Musk to Publish Hunter Biden Story Suppression On Twitter Today - 5pm

[candycorn]

What does that mean in your own words, old hag? It means Twitter suppressed it based on their own biased view. You’re making my point and you’re too stupid to see it.

 

[Marener]

Geez. What a nothing burger.

 

[Leo123]

Precisely but with knowledge of the head of legal who was fired, you dumb old hag

They are so brainwashed the truth, to them, is actually offensive.

 

[multivita-man]

No, Twitter was a 'shit show' before Musk because it was being run by the DNC. Now it is no longer a DNC/DOJ secret censorship machine. It's not only Twitter, the FBI sought out Zuckerberg with regard to the Hunter Biden story. The laptop is NOT 'Russian disinformation.' The former Twitter suppression policies and the operatives will have to pay for this.

It was a publicly-traded company, moron. It was owned by shareholders -- probably like you.

 

[multivita-man]

with comments like that I’m pretty sure you just smoked every flavor of crack there is before posting. Jesus fucking Christ.

Crack has flavors? Who knew?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

They are so brainwashed the truth, to them, is actually offensive.

You assume there is something to wash.

 

[bodecea]

This thread needs occasional refreshing.

 

[JGalt]

View attachment 733948

In other words, he is saying that laptop was not hacked material. There wasn't any government involved in creating what was on the laptop.

That was a cryptic and poorly-written statement. There were warnings from federal law enforcement about possible hacks from foreign governments, but Taibbi didn't find any evidence of any foreign government's involvement in the laptop story.

If you remember correctly, what was being released about Hunter's laptop was originally claimed by 50+ government intelligence people and most of the media to be "Russian disinformation", in other words, "government involvement." Hunter Biden himself tried to blame it on Russians taking the laptop from his room at one point, as a Russian Psy-Op to effect the outcome of his father's campaign.

Chris Wray and the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was legitimate, yet they purposely participated in the media disinformation and the suppression of the New York Post story on Twitter and Facebook. That is the "problem" Taibbi was referring to when he posted "In fact, that might have been the problem."

Read again what Taibbi posted:

"22. Although several sources recalled hearing about a “general” warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence - that I've seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story. In fact, that might have been the problem..."

 

[candycorn]

In other words, he is saying that laptop was not hacked material. There wasn't any government involved in creating what was on the laptop.

That was a cryptic and poorly-written statement. There were warnings from federal law enforcement about possible hacks from foreign governments, but Taibbi didn't find any evidence of any foreign government's involvement in the laptop story.

If you remember correctly, what was being released about Hunter's laptop was originally claimed by 50+ government intelligence people and most of the media to be "Russian disinformation", in other words, "government involvement." Hunter Biden himself tried to blame it on Russians taking the laptop from his room at one point, as a Russian Psy-Op to effect the outcome of his father's campaign.

Chris Wray and the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was legitimate, yet they purposely participated in the media disinformation and the suppression of the New York Post story on Twitter and Facebook. That is the "problem" Taibbi was referring to when he posted "In fact, that might have been the problem."

Read again what Taibbi posted:

"22. Although several sources recalled hearing about a “general” warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence - that I've seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story. In fact, that might have been the problem..."

False

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

In other words, he is saying that laptop was not hacked material. There wasn't any government involved in creating what was on the laptop.

That was a cryptic and poorly-written statement. There were warnings from federal law enforcement about possible hacks from foreign governments, but Taibbi didn't find any evidence of any foreign government's involvement in the laptop story.

If you remember correctly, what was being released about Hunter's laptop was originally claimed by 50+ government intelligence people and most of the media to be "Russian disinformation", in other words, "government involvement." Hunter Biden himself tried to blame it on Russians taking the laptop from his room at one point, as a Russian Psy-Op to effect the outcome of his father's campaign.

Chris Wray and the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was legitimate, yet they purposely participated in the media disinformation and the suppression of the New York Post story on Twitter and Facebook. That is the "problem" Taibbi was referring to when he posted "In fact, that might have been the problem."

Read again what Taibbi posted:

"22. Although several sources recalled hearing about a “general” warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence - that I've seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story. In fact, that might have been the problem..."

The hag knows that. She is trolling.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This thread needs occasional refreshing.

You’re done. This is step one. More files will be released that will show that the Democratic Party was heavily influencing Twitter.

 

[JGalt]

The hag knows that. She is trolling.

Ask me how I know that. I've been reading liberal's responses to that particular statement for the last hour on Twitter. They're all piling on that one statement as meaning "Muh Biden done had nuffin to do with it. Him dindu nuffin."

Her response is no different. She even keeps repeating it like some sort of "mantra."

 

[Ame®icano]

So, Elon Musk has said that the details of the suppression of the Hunter laptop story will be published today at 5PM ET.

To include a live Q&A

Now, this should be fun.

Democrats coordinated censorship with big tech and media is clear statement of totalitarian inclinations.

 

[flacaltenn]

View attachment 733948

Give it up. THe old head of Twitter security and content was interviewed all over the media last week. Acknowledged the personal "heads up" warning from an un-named govt official. Didn't admit that it said anything specific about the laptop story. But the timing of the CENSOR decision indicates the 2 are intimately connected and it WILL come out. Give it a few days.

Taibbi has had tons of material for a couple hours. There WILL be names. They WILL be Dem operatives calling out specific actions and getting them processed WILLINGLY by Twitter.

Dems are screwed. Prepare yourself for an extinction event.

 

[candycorn]

Give it up. THe old head of Twitter security and content was interviewed all over the media last week. Acknowledged the personal "heads up" warning from an un-named govt official. Didn't admit that it said anything specific about the laptop story. But the timing of the CENSOR decision indicates the 2 are intimately connected and it WILL come out. Give it a few days.

Taibbi has had tons of material for a couple hours. There WILL be names. They WILL be Dem operatives calling out specific actions and getting them processed WILLINGLY by Twitter.

Dems are screwed. Prepare yourself for an extinction event.

When your source says there is no proof....that is game over.

 

[Ame®icano]

I am sure this will positively impact SpaceX contracts..

It's good to know that government can always count on their Russian and Chinese friends.

 

[Ame®icano]

You’d be happier following the ground breaking six years of Trump taxes story.

If there is anything fishy with Trumps taxes, I'm sure there would be a leak from IRS by now.

 

[Ame®icano]

What does that mean in your own words, old hag? It means Twitter suppressed it based on their own biased view. You’re making my point and you’re too stupid to see it.

Not entirely true. Twitter suppressed it on request from DNC and Biden's campaign.
Given that nearly all Twitter employees were Democrats, they were more than willing to do it.

 

[Ame®icano]

The hag knows that. She is trolling.

"hag"

 

[Ame®icano]

Geez. What a nothing burger.

"Nothing burger." Wishful thinking, retard.

It's nothing we didn't already know, except maybe that Democrat intimidation worked alongside inherent political bias, but it's an irrefutable official narrative now.

What is presented today was open admission, with evidence, that political actors had control over censorship on Twitter. Twitter was specifically guided by appealing to Democrats and was targetting accounts at the behest of Democrat operatives. Twitter was knowingly jerry rigging existing policy to exert control over the Hunter Biden narrative to favor Democrats. Twitter and Democrats were more worried about not suppressing the story cleanly than upholding the First Amendment. What we've seen today was open admission, with evidence, that Twitter was concerned with damage control over the potential public perception of their behavior. Democrats complained the story might get more attention because Twitter's behavior was too obvious. And Twitter's inherent political bias caused a moral hazard which lead to trumpeting the "First Amendment isn't absolute" line fed to them by Democrats.