/----/ Refute what he said - or STFU. And CNN pays rush???? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHaha,rush the paid liar. The guy who regurgitates his diarrhea doesn't exactly make himself look smart..../āā/ āAnd Iām telling you the reason why the Democrats want to see whatās redacted in this report is because they know damn well that Barr is in fact underway with his investigation right now, and they want to find out as much as they can about what Barr is gonna learn. And whether some of that is in the redacted portions of the Mueller report or not, thatās why they want to see it.ā RushCorrect, they wont settle for less than what they are demanding. Go ahead, throw your little hissy fit because the opposition plays hardball. I expect it from you.The democRATs wonāt even read what is available-
"CNN today. Audio sound bite number 1 on the program they call Newsroom. Evan Perez, the Justice Department correspondent for CNN, was asked the following questions: āThe Democrats are gonna vote to hold Barr in contempt. How symbolic is that? Is this a negotiation just like Republicans held Eric Holder in contempt and were able to get the White House to negotiate and get those documents on Fast and Furious? Is that the best case outcome for the Democrats here?ā
PEREZ: I find it odd that the Democrats decided to use this as the thing to hold the Attorney General in contempt over. I mean, look. They have a lot of things to be mad at him over. They accused him of misleading testimony. Obviously he didnāt show up for a hearing in the past week. So thereās a lot of things that they could be mad about. And this one, this is a report that is 92% public. Only 8% of it was unredacted. (sic) The Attorney General last week in his testimony said only 2% of volume 2, which is the thing that the Democrats say they care most about, the obstruction part, is redacted. So, you know, itās kind of hard to understand how they went nuclear so quickly on this. It seems rather like they have started a constitutional crisis, not the other way around." - Rush