Moonglow
Diamond Member
Don't crack...Really more of a token laugh funny rating for post 56 to courteously acknowledge...yea I hear you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't crack...Really more of a token laugh funny rating for post 56 to courteously acknowledge...yea I hear you.
Don't crack...Really more of a token laugh funny rating for post 56 to courteously acknowledge...yea I hear you.
You need some slow time?Don't crack...Really more of a token laugh funny rating for post 56 to courteously acknowledge...yea I hear you.
Did daddy not love you?
"ronny ray gun"????oh please! she not near as old a ronny ray gun..Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
Hilary wins regardless of who the Republicans nominate. Bush is the most likely winner of the nomination. A Hillary Bush match up is not likely to inspire anyone. However, Hillary's years of experience, popularity with women, and the fact that she is a know quantity will make her a winner. An ex-Senator, 8 years in the Whitehouse, ex-Secretary of State that's on a first name basis with most world leaders and Washington power brokers is going to be hard to beat.I wonder how it feels to be reduced to hoping that your opponent slips up or gets ill?
Here is the biggest problem that the GOP field has:
The Clinton's are pretty astute politicians. And...they get it. Listen to Bill speaking about the economy. Pay close attention to what Sec. Clinton emphasizes on the campaign trail. My educated guess is that her prepared comments will be overwhelmingly focused on the economy and the middle class. When asked....she will discuss the social issues.....but she'll quickly turn the discussion back to the economy.
She is more hawkish than most of the GOP field....so it will be hard for any of them to gain points there. Unless they are willing to alienate their base, that is.
I'm laughing at Rubio and Paul....trying to saddle Sec. Clinton with the "Obama economy"......because just about every sane American knows that it is far better than when he took office. It's not a winner for you idiots.
Whaddya think, thereisnospoon and The Rabbi ? Did I contribute? Ya losers.
Surely not since it was used in the 1980's..."ronny ray gun"????oh please! she not near as old a ronny ray gun..Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
That got old around March, 1965.
Except for the marginal Secretary of State performance, she failed to Obama of all people with the credentials you listed.Hilary wins regardless of who the Republicans nominate. Bush is the most likely winner of the nomination. A Hillary Bush match up is not likely to inspire anyone. However, Hillary's years of experience, popularity with women, and the fact that she is a know quantity will make her a winner. An ex-Senator, 8 years in the Whitehouse, ex-Secretary of State that's on a first name basis with most world leaders and Washington power brokers is going to be hard to beat.I wonder how it feels to be reduced to hoping that your opponent slips up or gets ill?
Here is the biggest problem that the GOP field has:
The Clinton's are pretty astute politicians. And...they get it. Listen to Bill speaking about the economy. Pay close attention to what Sec. Clinton emphasizes on the campaign trail. My educated guess is that her prepared comments will be overwhelmingly focused on the economy and the middle class. When asked....she will discuss the social issues.....but she'll quickly turn the discussion back to the economy.
She is more hawkish than most of the GOP field....so it will be hard for any of them to gain points there. Unless they are willing to alienate their base, that is.
I'm laughing at Rubio and Paul....trying to saddle Sec. Clinton with the "Obama economy"......because just about every sane American knows that it is far better than when he took office. It's not a winner for you idiots.
Whaddya think, thereisnospoon and The Rabbi ? Did I contribute? Ya losers.
Too funny!Hillary won't be the Democrat candidate.
Remember, this is post-constitutional America and there is no reason George Soros can't eliminate the middle man and just buy the job for himself.
You need some slow time?
Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
McCain was how old?![]()
Who woulda thunk? I mean it is MSNBC, but still, 86%?
86% of what? Legal or Illegal Americans?
86% of People Who Have Nothing Better To Do Today.86% of what? Legal or Illegal Americans?
they should take a poll of maybe about 20,000 palmetto bugs in Florida. I actually think that at least 50% will vote against her.86% of People Who Have Nothing Better To Do Today.86% of what? Legal or Illegal Americans?
Of course they represent a portion of the poll but I doubt that it was a huge factor. Republicans, for the most part, are not going to be voting in strong numbers on an MSNBC poll. They are also less likely to be on the internet voting in polls in general - democrats are for more active online than republicans are.Come on guys, on MSNBC? This is like polling Daily Kos readership.
Yes it is and?
Do you think that for one small microsecond every one of the democrat naysayers in this poll that ‘wouldn’t vote for Hillary would not go vote for her in the main?
Don’t bet on it – they will cast a vote for Hillary in a hot second should she get the nomination and she is a sure fire nominee without real opposition.
Where are her opponents right now? Is she a shoe in – no, of course not. She might very well be defeated in the primaries. HOWEVER, there is no indication of that at this time.
More importantly, what makes anyone think the people who voted in the poll are Democrats?
Are Conservative trolls somehow prevented from going to the MSNBC website?
There is the possibility that a few voted many times though. We need poll ID now!![]()
oh please! she not near as old a ronny ray gun..Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
"ronny ray gun"????oh please! she not near as old a ronny ray gun..Aside from being a lying, corrupt, scumbag bitch . . .
She. Is. Too. Damn. Old.
Personally I don't think she is healthy enough either, I think there is something more that we know going on with regards to her health.
That got old around March, 1965.