MSNBC Panel: Little Hope’ Zimmerman Will Be Convi

IOW

Zimmerman will be lynched by Holder.

How dare Zimmerman defend himself against one of Holder's people.

The only person who claims Zimmerman was defending himself is... Zimmerman.

Oh, none of Trayvon's DNA on Zimmerman or his gun, and none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails or on his clothes.

you did not refute my point

and there is physical evidence

The lynch mob simply lies about everything that doesn't fit the narrative.
 
Guy, I have something called "a job". I don't have time to sit down and watch this trial all day like you apparently do.

But frankly, other than the Defense throwing a bunch of shit against the wall, we still have a live white guy (oh, excuse me, "White Hispanic") and a dead black kid. And no physical evidence to back up his story.

What we have is a self-serving story from the killer, who has already proven himself to be a liar.

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Sadly, Joe doesn't want to look at the actual facts or evidence in this case.
He has admitted that the only fact that counts is that Trayvon is dead, and Zimmerman killed him....there for Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
You can come to this conclusion as long as you don't admit there is other evidence to the contrary.
Joe is running on emotion....no more than emotion. I quit debating with him because he can't get past his emotion.

Likewise, I'm just scrolling past their walls of text. They know nothing about the law, and they are unteachable.
 
This says it all about, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN!




Recognize this guy? Even Fox News doesn't use this photo



Do you know who this is?

It is Little Trayvon Martin...! At 17 yrs of age.


For those of us who thought we were well informed and weren't.....quite the realty check.
That old adage applies here: "there are two sides to every story."

We don't always get the truth from the media.
One of my favorite rants - the liberal controlled media, television news, newspapers, magazines, radio; all continue to show 12 year old Trayvon; NOT 17 year old Trayvon.

In reality "little Trayvon" at the time of his death stood almost 6'2" tall and weighed 175 muscular pounds. He had numerous run-ins with authorities (both at school and local police), had been stopped and almost arrested two days before his death for smacking a bus driver in the face, because the driver refused to let him ride for free.
He was released because the driver was told not to press charges by the bus company and to continue on his route.

When "little Trayvon" was suspended at school it was not only because he tried to bring a little marijuana in with him, he was in possession of wedding rings and other jewelry, watches, etc. that he said he "found" along with a large screwdriver while on the way to school that day. The jewelry was turned over to the Police by the school.

I am not trying to say this was a good shooting.

I am not trying to say this kid deserved to die.
I am saying the media in the USA is controlled by liberals who twist and distort what you see and hear in order for you to see things their way.

Not a single paper has printed RECENT photos of this kid, because it would not keep your interest in this case.

Not a single paper will admit that this kid was a marijuana dealer.
His friends on Facebook all say he had the "best plants". Not a single paper will show you any of his recent photos where he shows off a mouthful of gold teeth and all of his tattoos. Not a single newspaper will tell the news like it really is ...and NOT how they want you to think it is... President Obama looked at the FIVE year old photo the media chose to show the Nation and said, "If I had a son...he would look like Trayvon.." So from that comment should I assume you did
not bother to look for the facts in this shooting..
or should I assume you want a son who is a 17 year old drug dealing, gold teethed, tattooed thug whose name on one of his facebook profiles was "Wild Nigga" who 'finds" jewelry and burglary tools on the way to school? A fair and impartial news media in the USA ? One that does not follow the preconceived liberal agenda? One that is NOT looking to further divide this already fractured Nation?I didn't compose this. I'm only passing it on.Never trust the news media for WHOLE TRUTH and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.


Trayvon at 12 yrs of age.. how he was shown to us!

Why exactly do you folks need to lie about shit?

irony.png
 
The only person who claims Zimmerman was defending himself is... Zimmerman.

Oh, none of Trayvon's DNA on Zimmerman or his gun, and none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails or on his clothes.

you did not refute my point

and there is physical evidence

You had a point?

I actually admire Holder's restraint. He allowed the State of Florida a chance to make this case right when he easily had jurisdiction based on the bad behavior of the Police Department and district attorney.

Still hoping they get it right, but not much hope.

The only time Holder restrains himself is when it comes to pursuing justice for anyone who isn't a black thug.
 
You had a point?

I actually admire Holder's restraint. He allowed the State of Florida a chance to make this case right when he easily had jurisdiction based on the bad behavior of the Police Department and district attorney.

Still hoping they get it right, but not much hope.

or, so it is not about justice, it is all about lynching?

Well no.

It's about the realization that a racist state like Florida may not be able to administer proper justice.

True, it doesn't administer the Holder brand of justice properly. That's the kind where blacks get off Scott free and whites get lynched.
 
or, so it is not about justice, it is all about lynching?

Well no.

It's about the realization that a racist state like Florida may not be able to administer proper justice.

oh, so lynching an innocent man is "proper justice" in your racist mind?

A state with proper justice mandates that all non-blacks must not fight off a black attacker. Blacks have a right to beat up anyone they want, even if they beat them to death. The obligation is that the victim must accept it without fighting back.
 
Guy, I have something called "a job". I don't have time to sit down and watch this trial all day like you apparently do.

But frankly, other than the Defense throwing a bunch of shit against the wall, we still have a live white guy (oh, excuse me, "White Hispanic") and a dead black kid. And no physical evidence to back up his story.

What we have is a self-serving story from the killer, who has already proven himself to be a liar.

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Sadly, Joe doesn't want to look at the actual facts or evidence in this case.
He has admitted that the only fact that counts is that Trayvon is dead, and Zimmerman killed him....therefore, Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
You can come to this conclusion as long as you don't admit there is other evidence to the contrary.
Joe is running on emotion....no more than emotion. I quit debating with him because he can't get past his emotion.

I loathe such black and white reasoning, Joe has turned base thinking into an art form. I have him on ignore for the most part, I peek at his posts every now and then.
 
Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Sadly, Joe doesn't want to look at the actual facts or evidence in this case.
He has admitted that the only fact that counts is that Trayvon is dead, and Zimmerman killed him....therefore, Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
You can come to this conclusion as long as you don't admit there is other evidence to the contrary.
Joe is running on emotion....no more than emotion. I quit debating with him because he can't get past his emotion.

I loathe such black and white reasoning, Joe has turned base thinking into an art form. I have him on ignore for the most part, I peek at his posts every now and then.

Joe puts the STU in stupid.
 
When Zimmerman Walks Free, Al Sharpton will still be fighting to free the slaves. Maybe he has forgotten that Abe Lincoln already took care of that around the time Joe Biden was in second grade?
 
[

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise it a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Actually, the Defense threw a bunch of shit at the wall, and the cops are boobs.

Sorry, a few owies don't prove that a guy who had trained 3 days a week at a mixed martial arts place was in any real danger.

Where's Martin's DNA on his person? Where is his NDA on Martin? That's physical evidence of a scuffle.

Now, I know why you gun fetishist want Zimmerman to be innocent when he is obviously guilty- (HELLOOOOOO, Trayvon is still dead!) He's living the what you guys dream about, "excercising" your second amendment right.
 

Nope. This isn't a hate crime. This is a case applicable to Florida Laws and Statutes only. Shows how your liberal mind works though.
 
Last edited:
[

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise it a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Actually, the Defense threw a bunch of shit at the wall, and the cops are boobs.

Sorry, a few owies don't prove that a guy who had trained 3 days a week at a mixed martial arts place was in any real danger.

Where's Martin's DNA on his person? Where is his NDA on Martin? That's physical evidence of a scuffle.

Now, I know why you gun fetishist want Zimmerman to be innocent when he is obviously guilty- (HELLOOOOOO, Trayvon is still dead!) He's living the what you guys dream about, "excercising" your second amendment right.


Dude, he was not RAPING him, so DNA evidence is almost irrelevant - especially considering the circumstances.

Do you at least know when DNA evidence is paramount? and what it is? seems like you are just repeating the syllables without understanding the meaning.
 
[

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise it a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Actually, the Defense threw a bunch of shit at the wall, and the cops are boobs.

Sorry, a few owies don't prove that a guy who had trained 3 days a week at a mixed martial arts place was in any real danger.

Where's Martin's DNA on his person? Where is his NDA on Martin? That's physical evidence of a scuffle.

Now, I know why you gun fetishist want Zimmerman to be innocent when he is obviously guilty- (HELLOOOOOO, Trayvon is still dead!) He's living the what you guys dream about, "excercising" your second amendment right.


Dude, he was not RAPING him, so DNA evidence is almost irrelevant - especially considering the circumstances.

Do you at least know when DNA evidence is paramount? and what it is? seems like you are just repeating the syllables without understanding the meaning.

LOL. Owned.

:clap2:
 
[

Joe, I have something called "a brain". I take the time to exercise it a great deal more often than you. I don't have time to sit around and ignore reality all day like you apparently do.

The defense has completely blown the prosecution out of the water. You say there is no physical evidence? Did you not see the photographs of Zimmerman's injuries? Did you see all of the witnesses corroborate his claim?

No. Of course you didn't. I'm sorry to have taken you away from your "job". :lol:

Actually, the Defense threw a bunch of shit at the wall, and the cops are boobs.

Sorry, a few owies don't prove that a guy who had trained 3 days a week at a mixed martial arts place was in any real danger.

Where's Martin's DNA on his person? Where is his NDA on Martin? That's physical evidence of a scuffle.

Now, I know why you gun fetishist want Zimmerman to be innocent when he is obviously guilty- (HELLOOOOOO, Trayvon is still dead!) He's living the what you guys dream about, "excercising" your second amendment right.


Dude, he was not RAPING him, so DNA evidence is almost irrelevant - especially considering the circumstances.

Do you at least know when DNA evidence is paramount? and what it is? seems like you are just repeating the syllables without understanding the meaning.

Unless Zimmerman clawed Trayvon with his fingernails, why would there be any Zimmerman DNA on Trayvon? I've never heard that they could lift DNA of another person from your skin. I would imagine your own DNA would so contaminate the sample that it would be difficult to detect DNA from another person.

Joe keeps talking about throwing shit against the wall to see if it sticks, but almost everything he posts is an example of exactly that.
 
Last edited:
or, so it is not about justice, it is all about lynching?

Well no.

It's about the realization that a racist state like Florida may not be able to administer proper justice.

True, it doesn't administer the Holder brand of justice properly. That's the kind where blacks get off Scott free and whites get lynched.

Which white person has been "lynched"?

And I am talking under the classic definition of lynched.
 
[

Sadly, Joe doesn't want to look at the actual facts or evidence in this case.
He has admitted that the only fact that counts is that Trayvon is dead, and Zimmerman killed him....therefore, Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
You can come to this conclusion as long as you don't admit there is other evidence to the contrary.
Joe is running on emotion....no more than emotion. I quit debating with him because he can't get past his emotion.

Guy, no emotion at all.

You could present me with this kind of evidence, but it's all based on trusting the word of Zimmerman, a proven liar. In fact, you have no evidence that isn't based on trusting ZImmerman's word.

If Zimmerman started the fight, he's guilty of murder. Or at the least, manslaughter.

This guy is not worth a race riot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top