MSNBC: No Evidence of Collusion

toomuchtime_

Gold Member
Dec 29, 2008
20,007
4,934
280
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell responds to Hillary Clinton's accusation that the Russians never could have known how to effectively deploy the files they stole from her campaign without help from "Americans." Mitchell, a longtime friend of the Clintons, describes this accusation as a "conspiracy theory" without evidence.

"She doesn't have the evidence, but she obviously is hoping that this is what Robert Mueller and what the Congressional committee's going to do," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.

Editor's note: Clinton also accused WikiLeaks of timing the release of the first batch of John Podesta's emails to coincide with the release of the "Grab 'Em By The P***Y" tape. It should be well known for those who witnessed the events of 2016 that the WikiLeaks dump was not timed to coincide with the Access Hollywood tape, but in fact it was the other way around. It was well-known at the time that WikiLeaks was planning to dump files about the Clinton campaign 'by the end of the week.' Certain parties had been sitting on the Access Hollywood tape for more than a year, before releasing it on the Friday afternoon which ended the week in which WikiLeaks had promised to publish. For Clinton's assumption to be true, WikiLeaks must have been aware of the Access Hollywood tape before it was released, which seems impossible. On the other hand, WikiLeaks publicly stated many times that they were going to release a bombshell about the Clinton campaign, which would have served as a warning to release a counter-tape.

Andrea Mitchell: No Evidence For Hillary's "Conspiracy Theory" That Russia Must Have Had Help From "Americans"

Even MSNBC understands how preposterous Obama's Russia hoax is.
 
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
 
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
 
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
 
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell responds to Hillary Clinton's accusation that the Russians never could have known how to effectively deploy the files they stole from her campaign without help from "Americans." Mitchell, a longtime friend of the Clintons, describes this accusation as a "conspiracy theory" without evidence.

"She doesn't have the evidence, but she obviously is hoping that this is what Robert Mueller and what the Congressional committee's going to do," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.

Editor's note: Clinton also accused WikiLeaks of timing the release of the first batch of John Podesta's emails to coincide with the release of the "Grab 'Em By The P***Y" tape. It should be well known for those who witnessed the events of 2016 that the WikiLeaks dump was not timed to coincide with the Access Hollywood tape, but in fact it was the other way around. It was well-known at the time that WikiLeaks was planning to dump files about the Clinton campaign 'by the end of the week.' Certain parties had been sitting on the Access Hollywood tape for more than a year, before releasing it on the Friday afternoon which ended the week in which WikiLeaks had promised to publish. For Clinton's assumption to be true, WikiLeaks must have been aware of the Access Hollywood tape before it was released, which seems impossible. On the other hand, WikiLeaks publicly stated many times that they were going to release a bombshell about the Clinton campaign, which would have served as a warning to release a counter-tape.

Andrea Mitchell: No Evidence For Hillary's "Conspiracy Theory" That Russia Must Have Had Help From "Americans"

Even MSNBC understands how preposterous Obama's Russia hoax is.
You lied about Andrea Mitchell being a friend of the Clintons. She has been a Hillary hater for several years now. Dick Morris was also a friend of the Clintons you know?
But it sounded cooler for your thread title to type MSNBC instead of Andrea Mitchell. Your intention was to make people believe that MSNBC issued a news report stating the lack of collusion.
 
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Andrea Mitchell is not a liberal Network. She's a person obsessed with Hillary's fake email scandal during the election period. But your intention is to pretend that MSNBC news issued a news report, instead of Andrea Mitchell issuing an opinion.
 
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell responds to Hillary Clinton's accusation that the Russians never could have known how to effectively deploy the files they stole from her campaign without help from "Americans." Mitchell, a longtime friend of the Clintons, describes this accusation as a "conspiracy theory" without evidence.

"She doesn't have the evidence, but she obviously is hoping that this is what Robert Mueller and what the Congressional committee's going to do," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.

Editor's note: Clinton also accused WikiLeaks of timing the release of the first batch of John Podesta's emails to coincide with the release of the "Grab 'Em By The P***Y" tape. It should be well known for those who witnessed the events of 2016 that the WikiLeaks dump was not timed to coincide with the Access Hollywood tape, but in fact it was the other way around. It was well-known at the time that WikiLeaks was planning to dump files about the Clinton campaign 'by the end of the week.' Certain parties had been sitting on the Access Hollywood tape for more than a year, before releasing it on the Friday afternoon which ended the week in which WikiLeaks had promised to publish. For Clinton's assumption to be true, WikiLeaks must have been aware of the Access Hollywood tape before it was released, which seems impossible. On the other hand, WikiLeaks publicly stated many times that they were going to release a bombshell about the Clinton campaign, which would have served as a warning to release a counter-tape.

Andrea Mitchell: No Evidence For Hillary's "Conspiracy Theory" That Russia Must Have Had Help From "Americans"

Even MSNBC understands how preposterous Obama's Russia hoax is.
You lied about Andrea Mitchell being a friend of the Clintons. She has been a Hillary hater for several years now. Dick Morris was also a friend of the Clintons you know?
But it sounded cooler for your thread title to type MSNBC instead of Andrea Mitchell. Your intention was to make people believe that MSNBC issued a news report stating the lack of collusion.


And none of this will make Hillary the Hag president.

Run her in 2020 please?
 
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Andrea Mitchell is not a liberal Network. She's a person obsessed with Hillary's fake email scandal during the election period. But your intention is to pretend that MSNBC news issued a news report, instead of Andrea Mitchell issuing an opinion.
I don't intend to say that. Andrea can speak for herself and i won't imply that she speaks for all of MSNBC. So take MSNBC out of my comment and my point still stands...
 
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
 
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
What do you think your proving by posting a few links. If I do the same showing accusations of Clintons child porn operation or if I quote some of the many oitragest quotes from conservative radio hosts. Does that validate the same point?
 
Day after day the voices of those declaring the false accusations against Trump continue to get louder.

Only die-hard delusional butt-hurt snowflakes who can't accept Hillary lost the election on her own, led by the Conspiracy Theory-Pushing Queen of Denial, still refuse to accept it yet.

I, personally, hope the DNC continues to push the evidence-less claims all the way to 2018 so America finally gets sick and tired of their BS and take MORE Congressional seats from them.

I, personally, hope Hillary continues to push the Conspiracy Theory through 2020...from her jail cell. :p
 
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
any of these NOT an anonymous source?
 
Day after day the voices of those declaring the false accusations against Trump continue to get louder.

Only die-hard delusional butt-hurt snowflakes who can't accept Hillary lost the election on her own, led by the Conspiracy Theory-Pushing Queen of Denial, still refuse to accept it yet.

I, personally, hope the DNC continues to push the evidence-less claims all the way to 2018 so America finally gets sick and tired of their BS and take MORE Congressional seats from them.

I, personally, hope Hillary continues to push the Conspiracy Theory through 2020...from her jail cell. :p
You even have Jesse Walters who is as right wing partisan as you can get admitting that the Russian collusion thing is starting to worry him. It's not just the snowflakes
 
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
Links. Sausage.
 
Slade, you started it by questioning his thread. And you claimed you didn't really see anyone claiming collusion. I proved you're wrong by posting threads or posts by the left for you. Own up. This isn't about anything else.
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
What do you think your proving by posting a few links. If I do the same showing accusations of Clintons child porn operation or if I quote some of the many oitragest quotes from conservative radio hosts. Does that validate the same point?
 
That has nothing to do with anything. He said the left here isn't stating there is collusion. I showed him there is here.
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
any of these NOT an anonymous source?
 
Slade, you started it by questioning his thread. And you claimed you didn't really see anyone claiming collusion. I proved you're wrong by posting threads or posts by the left for you. Own up. This isn't about anything else.
You must be willfully blind, then.

Evidence of Collusion
Congressman starts Comrade-Putin collusion web site
Russia Trump collusion, the next Watergate
What Collusion? Pick a Trump associate and see for yourself...
R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....
And many, many more.
How old are you? Durp? Lol.
I don't see him complaining, just setting the record straight
So you've posted many Democratic leaders, intelligence agency leaders and now the top liberal news network all stating that there is no evidence of collusion... so what are you complaining about?
Ok durp, who is he setting the record straight for? I don't hear hardly anybody saying that there is evidence of collusion so is he just speaking to the wingnuts?
What do you think your proving by posting a few links. If I do the same showing accusations of Clintons child porn operation or if I quote some of the many oitragest quotes from conservative radio hosts. Does that validate the same point?
Little liar boy strikes again... I said I didn't see anybody except for a fraction of partisan wingnuts claiming there was evidence of collusion. Nice try though.
 
Day after day the voices of those declaring the false accusations against Trump continue to get louder.

Only die-hard delusional butt-hurt snowflakes who can't accept Hillary lost the election on her own, led by the Conspiracy Theory-Pushing Queen of Denial, still refuse to accept it yet.

I, personally, hope the DNC continues to push the evidence-less claims all the way to 2018 so America finally gets sick and tired of their BS and take MORE Congressional seats from them.

I, personally, hope Hillary continues to push the Conspiracy Theory through 2020...from her jail cell. :p
You even have Jesse Walters who is as right wing partisan as you can get admitting that the Russian collusion thing is starting to worry him. It's not just the snowflakes
Thanks for demonstrating that there are still die-hard hold-outs who will never accept the truth.

Slade probably still believes Gore won, too.

:p
 
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell responds to Hillary Clinton's accusation that the Russians never could have known how to effectively deploy the files they stole from her campaign without help from "Americans." Mitchell, a longtime friend of the Clintons, describes this accusation as a "conspiracy theory" without evidence.

"She doesn't have the evidence, but she obviously is hoping that this is what Robert Mueller and what the Congressional committee's going to do," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.

Editor's note: Clinton also accused WikiLeaks of timing the release of the first batch of John Podesta's emails to coincide with the release of the "Grab 'Em By The P***Y" tape. It should be well known for those who witnessed the events of 2016 that the WikiLeaks dump was not timed to coincide with the Access Hollywood tape, but in fact it was the other way around. It was well-known at the time that WikiLeaks was planning to dump files about the Clinton campaign 'by the end of the week.' Certain parties had been sitting on the Access Hollywood tape for more than a year, before releasing it on the Friday afternoon which ended the week in which WikiLeaks had promised to publish. For Clinton's assumption to be true, WikiLeaks must have been aware of the Access Hollywood tape before it was released, which seems impossible. On the other hand, WikiLeaks publicly stated many times that they were going to release a bombshell about the Clinton campaign, which would have served as a warning to release a counter-tape.

Andrea Mitchell: No Evidence For Hillary's "Conspiracy Theory" That Russia Must Have Had Help From "Americans"

Even MSNBC understands how preposterous Obama's Russia hoax is.
L
So your made up mind opinion is golden?
Andrea is better than all the CIA experts.?
I get it, that's what you want to hear.
You have never done any high level research obviously. It takes years to weigh everything.
Don't just spout the latest one liner that agrees with you
 
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell responds to Hillary Clinton's accusation that the Russians never could have known how to effectively deploy the files they stole from her campaign without help from "Americans." Mitchell, a longtime friend of the Clintons, describes this accusation as a "conspiracy theory" without evidence.

"She doesn't have the evidence, but she obviously is hoping that this is what Robert Mueller and what the Congressional committee's going to do," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.

Editor's note: Clinton also accused WikiLeaks of timing the release of the first batch of John Podesta's emails to coincide with the release of the "Grab 'Em By The P***Y" tape. It should be well known for those who witnessed the events of 2016 that the WikiLeaks dump was not timed to coincide with the Access Hollywood tape, but in fact it was the other way around. It was well-known at the time that WikiLeaks was planning to dump files about the Clinton campaign 'by the end of the week.' Certain parties had been sitting on the Access Hollywood tape for more than a year, before releasing it on the Friday afternoon which ended the week in which WikiLeaks had promised to publish. For Clinton's assumption to be true, WikiLeaks must have been aware of the Access Hollywood tape before it was released, which seems impossible. On the other hand, WikiLeaks publicly stated many times that they were going to release a bombshell about the Clinton campaign, which would have served as a warning to release a counter-tape.

Andrea Mitchell: No Evidence For Hillary's "Conspiracy Theory" That Russia Must Have Had Help From "Americans"

Even MSNBC understands how preposterous Obama's Russia hoax is.
L
So your made up mind opinion is golden?
Andrea is better than all the CIA experts.?
I get it, that's what you want to hear.
You have never done any high level research obviously. It takes years to weigh everything.
Don't just spout the latest one liner that agrees with you
Ummm....the CIA has already stated THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION...

:p
 

Forum List

Back
Top