more.

WTF?

Blacks are blowing each other away by the thousands each year. You don't say anything about that? You people are showing how much you hate.

 

[Stephanie]

Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

oh boy, still going after someone who was FOUND INNOCENT..guess you know more about it than the juriors who sat though the evidence presented...and what does that to do with what was said by the ugly person from PmsNbc?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Analogies require higher level thinking skills, ergo....lost on some people.

Empathy for the plight of others also requires higher level thinking skills....same people lost there.

Something a idiot like you sure don't have. You think it is fine that thousands of blacks are blown away within our inner-cities. Your solution is to let them commit crimes...Now you want even more whites to die at their hands.

WTF is wrong with you?

 

[bodecea]

Analogies require higher level thinking skills, ergo....lost on some people.

Empathy for the plight of others also requires higher level thinking skills....same people lost there.

Something a idiot like you sure don't have. You think it is fine that thousands of blacks are blown away within our inner-cities. Your solution is to let them commit crimes...Now you want even more whites to die at their hands.

WTF is wrong with you?

Oh? And when have I said anything like that? Link to my comments in that regard, please.


Unless you are just a liar.....and it doesn't take higher level thinking skills to lie.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Analogies require higher level thinking skills, ergo....lost on some people.

Empathy for the plight of others also requires higher level thinking skills....same people lost there.

Something a idiot like you sure don't have. You think it is fine that thousands of blacks are blown away within our inner-cities. Your solution is to let them commit crimes...Now you want even more whites to die at their hands.

WTF is wrong with you?

Try again. You are incoherent.

 

[RoadVirus]

Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Shouldn't be surprised from a channel that hires race hacks like Sharpton and tolerates constant stupidity from perverts like Matthews.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Everything is about race with these fucking bastards. Why not just arrest criminals.

Oh'noo's we can be doing that as we smell away to take your guns away.


You people can rot in hell.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Analogies require higher level thinking skills, ergo....lost on some people.

Empathy for the plight of others also requires higher level thinking skills....same people lost there.

Something a idiot like you sure don't have. You think it is fine that thousands of blacks are blown away within our inner-cities. Your solution is to let them commit crimes...Now you want even more whites to die at their hands.

WTF is wrong with you?

Oh? And when have I said anything like that? Link to my comments in that regard, please.


Unless you are just a liar.....and it doesn't take higher level thinking skills to lie.

You're a scum bag that thinks nothing of all the black on white murders happening every day....You blow a case of self defense out of proportion for your own political gain as innocent people die.

 

[tinydancer]

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

And, I'm sorry you are so warped that you, instead of condemning violence, feel it is appropriate to defend that statement. The problem isn't white on black violence or black on white violence. The problem is violence.

Yes, I love violence.. And I want white children to die. You guys are complete idiots.

Define white.

I can't wait. Lighter skin than anyone else? Whoa geeze that's a lot of blood that has to flow.

How about black? North American, Island or Continental?

A great movie that addressed this was Mississippi Masala. I have no doubt you haven't seen it. You are still ignorant.

 

[ScienceRocks]

What's your solution for the black on black murder rate?
What's your solution for black crime?
What's your solution to handle riots?

Oh'yesss, they can do that as doing anything will hurt their feelings. This is a bad solution.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What else would you expect from cannibalistic baby killers who drink their aborted remains in Pepsi?

 

[tinydancer]

Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

 

[Mustang]

Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

oh boy, still going after someone who was FOUND INNOCENT..guess you know more about it than the juriors who sat though the evidence presented...and what does that to do with what was said by the ugly person from PmsNbc?

He wasn't found 'innocent.' Courts and juries can't make that determination. In any system (ours included) innocent people can be convicted of crimes with a guilty verdict, and people who committed crimes can be set free with a not guilty verdict.

Additionally, GZ never said he identified himself to Martin as one would expect any reasonable person would do before approaching someone in the dark. He also never claimed that he alerted Martin to his approach by saying something to the effect of "Excuse me, young man, may I speak with you for a moment?" So, we're supposed to believe that Zimmerman turned around to return to his vehicle and was then accosted/attacked? What person with a modicum of common sense believes that a person could be worried about someone who's following them when they don't know that person's intent of whether or not they're armed, but when that person who's doing the following supposedly turns around and walks away in the opposite direction, the previously worried person who was being followed then decides to attack the person who's walking away? It doesn't pass the smell test.

It's clear to me that GZ lied repeatedly about what happened and how things unfolded. So, it's not unreasonable to assume that he has every motivation to lie about how exactly the altercation began since his continuing freedom is wholly dependent on painting himself as the victim despite the fact that at every step he was escalating an unnecessary confrontation. And in all of this, we only have GZ's word as to how events unfolded? Only a fool would blindly believe his explanation especially without independent supporting evidence.

 

[Mustang]

Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Just another day at MSNBC (My Soviet News Broadcasting Company).

 

[ScienceRocks]

No one should attack or kill anyone. Why is race a factor?

If someone attacks you then you have a right to defend yourself. Do you not?

 

[Stephanie]

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

stop derailing this thread, there are at least 16 others about the case you can go rail in..thanks

 

[ScienceRocks]

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

Didn't give Trayvon the right to attack him and pound his head into the cement. That's for damn sure.

 

[Mustang]

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

Didn't give Trayvon the right to attack him and pound his head into the cement. That's for damn sure.

GZ's head was not repeatedly pounded into the cement. That's utter nonsense. Any person who's head is repeatedly slammed into the cement does NOT get up and walk away. Why would you believe such nonsense?

 

[Mustang]

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

stop derailing this thread, there are at least 16 others about the case you can go rail in..thanks

I didn't derail anything. I merely responded to your idiotic comment. Or perhaps you can clear it all up for me. Let's see. What would you call it if some guy you didn't know was specifically following you late at night? You wouldn't call that stalking you? Would that scare you if it happened?