MSNBC contributor who thinks more white kids will have to die so that America will be

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

No, we understand. We just don't agree.

That fucker is just a well educated racist as opposed to an ignorant racist. It doesn't erase the fact that he's a hypocrite. Most of the murders....

......oh fuck it. I get tired of repeating myself.

One of the reasons I stopped watching Politically Incorrect was because of Michael Eric Dyson. He's what I call an oxygen thief.

Obviously some don't, read the OP.,

I read it. He's a race-baiter, nothing more.

It's funny, MSNBC has a bunch of race-baiters employed. Some of them, like Micheal Eric Dyson and Al Sharpton even have their own shows. I remember seeing Dyson and Micheal Moore throwing around their special brand of bigotry. It was sickening to watch.
 
No one has to die to understand race. In fact, we don't need to understand race. We shouldn't be using it as any sort of classification. The Color of a person's skin is the most useless and arbitrary division that exists among us. And I am sick and tired of foolish people pretending it's somehow important.
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

I love it when hate-filled LEFTISTS come out and show your true colors.. Condoning the deaths of people by race is so.. what's the word? Familiar.. OH THE HOLOCAUST.. Condoning deaths of people by race, religion.. Wear it well sicko.

Nobody is condoning the killing of white people, you dumb ass. What the commentator was saying is that black teens are victims of violence much more than white teens; therefore, most white people can't empathize with how the black community feels about this case.
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..


Calling him sick is being too kind.

Stupid ass just threw gasoline on the fire. I am convinced that they want riots and more whiteys killed. There is no other explanation to all this race baiting and suggestions that the rioters should murder people.

When white kids die at the hands of these angry mobs, will the left sympathize with the families? Will they claim that the hateful rhetoric that incites this sort of violence is responsible? They tried to blame Palin when Gabbi Gifford was shot, for heavens sake. Now anchors tell the country that more white kids must die in order for us to understand racism. Or will it just create racial wars like this country has never seen?

The woman should be fired for encouraging murder.
 
Last edited:
How that station stays on the air is anyones guess...I'd guess the Democrat party is funding it...

it is one sick frikken station when they say thing like this..

SHUN that station people

I never watch that piece of shit..
But for the federal government's resistance to allowing a la carte selections in pay tv programming, I would dump PMS-MADCOW-NBC in a fucking New York minute.
 
GZ's head was not repeatedly pounded into the cement. That's utter nonsense. Any person who's head is repeatedly slammed into the cement does NOT get up and walk away. Why would you believe such nonsense?

So you contradict a medical examiner of 40+ years? Dr. Di Maio said the lacerations on his head were "markers of force" which indicated his head had impacted a hard surface like concrete.

You must have Google on your hazardous websites list. No wonder you're so ill-educated.

Oh, I believe he fell (and or was knocked down) and hit his head ONCE without a great deal of force behind it. But repeatedly slammed? No way. Never happened.

Also during Di Maio's testimony this picture was shown. A lump on the bottom (Zimmerman's left) and a lump on the top (Zimmerman's right).

zimmerman-top-head-0517.JPG


Believe what you want. I paid attention for three whole weeks during that trial. You didn't.
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.
His point is the same as the racist rapper Sister Souljah who produced this gem....
Question: "Even the people themselves who were perpetrating that violence, did they think that was wise? Was that a wise reasoned action?"
Souljah: "Yeah, it was wise. I mean, if black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people?… White people, this government and that mayor were well aware of the fact that black people were dying every day in Los Angeles under gang violence. So if you're a gang member and you would normally be killing somebody, why not kill a white person? Do you think that somebody thinks that white people are better, are above and beyond dying, when they would kill their own kind?"
(Quoted in David Mills (16 June 1992) "In Her Own Disputed Words; Transcript of Interview That Spawned Souljah's Story" The Washington Post.[3])
You are too blinded by your self hatred to see the statement for what it is.
Pure unabashed racism
 
Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.

stop derailing this thread, there are at least 16 others about the case you can go rail in..thanks

Derail a polarizing flame that doesn't belong in politics? Idiot much?

Project much?
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

With a typical "Fauxrageous" outcry, it all about their negative feeling about the what they hear the point is, not the actual point made by any given commentator. That might take actual thought and basic reasoning skills.

Go ahead. Circle the wagons. Spin it.
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someone is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Yeah well that pesky 5th Amendment gets in the way of your blood lust...Let me know when you decide the 5th Amendment should be repealed. Then don't go bitching about it when the shoe lands on the other foot.
 
Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

oh boy, still going after someone who was FOUND INNOCENT..guess you know more about it than the juriors who sat though the evidence presented...and what does that to do with what was said by the ugly person from PmsNbc?

He wasn't found 'innocent.' Courts and juries can't make that determination. In any system (ours included) innocent people can be convicted of crimes with a guilty verdict, and people who committed crimes can be set free with a not guilty verdict.

Additionally, GZ never said he identified himself to Martin as one would expect any reasonable person would do before approaching someone in the dark. He also never claimed that he alerted Martin to his approach by saying something to the effect of "Excuse me, young man, may I speak with you for a moment?" So, we're supposed to believe that Zimmerman turned around to return to his vehicle and was then accosted/attacked? What person with a modicum of common sense believes that a person could be worried about someone who's following them when they don't know that person's intent of whether or not they're armed, but when that person who's doing the following supposedly turns around and walks away in the opposite direction, the previously worried person who was being followed then decides to attack the person who's walking away? It doesn't pass the smell test.

It's clear to me that GZ lied repeatedly about what happened and how things unfolded. So, it's not unreasonable to assume that he has every motivation to lie about how exactly the altercation began since his continuing freedom is wholly dependent on painting himself as the victim despite the fact that at every step he was escalating an unnecessary confrontation. And in all of this, we only have GZ's word as to how events unfolded? Only a fool would blindly believe his explanation especially without independent supporting evidence.
I bet you would just drool over the prospect of repealing the "Double Jeopardy" Clause of the 5th Amendment.
Look, the man was tried in a court of law and judged by a jury of his peers. They voted not guilty. Case closed. Deal with it.
 
Sounds more like a cynical realist who has confronted an ugly truth.

Now, if you want to talk about sick? Sick is when one side of the political spectrum, en masse, defend a man accused of stalking and killing an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law even after the man repeatedly lied about what he did as well as lying about other facts surrounding what happened. After all, did conservatives take O. J. Simpson at his word? Certainly not. And that's true despite the fact that no witnesses were able to place O. J. at the scene of the crime.

Here's another example of how Zimmerman is perceived as not really having to offer any kind of a real explanation for his behavior even when other people in different circumstances would be expected to step forward and go the extra mile. I heard one of the jurors interviewed, and here's what she said in essence: She said that she thought that she thought that George's heart was in the right place. Really? And what does she base that on? Certainly it wasn't his testimony because he didn't testify. Despite the fact that it's possible for any person to be fooled, if someont is going to reach that kind of sweeping conclusion about someone's motives,they should at least get an opportunity to see and hear them questioned and cross-examined on a witness stand.

Liar you are. He didn't stalk him. You are a liar. What the hells is wrong with you?

Any man who anonymously follows an unsuspecting person in the dark (or in bright daylight, for that matter) without identifying himself is stalking that person...just like a predator.
You are a fool.
If I am walking about in my neighborhood and observe a person who I deem suspicious, you're God Damned right I am going to keep an eye on that person.
I have neighbors. Their well being IS my business. if the person enters a property, I am calling the Cops.
Contrary to the delusion by which you view this case, the right to move about wherever one wishes is not absolute.
In fact the police ask private citizens to be their eyes and ears. It is irresponsible for one to see something suspicious and not observe and report.
Let me know when this happens where you live, you do nothing and one of your neighbors becomes a victim of a violent crime. You can tell the victim " I didn't want to stalk the guy"...
Here it is....People who have no business in a given place should not be there. Period.
 
What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

I love it when hate-filled LEFTISTS come out and show your true colors.. Condoning the deaths of people by race is so.. what's the word? Familiar.. OH THE HOLOCAUST.. Condoning deaths of people by race, religion.. Wear it well sicko.

Nobody is condoning the killing of white people, you dumb ass. What the commentator was saying is that black teens are victims of violence much more than white teens; therefore, most white people can't empathize with how the black community feels about this case.

And their feelings are irrelevat to justice.
 
GZ's head was not repeatedly pounded into the cement. That's utter nonsense. Any person who's head is repeatedly slammed into the cement does NOT get up and walk away. Why would you believe such nonsense?

So you contradict a medical examiner of 40+ years? Dr. Di Maio said the lacerations on his head were "markers of force" which indicated his head had impacted a hard surface like concrete.

You must have Google on your hazardous websites list. No wonder you're so ill-educated.

Oh, I believe he fell (and or was knocked down) and hit his head ONCE without a great deal of force behind it. But repeatedly slammed? No way. Never happened.

So the eyewitness lied?

So why did the prosecution put the witness on?
 
I invite anyone reading this thread to actually listen to what Dyson says in full.

Dyson is clearly saying that if the children of white parents died in the quantities that back children die, then - and only then - would those white parents understand how illogical is the black plight. He is saying that whites simply don't understand what it is like to have their children die so regularly for no good reason.

The OP is either dishonest, or she has placed too much faith in Dear Leader, whose strategic misreadings are part of a very pernicious culture war that preys on the stupid
 
Last edited:
Sorry bout that,


1. If providence leads justice, these democrats will have their children killed senselessly, by negros who kick down their doors in the night.
2. Yeah that's justice.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Politics: Wow. MSNBC contributor says more white kids need to die to understand race in America | CainTV



Leftists are a sick group of people.. The hatred that oozes from them is almost satanic in nature, so much rage..

What he said.
"Not until and unless the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see. It’s beyond logic. It’s about rationality"

I am sorry you were too stupid to get his point.

His point is made up bullshit, 91% of blacks killed are killed by other blacks. So you keep swallowing the race bait like all the other fishes.
 
I invite anyone reading this thread to actually listen to what Dyson says in full.

Dyson is clearly saying that if the children of white parents died in the quantities that back children die, then - and only then - would those white parents understand how illogical is the black plight. He is saying that whites simply don't understand what it is like to have their children die so regularly for no good reason.

The OP is either dishonest, or she has placed too much faith in Dear Leader, whose strategic misreadings are part of a very pernicious culture war that preys on the stupid

What Dyson said was horrible. After what happened in Sandy Hook last year, and we are hoping children die so a point can be made. How appalling. Screw you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top