MagicMike
Platinum Member
Usually?Usually insurrectionists are armed....and when arrested found guilty of... wait for it... insurrection
Maybe you have some links to some of these examples?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Usually?Usually insurrectionists are armed....and when arrested found guilty of... wait for it... insurrection
Usually?
Maybe you have some links to some of these examples?
One party rule, it's the democrat goal.For any true American patriot, Jan 6 is a terrible day.
The U.S. Capitol is the cathedral of our democracy. A symbol of democracy and freedom throughout the world. And you Repug Nazis desecrated it.
You people will NEVER control the White House again. And Jan 6 is the #1 reason why. So suck on that.
It's the result of the fascist Republican Party making itself unelectable....and Jan 6 has made you Nazis unelectable.One party rule, it's the democrat goal.
The Supreme Court is not going to support the insurrection bullshit.Actually, this is what I'm saying.
.....Judges figure out what ruling they want and then go find the legal reasoning to justify it.
Constitutional interpretation being more art than science, the document's sometimes vague language and failure to foresee all contingencies (who could have predicted a human wrecking ball like Trump) gives the Justices quite a bit of latitude in making their rulings.
IOW, despite the historical record showing it was the intent of the 14th's authors that the VP and prez be included among "officer(s) of the United States,"
“While nothing in Representative McKee’s speeches mentions why his express reference to the Presidency was removed,” the court ruled, “his public pronouncements leave no doubt that his subsequent draft proposal still sought to ensure that rebels had absolutely no access to political power.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...mail&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_daily202
despite,
Historical precedent also confirms that a criminal conviction is not required for an individual to be disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. No one who has been formally disqualified under Section 3 was charged under the criminal “rebellion or insurrection” statute (18 U.S.C. § 2383) or its predecessors. This fact is consistent with Section 3’s text, legislative history, and precedent, all of which make clear that a criminal conviction for any offense is not required for disqualification. Section 3 is not a criminal penalty, but rather is a qualification for holding public office in the United States that can be and has been enforced through civil lawsuits in state courts, among other means.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...eports/past-14th-amendment-disqualifications/
despite due process arguments being manifestly made moot by virtue of the SCOTUS being the third court that will consider the evidence of the case beginning in one of CO's lower courts,
Before a lower court last month, lawyers made wide-ranging arguments during closing arguments (after 5 days of testimony and the introduction of evidence), grappling over the ins and outs of specific language in the 14th Amendment and the extent to which Trump’s actions related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol amounted to insurrection.
GOP in uproar after Colorado court bars Trump from state ballot - Roll Call
despite the mountain of documentary and testimonial evidence of Trump's participation in an insurrection
![]()
GovInfo
Official Publications from the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
www.govinfo.gov
there should be no question in anyone's mind the the conservative Justices and their clerks are busily researching a legal rationale to justify the ruling they want.
So, perhaps more important, is the next ruling they will make on Trump's bizarre claim of presidential immunity. Then Jack Smith can go about the business of proving the grounds on which Don's disqualification from the ballot should have been upheld.
Apparently if you point out election fraud/interference you are a violent insurrectionist and if you don't agree with one party removing opposing candidates from the the ballot, you are a Trump slave.Meaning what? That anyone who dares to tell the truth about Don must be destroyed?
Which "political rivals" are you speaking of?And if we flipped parties, MagicMike and the left wing hypocrites would all suddenly get that is what they meant, literal arms against the country, not they were putting their political rivals in prison like the Democrats are doing
This is hilarious. Talk about drama queens... pitiful propaganda.
You’re trying to connect point A to point D.Trump ordered them to Stop the Steal
He lied to them and told them Mike Pence could overturn the results
He lied to them and told them Congress could overturn the States
That is the misinformation the Republican Mob used to storm the Capitol
Naw! They just bombed it...lolTit-for-tat doesn't work.
Democrats have never been guilty of storming The Capitol.
You’re trying to connect point A to point D.
No proof, just writing fiction. Grow up
Democrat tyranny, it's all the rage.It's the result of the fascist Republican Party making itself unelectable....and Jan 6 has made you Nazis unelectable.
It's a major reason why the Republicans didn't do nearly as well as expected in 2022 and it's why you all are going to lose badly in 2024.
America should cry
Sad day for our Democracy
Explain how violence against capitol police out front and broken windows were a “threat” to Democracy. No hyperbole or connecting dot A to FI saw videos of Capitol Police being savagely beaten
I saw videos of them breaking windows and storming the halls.
The fact that some later members of the Republican Mob were able to wander the Capitol does not negate that
You're just mad because the Leftists didn't have the balls to try it...lolAmerica should cry
Sad day for our Democracy
liewinger is just a liar, always has been.You’re trying to connect point A to point D.
No proof, just writing fiction. Grow up
But, when Leftists do it, you call it free speech...lolI saw videos of Capitol Police being savagely beaten
I saw videos of them breaking windows and storming the halls.
The fact that some later members of the Republican Mob were able to wander the Capitol does not negate that