Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
America has changed, you wads in the far right, libertarian, soc con, and neo-con wings.
We had 8% unemployment and a one-debate headstart and we lost, because of you. End of story.
America has changed, you wads in the far right, libertarian, soc con, and neo-con wings.
We had 8% unemployment and a one-debate headstart and we lost, because of you. End of story.
America has changed, you wads in the far right, libertarian, soc con, and neo-con wings.
We had 8% unemployment and a one-debate headstart and we lost, because of you. End of story.
More whiny BS. The game was fixed nothing could have changed the outcome it is obvious. If you want to become one of them then shut the f... up and do it. I rather lose then be a democrat or compromise morality to win an election.
That makes no sense, logical4u.
We are in the 21st century not the 18th.
You and "sense" don't exactly go together.
"Work" will always be required for man's survival. It seems the issue today is: if the individual gets to choose who they work for:
the gov't, a corporation, or themselves
vs:
the gov't (rules and regulations added making products, services and systems inefficient and slow)
It "appears" that those on the left (that would be "you", even though you throw out some moderate view, occassionally) want to remove "free choice" from individuals, and replace it with gov't "chains" and shackles.
Now if that is not easy enough for you to understand, here is a question for you: how have "people" changed in 3 hundred years to justify eliminating a system that has proven itself and replacing it with systems that have been proven to fail.
Do people have more integrity than they did in the last 3 hundred years?
Are there still people that would rather drink (or do drugs) than work?
Do people still need energy (manpower, hydro, electric, or petro) to accomplish work?
Come on, brain child, explain why we should desert a system that built this country into the most productive, the most generous country in the world, for a system that ruins cultures and countries, EVERYWHERE, it is implemented.
Get the haters on the far right out of the party.
We should have won, and the worms cost us the election.
We are the great majority, we will not change, and if the wack minority won't, they are gone.
That makes no sense, logical4u.
We are in the 21st century not the 18th.
You and "sense" don't exactly go together.
"Work" will always be required for man's survival. It seems the issue today is: if the individual gets to choose who they work for:
the gov't, a corporation, or themselves
vs:
the gov't (rules and regulations added making products, services and systems inefficient and slow)
It "appears" that those on the left (that would be "you", even though you throw out some moderate view, occassionally) want to remove "free choice" from individuals, and replace it with gov't "chains" and shackles.
Now if that is not easy enough for you to understand, here is a question for you: how have "people" changed in 3 hundred years to justify eliminating a system that has proven itself and replacing it with systems that have been proven to fail.
Do people have more integrity than they did in the last 3 hundred years?
Are there still people that would rather drink (or do drugs) than work?
Do people still need energy (manpower, hydro, electric, or petro) to accomplish work?
Come on, brain child, explain why we should desert a system that built this country into the most productive, the most generous country in the world, for a system that ruins cultures and countries, EVERYWHERE, it is implemented.
No answer, yet?
The America that House and bigrebnc and bripat and the rest will destroy America.
That won't happen, because they either support the new GOP as it will become, or they will be excluded.
jokey House is not the Dr. House
Your dream to fundamentally change America will not work.
That makes no sense, logical4u.
We are in the 21st century not the 18th.
You and "sense" don't exactly go together.
"Work" will always be required for man's survival. It seems the issue today is: if the individual gets to choose who they work for:
the gov't, a corporation, or themselves
vs:
the gov't (rules and regulations added making products, services and systems inefficient and slow)
It "appears" that those on the left (that would be "you", even though you throw out some moderate view, occassionally) want to remove "free choice" from individuals, and replace it with gov't "chains" and shackles.
Now if that is not easy enough for you to understand, here is a question for you: how have "people" changed in 3 hundred years to justify eliminating a system that has proven itself and replacing it with systems that have been proven to fail.
Do people have more integrity than they did in the last 3 hundred years?
Are there still people that would rather drink (or do drugs) than work?
Do people still need energy (manpower, hydro, electric, or petro) to accomplish work?
Come on, brain child, explain why we should desert a system that built this country into the most productive, the most generous country in the world, for a system that ruins cultures and countries, EVERYWHERE, it is implemented.
No answer, yet?
... no one on the ‘left’ is seeking to remove "free choice" and replace it with government “chains and shackles."
... no one on the left is seeking to remove "free choice" and replace it with government chains and shackles."
Sure they are. (So are people "on the right", but that's another story). They want to limit our freedom and increase the power and scope of government. They wouldn't refer to it as "chains and shackles" - they see it as a good thing; a reasonable tradeoff for a presumed increase in security.
But many of us don't see it that way. And since most of these reform plans don't tolerate dissent, it starts to look very much like the kind of authoritarian oppression you're denying.
They want to limit our freedom and increase the power and scope of government. They wouldn't refer to it as "chains and shackles" - they see it as a good thing; a reasonable tradeoff for a presumed increase in security.
... no one on the left is seeking to remove "free choice" and replace it with government chains and shackles."
Sure they are. (So are people "on the right", but that's another story). They want to limit our freedom and increase the power and scope of government. They wouldn't refer to it as "chains and shackles" - they see it as a good thing; a reasonable tradeoff for a presumed increase in security.
But many of us don't see it that way. And since most of these reform plans don't tolerate dissent, it starts to look very much like the kind of authoritarian oppression you're denying.
What do you mean "don't tolerate dissent"?
Sure they are. (So are people "on the right", but that's another story). They want to limit our freedom and increase the power and scope of government. They wouldn't refer to it as "chains and shackles" - they see it as a good thing; a reasonable tradeoff for a presumed increase in security.
But many of us don't see it that way. And since most of these reform plans don't tolerate dissent, it starts to look very much like the kind of authoritarian oppression you're denying.
What do you mean "don't tolerate dissent"?
Your precious ACA, for one. Forcing people or businesses to buy a product is the very definition of authoritarian, and any 'dissent', in the form of non-participation, is met with fines, penalties and the long arm of the IRS.
Need I go on?
Some might also call that enforcing a law.
We have suffered a major setback...there is no denying that.
The natural kneejerk reaction it's to lash out, point fingers, distance oneself from defeat.
Instead, I would ask that you take time to process the election results and thoughtfully consider the ramifications of the election, the constructive criticism that you glean from that reflection, and how we can rectify the shortfall we suffered here.
What we need is an After Action Review, not a rerun of the Blame Game.
Defeat is a fork in the road...one path leads to internal destruction, the other to strength through adversity.
Today we choose...choose wisely.
Very admirable and a correct path for republicans.
However I doubt that most of them will take your advice.
America has changed, you wads in the far right, libertarian, soc con, and neo-con wings.
We had 8% unemployment and a one-debate headstart and we lost, because of you. End of story.
Republicans like you we want to work with. Get rid of the limbaugh tea party racist.
