Porter Rockwell
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2018
- 6,088
- 665
I responded to this once before and then saw unkotare's reply to you wherein that POS wants to say negative things to me. Soooo... IN SEVEN PARAGRAPHS I AM GOING TO PROVE, ONCE AND FOR ALL, THAT IM2 IS AN UNEDUCATED IDIOT AND A BLACK SUPREMACIST OR A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
Ever since I came onto USM, IM2 has maintained that white supremacists embrace my work on the 14th Amendment. Occasionally, a white supremacist will come along, realize that my work would lead to a much better political outcome for white people; however, my work on the 14th Amendment shows that the illegally ratified 14th Amendment did not give blacks any "rights," but rather repealed the Bill of Rights and it had little to do with race except that the United States Supreme Court did, in fact, rule prior to the 14th Amendment that the Constitution was not intended to cover the black race. What Roger Taney wrote in the Dred Scott v. Sanford ruling is fact and I cannot change that in order to make blacks people feel good about themselves. As an example that this issue of the 14th Amendment being illegally ratified, I direct your attention to the following post on this board:
If the Bill of Rights makes liberalism illegal how does liberalism survive? See my post # 38
Approximately FOUR DECADES ago, while in school, a law professor kept telling us about the "facts" of a case. My law professor found a "right to smoke cigarettes" and I challenged it. Where were the facts? It resulted in a disciplinary action that almost got me thrown out of school. Moral: Don't challenge law school presuppositions. So, it motivated me to study the subject of Rights. I uncovered the fact that whether by accident or design the government was attacking our unalienable Rights and by the passage of the illegally ratified 14th Amendment, they nullified any God given Rights we could claim as the above link will explain. The 14th Amendment DID create TWO distinct categories of citizenship: a Preamble Citizen and a 14th Amendment citizen. The man who pioneered that legal argument was Howard Freeman and here is his introduction to the subject so that you can see THAT was not predicated on any "racist" argument: The Two United States and the Law
My work was an extension of the research Freeman had begun. I discovered that through the use of the Socialist Surveillance Number ...ooops, "Social Security Number," and the illegally ratified 14th Amendment we had been reduced to absolute slavery. We no longer had unalienable Rights, but mere privileges with ownership papers making every person in America a slave. Oh, we have the illusion of Freedom and Liberty, but at the end of the day, we are owned and controlled by puppet masters. Those puppet masters control the Ds and the Rs so that it ends up being one hand washing the other.
IF white supremacists embraced my work, then have IM2 explain to you how the anti - immigrant Tea Party Republican, United States Congressman James Sensenbrenner, introduced not only the unconstitutional so - called "Patriot Act," but the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify B.S. that mandates all of you subjects to have a Socialist Surveillance Number ... there I go again "Social Security Number" so that you can be tracked 24 / 7 / 365. If my work was about white supremacy, how in the Hell did the white supremacists end up supporting National ID? IM2 wants to credit my work with being part of white supremacy; however, if any of you have the courage to do the research, that is not the case. I've been at war with white supremacists, ESPECIALLY, the dumb asses on the anti - immigrant side who reversed almost 25 years of hard won court victories by imposing the SSN as a unique identifier on the American people. WITHOUT the SSN (which you were not required to have prior to National ID), you did not have to pay the income tax. Neither could the government lay claim to owning you as chattel property. Yes, it would have been of a major benefit to the white people, but that was just a natural outcome like building a park for kids results in giving birds healthy trees to nest in.
Both the Ds and the Rs are being played and that is not about white supremacy. The white supremacists do not back my work, but are working hard for the far left. The far left socialists want back-ground checks on firearms. But, those would mean very little without the National ID that makes tracking and surveillance of all the government's subjects possible. BOTH the Ds and the Rs are making it easier for the government to control them. BOTH the Ds and the Rs are eliminating the Right to Privacy. I've shown to the white supremacists that Donald Trump's nutty wall idea was Bill Clinton's idea BEFORE Trump championed the idea. How did both the Ds and the Rs support the same, exact idea at different times... unless they were being controlled by forces they don't understand?
Some neo-Confederates make some lip service argument about illegitimacy regarding the 14th Amendment only to jump onto Trump's MAGA bandwagon and lobby for National ID and enforcing the draconian E Verify laws, proving they don't understand a damn thing about the arguments they make except to the extent that it tells them what they want to hear about a very narrow issue. At the end of the day, they end up helping the far left realize their goals and objectives while doing damage to the work I began many decades ago. IM2 doesn't have a freaking clue as to what he's talking about and now comes his opportunity to research the subject and find out he's been played by world powers operating in a capacity he cannot fathom. Will he do the right thing OR continue to misrepresent me?
)
