Mueller Up To His Old Tricks - Busted Hiding Evidence Of Innocense

Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

It’s all a fraud"

.

If Mueller was willing to pull off a stunt like this, there may be others we don't know about.

And it's probably the reason he didn't hire any conservative lawyers for his team. He hired mostly anti-Trump lawyers or Hillary lovers, or both.

A conservative member just may have brought this (and other) issues up after the report. It seems Mueller wanted loyalty which I'm sure he got out of his team. None of them would be willing to do anything to help Trump out.
 
Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

It’s all a fraud"

.
Mueller sent 4 innocent men to prison?
Is this referring to the Whitey Bulger crimes?
If so, Mueller wasnt even involved with that.
 
Ok, then i'll agree with Nunes. Lets release all of the Mueller report with all accompanying evidence. (aka un-redacted)
So you do not deny the report and admit Mueller hid evidence...good start.

Barr has released every bit of the with the Mueller Report - everything he legally can.

Why do snowflakes continue to ask BARR what Mueller said, especially after Mueller was caught hiding evidence, when they can subpoena Mueller and force him to answer questions under oath?
 
Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

It’s all a fraud"

.

Dowd is going down and I'm sure Tramp put him up to it. Flynn should be put away for the rest of his life, traitor and they had best release the rest of the transcripts. They can't protect tramp for long.
'Protect' Trump? By hiding the full transcript of the message Mueller sought to create a perception of obstruction when the full tape proves the opposite.

Funny, Dems and snowflakes have been demanding the US AG release the full Mueller report, to include Grand Jury testimony that can not legally be released, and we now find evidence that the only person who has been hiding full transcripts / reports is MUELLER!

:p

We shall have Mueller testify before congress since tramps wants him to now. Or is that just another false narrative coming from the WH?
 
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?

You do realize that how an investigation was conducted is more important than what was uncovered?
If you don't, then you must not like Democracy much.
 
We shall have Mueller testify before congress since tramps wants him to now. Or is that just another false narrative coming from the WH?
The issue is not that the President now wants Mueller to testify under oath after his proving to have hidden evidence in an attempt to create a false collusion narrative...

The issue is WHY DEMS / SNOWFLAKES DON'T WANT MUELLER TO TESTIFY / SEEM TO OPPOSE MUELLER TESTIFYING!

The whole time Democrats were demanding Barr break the law and holding him in Contempt for refusing to break the law to get the full report of what Mueller supposedly said, WHY DIDN'T NADLER JUST SUBPOENA MUELLER AND ASK THE MAN HIMSELF UNDER OATH WHAT WAS IN HIS REPORT?
 
We shall have Mueller testify before congress since tramps wants him to now. Or is that just another false narrative coming from the WH?
The issue is not that the President now wants Mueller to testify under oath after his proving to have hidden evidence in an attempt to create a false collusion narrative...

The issue is WHY DEMS / SNOWFLAKES DON'T WANT MUELLER TO TESTIFY / SEEM TO OPPOSE MUELLER TESTIFYING!

The whole time Democrats were demanding Barr break the law and holding him in Contempt for refusing to break the law to get the full report of what Mueller supposedly said, WHY DIDN'T NADLER JUST SUBPOENA MUELLER AND ASK THE MAN HIMSELF UNDER OATH WHAT WAS IN HIS REPORT?

Barr is in contempt of congress, and Mueller should be subpoenaed.
Team Trump Now Wants Mueller to Testify Before Congress in Hopes of a Grilling
-------------------------------------------
he will get the grilling of a lifetime by republicans, but the Dems will win out.
 
Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

It’s all a fraud"

.

:lol:

He gave an excuse when attempting to obstruct justice on Donald's behalf, and you think that Mueller not falling for it is hiding evidence?
 
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

--------------

I want Mueller to testify, and he likely will have to.
 
Last edited:
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
 
Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

It’s all a fraud"

.

This is why Capt is the best poster on this board. By a wide margin. Thank you, Capt.
 
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
Clarity
Transparency
Daylight

The Mueller report was a summary,

Look what just happened with Dowd' s call to Flynn' s lawyer, it was summarized, but the full release clarified the call.
 
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
Clarity
Transparency
Daylight

The Mueller report was a summary,

Look what just happened with Dowd' s call to Flynn' s lawyer, it was summarized, but the full release clarified the call.

No because it has not been fully released. There is a less redacted version however, and not one Democrat was interested in looking at it.
 
Barr must Release the full unredacted report!!! What's the hold up?
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
Clarity
Transparency
Daylight

The Mueller report was a summary,

Look what just happened with Dowd' s call to Flynn' s lawyer, it was summarized, but the full release clarified the call.

No because it has not been fully released. There is a less redacted version however, and not one Democrat was interested in looking at it.

A judge ordered for the full transcript of the phone call from Dowd, be released in Full... is what I was talking about.

I think these things being released piece meal only prolongs the agony of our differences, and keeps the media, in their frenzy, and our politicians in their each separate "Got Cha modes"....

Let's just get the whole thing over with, from every angle...including the origins of the investigation and Page FISA warrant....

instead of giving our politicians the fodder to selectively promote their own side's talking points, one by one by one by one....

enough already!!!
 
Nice try, snowflake. It was explained to Nadler by a Constitutional law expert under oath before his Committee that every bit of the report that can be released has been, that the Grand Jury info can not be legally released, and it was made clear that he and Pelosi had held the vote and held the US AG in 'Contempt' for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW. This had all been decided by an earlier court case this year on this same issue.

So if attempted distractions with false narratives is all you have to contribute, go away.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the truth, why doesn't Nadler subpoena Mueller and force him to testify and answer questions under oath?

That way there will be no more confusion, controversy, or questions.

Why do you continue to ask the US AG for what Mueller said when Democrats could easily ask Mueller himself, snowflake?
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
Clarity
Transparency
Daylight

The Mueller report was a summary,

Look what just happened with Dowd' s call to Flynn' s lawyer, it was summarized, but the full release clarified the call.

No because it has not been fully released. There is a less redacted version however, and not one Democrat was interested in looking at it.

A judge ordered for the full transcript of the phone call from Dowd, be released in Full... is what I was talking about.

I think these things being released piece meal only prolongs the agony of our differences, and keeps the media, in their frenzy, and our politicians in their each separate "Got Cha modes"....

Let's just get the whole thing over with, from every angle...including the origins of the investigation and Page FISA warrant....

instead of giving our politicians the fodder to selectively promote their own side's talking points, one by one by one by one....

enough already!!!

Well that's not going to happen. Barr is only starting his investigations into the FBI, the FISA abuse and possible criminality, and of course, Hillary. Don't look for much cooperation there.

So we have no choice but to wait it out. The more Barr finds, the more the Democrats are going to try and hide information. The more they are going to try and interfere or try to take media attention off the subject.
 
Devin Nunes calls 'fraud,' citing difference between Mueller report, Dowd transcript

"U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes called for the release of “all backup and source information” for the Mueller report on Friday after a newly released transcript of a former Trump lawyer's voicemail message included content that did not appear in a version that was part of the special counsel's Russia investigation findings"

"Nunes retweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text and the Mueller report text, suggesting that the Mueller report did not disclose the full Dowd message. Mueller had redacted the part of the voicemail where Dowd said he wanted the heads up “not only for the president but for the country” and that he wasn’t asking for “any confidential information.”
How in the World would anything Flynn confessed and told the TRUTH about to the Special Counsel, be of anything that would be harmful to the President, or for the Country?

I was taught, the TRUTH will set you free...

Honesty is the best policy...


and by one of my bosses, who's policy for us managers was "no surprises"?

Once again, just like when he sent 4 innocent men to prison by withholding key evidence proving they were innocent, Mueller is busted for reacting / withholding key evidence to bolster his biased coup attempt against the President...

You have been shown before that this is simply not True... it is FAKE NEWS from your beloved right wing media.

Do you want me to give you the Links again on it, to show how wrong you are on it?
 
Mueller is corrupt to the core

He had erased the evidence of strock and pages phones

Why was he not fired immediately for at least gross negligeance??

He should be charged with obstruction of justice
 
Good Morning Easy,

We know grand jury material has to be withheld under law,

UNLESS a judge allows it to be released. We want Barr to go before a judge with congress, to ask permission for its release.

This is what Kenneth Starr and congress did for the Clinton investigation/ Starr Report...All grand jury testimony was released by a Judge's approval.

__________________________

Oh my dear sillyone
Robert Mueller left as Fbi Director in 2013,
He was not there in 2014....

And what do you hope will be seen if a judge would release it? Virtually everything is out there now.

Democrats are going to try and beat this dead horse until the 2020 elections, or get as close as they can to it. That's all this (and subpoenas) are about.
Clarity
Transparency
Daylight

The Mueller report was a summary,

Look what just happened with Dowd' s call to Flynn' s lawyer, it was summarized, but the full release clarified the call.

No because it has not been fully released. There is a less redacted version however, and not one Democrat was interested in looking at it.

A judge ordered for the full transcript of the phone call from Dowd, be released in Full... is what I was talking about.

I think these things being released piece meal only prolongs the agony of our differences, and keeps the media, in their frenzy, and our politicians in their each separate "Got Cha modes"....

Let's just get the whole thing over with, from every angle...including the origins of the investigation and Page FISA warrant....

instead of giving our politicians the fodder to selectively promote their own side's talking points, one by one by one by one....

enough already!!!

Well that's not going to happen. Barr is only starting his investigations into the FBI, the FISA abuse and possible criminality, and of course, Hillary. Don't look for much cooperation there.

So we have no choice but to wait it out. The more Barr finds, the more the Democrats are going to try and hide information. The more they are going to try and interfere or try to take media attention off the subject.
See, once again, this is SELECTIVE, and for a political purpose and not for the sake of clarity, but partisan politics. Just the fact that Barr is not following the Justice department procedures, to not be a political arm of the president or anyone and do things by the book.

By the book would be the IG, the inspector general, someone impartial with the job of oversight to be the one who investigates instead of using his own politicos, that 60% of the country will not believe.... how does that solve anything?

Barr doing these sidebars, or work arounds of his department's standards, protocols and procedures, makes him an untrustworthy AG, a partisan AG and is simply NOT RIGHT and not JUST.... as in Justice. We look like Russia and how Putin handles things imo.... not the USA.

AG Barr is the Attorney General of the United States of America, NOT President Trump's political partner or lawyer.

He works for us, not just Trump, not just you, but all of us citizens....

And one thing all of you have done, every single one of you, is disregarded more than half the country's citizens, since President Trump has taken office... that's simply not right that you have thrown out most of the country's concerns, with the bath water. I feel like I don't even have a country anymore, and certainly do not have a country that I recognize.
 

Forum List

Back
Top