daws101
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2011
- 41,526
- 3,122
The evidence is obvious.Kinda obvious don't you think?A chance is still a chance.
---
Yes, but in the realistic scientific world, probabilities are assigned "significance".
The very low probability that a gun toter would be nearby and able to prevent a quick random attack would be insignificant.
I submit that an American store patron would be more likely to intervene even if unarmed.
---
Why do you believe that?
Have you been to Sweden?
Do you also submit there are intervention differences across regions within the USA?
---
No. Explain. If you have any evidence, you get brownie points too.