Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 69,914
- 34,858
- 2,300
Uhm they used to choose to work for 25 cents an hour..
When? During the fucking Depression? When people were starving to death?
You idiot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uhm they used to choose to work for 25 cents an hour..
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment would enable market participants to self-select.So stop whining about minimum wageAn employee makes a profit off of every workerI don't. But if they want to anyway, it's their business.
What you all can't seem to accept is that some jobs aren't worth minimum wage. And what you're saying with MW laws is that those jobs shouldn't be allowed.
So what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
You're kidding yourself. MW doesn't make anyone 'pay up'. It just bans low-wage jobs.
No it means their labor is worth that to the market in which I operate.So stop whining about minimum wageAn employee makes a profit off of every workerI don't. But if they want to anyway, it's their business.
What you all can't seem to accept is that some jobs aren't worth minimum wage. And what you're saying with MW laws is that those jobs shouldn't be allowed.
So what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
I'm not whining I just think it's completely unnecessary.
and every one of my employees makes at least 15 an hour and 3 of them make 80 to 100 K a year
But then again my employees have to actually have some skills unlike the people who aspire to do nothing but stuff burgers into paper bags
Which means that their labor is worth more to you than $15/hr. Answer this: Would you keep an employee on board and pay him that wage if his work did not contribute that much to your bottom line? Would that be fair to your other employees who would have to deal with a less profitable or even money losing business?
And they are CHOOSING to stay thereThey aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.
Bottom line...if the work isn't worth more than the pennies you dipshits are willing to pay...then there's a problem with your business model and your product.
Do it yourself and see how much money you make. Oh...you can't get enough work done to make the kind of money you expect to make? Then pay your workers a decent wage so you can continue to make money
How much is your pitter-pattering on the keyboard worth?Bottom line...if the work isn't worth more than the pennies you dipshits are willing to pay...then there's a problem with your business model and your product.
Do it yourself and see how much money you make. Oh...you can't get enough work done to make the kind of money you expect to make? Then pay your workers a decent wage so you can continue to make money
So tell me how much is stuffing squashed mass produced burgers and greasy fries into paper bags worth
How much is your pitter-pattering on the keyboard worth?Bottom line...if the work isn't worth more than the pennies you dipshits are willing to pay...then there's a problem with your business model and your product.
Do it yourself and see how much money you make. Oh...you can't get enough work done to make the kind of money you expect to make? Then pay your workers a decent wage so you can continue to make money
So tell me how much is stuffing squashed mass produced burgers and greasy fries into paper bags worth
simply raising the minimum wage causes a "restructuring" of any "employment regime".subsidies not trade wars!work or die, is what the right wing advocates.Slavery is outlawed. What you are suggesting is "soft" slavery.
Nope. What I'm suggesting is strictly voluntary.
And you want to get paid for not working, even though you're perfectly capable.
Care to stay on topic?
social services didn't cost the equivalent to twenty-four cents, back then.They aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.
Uhm they used to choose to work for 25 cents an hour..
.
Uhm they used to choose to work for 25 cents an hour..
When? During the fucking Depression? When people were starving to death?
You idiot
lol. Why blame the Poor? The "rich have a natural rate unemployment at their disposal", simply for the sake of the bottom line, not the People.Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment would enable market participants to self-select.So stop whining about minimum wageAn employee makes a profit off of every worker
So what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
You're kidding yourself. MW doesn't make anyone 'pay up'. It just bans low-wage jobs.
Getting off your ass and getting s job would end your personal unemployment
social services didn't cost the equivalent to twenty-four cents, back then.They aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.
Uhm they used to choose to work for 25 cents an hour..
.
lol. Why blame the Poor? The "rich have a natural rate unemployment at their disposal", simply for the sake of the bottom line, not the People.Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment would enable market participants to self-select.So stop whining about minimum wageSo what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
You're kidding yourself. MW doesn't make anyone 'pay up'. It just bans low-wage jobs.
Getting off your ass and getting s job would end your personal unemployment
That only makes sense in a vacuum of special pleading. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour.No it means their labor is worth that to the market in which I operate.So stop whining about minimum wageAn employee makes a profit off of every worker
So what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
I'm not whining I just think it's completely unnecessary.
and every one of my employees makes at least 15 an hour and 3 of them make 80 to 100 K a year
But then again my employees have to actually have some skills unlike the people who aspire to do nothing but stuff burgers into paper bags
Which means that their labor is worth more to you than $15/hr. Answer this: Would you keep an employee on board and pay him that wage if his work did not contribute that much to your bottom line? Would that be fair to your other employees who would have to deal with a less profitable or even money losing business?
All my employees have skills they acquired so they made their labor worth what I pay. In fact I pay a little more than the market in my location because I want to retain employees with the skill sets they have.
So if you want to make more money it is up to you to make your labor worth more.
You are selling your labor to an employer the same as the employer is selling a product to the marketplace.
Your labor is your product it is up to you to make that product as valuable and desirable as you can
That only makes sense in a vacuum of special pleading. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour.No it means their labor is worth that to the market in which I operate.So stop whining about minimum wageSo what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
I'm not whining I just think it's completely unnecessary.
and every one of my employees makes at least 15 an hour and 3 of them make 80 to 100 K a year
But then again my employees have to actually have some skills unlike the people who aspire to do nothing but stuff burgers into paper bags
Which means that their labor is worth more to you than $15/hr. Answer this: Would you keep an employee on board and pay him that wage if his work did not contribute that much to your bottom line? Would that be fair to your other employees who would have to deal with a less profitable or even money losing business?
All my employees have skills they acquired so they made their labor worth what I pay. In fact I pay a little more than the market in my location because I want to retain employees with the skill sets they have.
So if you want to make more money it is up to you to make your labor worth more.
You are selling your labor to an employer the same as the employer is selling a product to the marketplace.
Your labor is your product it is up to you to make that product as valuable and desirable as you can
moving to where the work is, is not always a good option for Everyone.And they are CHOOSING to stay thereThey aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.
That only makes sense in a vacuum of special pleading. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour.No it means their labor is worth that to the market in which I operate.So stop whining about minimum wageSo what?
If you don't want people making money from the labor you sell then work for yourself and keep all the profit
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
I'm not whining I just think it's completely unnecessary.
and every one of my employees makes at least 15 an hour and 3 of them make 80 to 100 K a year
But then again my employees have to actually have some skills unlike the people who aspire to do nothing but stuff burgers into paper bags
Which means that their labor is worth more to you than $15/hr. Answer this: Would you keep an employee on board and pay him that wage if his work did not contribute that much to your bottom line? Would that be fair to your other employees who would have to deal with a less profitable or even money losing business?
All my employees have skills they acquired so they made their labor worth what I pay. In fact I pay a little more than the market in my location because I want to retain employees with the skill sets they have.
So if you want to make more money it is up to you to make your labor worth more.
You are selling your labor to an employer the same as the employer is selling a product to the marketplace.
Your labor is your product it is up to you to make that product as valuable and desirable as you can
It makes no sense in the real world. It merely demonstrates the right wing simply doesn't understand economics.That only makes sense in a vacuum of special pleading. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour.No it means their labor is worth that to the market in which I operate.So stop whining about minimum wage
They have profited off of low cost labor for ten years. Time to pay up
I'm not whining I just think it's completely unnecessary.
and every one of my employees makes at least 15 an hour and 3 of them make 80 to 100 K a year
But then again my employees have to actually have some skills unlike the people who aspire to do nothing but stuff burgers into paper bags
Which means that their labor is worth more to you than $15/hr. Answer this: Would you keep an employee on board and pay him that wage if his work did not contribute that much to your bottom line? Would that be fair to your other employees who would have to deal with a less profitable or even money losing business?
All my employees have skills they acquired so they made their labor worth what I pay. In fact I pay a little more than the market in my location because I want to retain employees with the skill sets they have.
So if you want to make more money it is up to you to make your labor worth more.
You are selling your labor to an employer the same as the employer is selling a product to the marketplace.
Your labor is your product it is up to you to make that product as valuable and desirable as you can
No it makes sense in the real world where you obviously don't reside
moving to where the work is, is not always a good option for Everyone.And they are CHOOSING to stay thereThey aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.
moving to where the work is, is not always a good option for Everyone.And they are CHOOSING to stay thereThey aren't forced to now. Even if you start over at the bottom, you're not expected to stay there for long.
On what planet do people CHOOSE to work for $7/ hr?
And whether YOU stay there or not...SOMEONE is staying there.