Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the study i go by is experience.....all the people i ran into that smoked pot that were violent, argumentive or reckless did other drugs like meth or were beer drinkers or had personality problems to start off......just smoking pot,pretty dam rare....there are so many reasons a person can lose it....i seriously doubt if smoking pot is a major reason they lose it....pot would be pretty rare...thats pretty fucking rare.....and of course the "study" doesnt mention what else they were using....and they mention if the people already had a personality disorder they might be prone to violence....Marijuana Use Increases Violent BehaviorNo, pot does not have that affect. I really don't understand the rise of violence in our nation, not just Colorado.
"Together, the results of the present study provide support for a causal relationship between exposure to cannabis and subsequent violent outcomes across a major part of the lifespan."
It was also said despite all that there was a causal relationship.
From the same link
What makes this new study more compelling than previous studies is that the researchers followed the same individuals for over 50 years from a young age to adulthood. This is precisely what one needs to solve the chicken or egg riddle with respect to cannabis and violence: just look and see which one happens first.
Hers's what they found: Most of the participants never used cannabis and they were never reported to have violent behavior. 38% of the participants did try cannabis at least once in their life. Most of them experimented with cannabis in their teens, but then stopped using it. However, 20% of the boys who started using pot by age 18 continued to use it through middle age (32-48 years). One fifth of those who were pot smokers (22%) reported violent behavior that began after beginning to use cannabis, whereas only 0.3% reported violence before using weed. Continued use of cannabis over the life-time of the study was the strongest predictor of violent convictions, even when the other factors that contribute to violent behavior were considered in the statistical analysis.
Don't like the study then find one you do like.
Any drug that lowers inhibitions can lead to violence
Here you go moronBullshit. I know people that are addicted to weed. You cant even get a rise out of them.Marijuana Use Increases Violent BehaviorNo, pot does not have that affect. I really don't understand the rise of violence in our nation, not just Colorado.What is up with CO? Why is there so much violence in such a beautiful area....
Too many people getting Rocky Mountain high?
"Together, the results of the present study provide support for a causal relationship between exposure to cannabis and subsequent violent outcomes across a major part of the lifespan."
Then refute the study with another.
Your anecdotal musings are completely irrelevant
the study i go by is experience.....all the people i ran into that smoked pot that were violent, argumentive or reckless did other drugs like meth or were beer drinkers or had personality problems to start off......just smoking pot,pretty dam rare....there are so many reasons a person can lose it....i seriously doubt if smoking pot is a major reason they lose it....pot would be pretty rare...thats pretty fucking rare.....and of course the "study" doesnt mention what else they were using....and they mention if the people already had a personality disorder they might be prone to violence....Marijuana Use Increases Violent Behavior
"Together, the results of the present study provide support for a causal relationship between exposure to cannabis and subsequent violent outcomes across a major part of the lifespan."
It was also said despite all that there was a causal relationship.
From the same link
What makes this new study more compelling than previous studies is that the researchers followed the same individuals for over 50 years from a young age to adulthood. This is precisely what one needs to solve the chicken or egg riddle with respect to cannabis and violence: just look and see which one happens first.
Hers's what they found: Most of the participants never used cannabis and they were never reported to have violent behavior. 38% of the participants did try cannabis at least once in their life. Most of them experimented with cannabis in their teens, but then stopped using it. However, 20% of the boys who started using pot by age 18 continued to use it through middle age (32-48 years). One fifth of those who were pot smokers (22%) reported violent behavior that began after beginning to use cannabis, whereas only 0.3% reported violence before using weed. Continued use of cannabis over the life-time of the study was the strongest predictor of violent convictions, even when the other factors that contribute to violent behavior were considered in the statistical analysis.
Don't like the study then find one you do like.
Any drug that lowers inhibitions can lead to violence
Was that the only thing in his system?the study i go by is experience.....all the people i ran into that smoked pot that were violent, argumentive or reckless did other drugs like meth or were beer drinkers or had personality problems to start off......just smoking pot,pretty dam rare....there are so many reasons a person can lose it....i seriously doubt if smoking pot is a major reason they lose it....pot would be pretty rare...thats pretty fucking rare.....and of course the "study" doesnt mention what else they were using....and they mention if the people already had a personality disorder they might be prone to violence....
It was also said despite all that there was a causal relationship.
From the same link
What makes this new study more compelling than previous studies is that the researchers followed the same individuals for over 50 years from a young age to adulthood. This is precisely what one needs to solve the chicken or egg riddle with respect to cannabis and violence: just look and see which one happens first.
Hers's what they found: Most of the participants never used cannabis and they were never reported to have violent behavior. 38% of the participants did try cannabis at least once in their life. Most of them experimented with cannabis in their teens, but then stopped using it. However, 20% of the boys who started using pot by age 18 continued to use it through middle age (32-48 years). One fifth of those who were pot smokers (22%) reported violent behavior that began after beginning to use cannabis, whereas only 0.3% reported violence before using weed. Continued use of cannabis over the life-time of the study was the strongest predictor of violent convictions, even when the other factors that contribute to violent behavior were considered in the statistical analysis.
Don't like the study then find one you do like.
Any drug that lowers inhibitions can lead to violence
There are a few people where it has the opposite effect. There was an Alameda County Deputy who was murdered about 18 years ago by an asshole high on pot. So it does happen.
Was that the only thing in his system?the study i go by is experience.....all the people i ran into that smoked pot that were violent, argumentive or reckless did other drugs like meth or were beer drinkers or had personality problems to start off......just smoking pot,pretty dam rare....there are so many reasons a person can lose it....i seriously doubt if smoking pot is a major reason they lose it....pot would be pretty rare...It was also said despite all that there was a causal relationship.
From the same link
What makes this new study more compelling than previous studies is that the researchers followed the same individuals for over 50 years from a young age to adulthood. This is precisely what one needs to solve the chicken or egg riddle with respect to cannabis and violence: just look and see which one happens first.
Hers's what they found: Most of the participants never used cannabis and they were never reported to have violent behavior. 38% of the participants did try cannabis at least once in their life. Most of them experimented with cannabis in their teens, but then stopped using it. However, 20% of the boys who started using pot by age 18 continued to use it through middle age (32-48 years). One fifth of those who were pot smokers (22%) reported violent behavior that began after beginning to use cannabis, whereas only 0.3% reported violence before using weed. Continued use of cannabis over the life-time of the study was the strongest predictor of violent convictions, even when the other factors that contribute to violent behavior were considered in the statistical analysis.
Don't like the study then find one you do like.
Any drug that lowers inhibitions can lead to violence
There are a few people where it has the opposite effect. There was an Alameda County Deputy who was murdered about 18 years ago by an asshole high on pot. So it does happen.
Colorado Walmart suspect ID'd; 3 killed in shooting
more on the story @ Colorado Walmart suspect ID'd; 3 killed in shooting
From the OP use of general dislike of general characteristics such as "hatred" that's a clue the shooter is white. Amiright?
Or stop guns being an every day item. You forgot that one.
After you ban guns you'll have to ban motor vehicles too.
No, pot does not have that affect. I really don't understand the rise of violence in our nation, not just Colorado.
What is up with CO? Why is there so much violence in such a beautiful area....
Too many people getting Rocky Mountain high?
In a country the size of ours these things are bound to happen from time to time. The only way to avoid it would be to impose tyrannically repressive laws, such as frequent and random body searches, home searches, and car searches by police. There is no other way.
Or stop guns being an every day item. You forgot that one.
Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.Oh, shut the fuck up, you Goddamned liar. I have not yet seen anything that shows that man had any particular political leanings.Harris and Klebold came from wealthy homes...the Las Vegas shooter was a rich liberal.
You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
So that makes the Wal*Mart shooter politically motivated? Or the Las Vegas shooter?Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.Oh, shut the fuck up, you Goddamned liar. I have not yet seen anything that shows that man had any particular political leanings.
You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
The black lives matter sumpathizers who have murdered police officers were politically motivated.....
You tell us.So that makes the Wal*Mart shooter politically motivated? Or the Las Vegas shooter?Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.
You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
The black lives matter sumpathizers who have murdered police officers were politically motivated.....
So that makes the Wal*Mart shooter politically motivated? Or the Las Vegas shooter?Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.
You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
The black lives matter sumpathizers who have murdered police officers were politically motivated.....
Crimes are not always politically motivated. To assume so is not merely foolish, but utterly arrogant. You would set us apart by politics, putting your political values on a pedestal. Thinking stupidly that Comservatives are incapable of committing crimes when we all know that is not the case.You tell us.So that makes the Wal*Mart shooter politically motivated? Or the Las Vegas shooter?Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
The black lives matter sumpathizers who have murdered police officers were politically motivated.....
Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.Oh, shut the fuck up, you Goddamned liar. I have not yet seen anything that shows that man had any particular political leanings.i dont think being rich makes you want to go out and kill people....What is up with CO? Why is there so much violence in such a beautiful area....
Too many rich liberals
Harris and Klebold came from wealthy homes...the Las Vegas shooter was a rich liberal.
By citing Black Americans killing police? Can you thus justify rednecks lynching Blacks?So that makes the Wal*Mart shooter politically motivated? Or the Las Vegas shooter?Why do you insist on imposing politics on crime? Do you really believe criminals are politically motivated? Or because you have a tentative grasp on politics, imposing a political template on things you cannot comprehend makes it easier for you?Because you say so? Sorry charlie, only a sick dim would do LV, or a muslim.You're making a cultural, rather than a political assumption. Rather carelessly at that.
The black lives matter sumpathizers who have murdered police officers were politically motivated.....
I answered your question....
Who goes to country concerts and sings God bless America? Conservatives.Oh, shut the fuck up, you Goddamned liar. I have not yet seen anything that shows that man had any particular political leanings.i dont think being rich makes you want to go out and kill people....Too many rich liberals
Harris and Klebold came from wealthy homes...the Las Vegas shooter was a rich liberal.
The Las Vegas shooter rented rooms and scouted locations over looking large gatherings including various musical venues before Vegas. In fact one of his potential targets was the Lalopalooza Festival in Chicago, Boston Center for Arts and Boston's Fenway Park. He also rented units over looking Life is Beatiful Festival.
I don't think Lalapalooza is conservative. Just a thought.
In a country the size of ours these things are bound to happen from time to time. The only way to avoid it would be to impose tyrannically repressive laws, such as frequent and random body searches, home searches, and car searches by police. There is no other way.
Or stop guns being an every day item. You forgot that one.
They aren't an everyday item. You have to go through paperwork, a waiting period and a background check...hardly an everyday item......and considering there are close to 600 million guns in this country and so few mass public shootings.....only 6 in 2016 with 71 dead....versus the 89 killed by a rental truck in one incident in a country that bans guns ......there is no problem here...
One profile point is the same with all of them: they love guns.Right now, I have not seen a rational reason for what the Vegas shooter did. Total opposite profile from most of the shooters. The only time he was the same as them was during the shooting, and when he shot himself. Mass murder, then suicide, seems to be the MO of these people.
