My paycheck was larger!

Like most drug addicts (and Trump cultists) ....a quick "fix" and shot in the arm, makes the world seem rosier.........Fuck the consequences that come later....the brief high is worth it......

Federal government will be unable to pay all bills sooner than expected, due to new tax law -
Fuck face, that money does not belong to federal government
Wrong. He thinks it IS the government's money.
By law it does, it's in the Constitution and the govt has the law on their side...Just like when you claim your rights as a citizen..
 
Like most drug addicts (and Trump cultists) ....a quick "fix" and shot in the arm, makes the world seem rosier.........Fuck the consequences that come later....the brief high is worth it......

Federal government will be unable to pay all bills sooner than expected, due to new tax law -
Fuck face, that money does not belong to federal government
Wrong. He thinks it IS the government's money.
By law it does, it's in the Constitution and the govt has the law on their side...Just like when you claim your rights as a citizen..
Na, The federal government has been overstepping for a better part of the century
 
Its time that the federal govt do without. They have been screwing the populace for too long.


Wait until the old farts who belong to the Trump Cult and that rely on SS and Medicare witness the cuts.....lol

It was the govt that you worship that raided the general fund and pulled out the goodies ie SS payments. They left you with a bunch of paper and laughed. Thats what your govt did for you.
 
It was the govt that you worship that raided the general fund and pulled out the goodies ie SS payments. They left you with a bunch of paper and laughed. Thats what your govt did for you


True.......ah, so "true".......Because we ALL know that private conglomerates care a hell of a lot more for an individual citizen than government, isn't that so?
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!
Your paycheck was larger but Trumps was larger still..
Trump makes more money than him troll.
 
It was the govt that you worship that raided the general fund and pulled out the goodies ie SS payments. They left you with a bunch of paper and laughed. Thats what your govt did for you


True.......ah, so "true".......Because we ALL know that private conglomerates care a hell of a lot more for an individual citizen than government, isn't that so?

Considering how our govt experimented on black americans ie tuskegee airmen, japanese internment camps, nuclear bombed hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children..... What were you yakking about?
 
Its time that the federal govt do without. They have been screwing the populace for too long.


Wait until the old farts who belong to the Trump Cult and that rely on SS and Medicare witness the cuts.....lol

It was the govt that you worship that raided the general fund and pulled out the goodies ie SS payments. They left you with a bunch of paper and laughed.
It's paper either way.... either you stuffed the cash into the SSA trust , at which point you have a trust fund consisting of depreciating assets (dollars) or you stuff it with T-bills (what we have now) with (hopefully) a positive yield.

IMHO It's a myth that anything was "raided", basically all that happened was surplus dollars flowing into the SSA were converted into bonds and the bonds are booked as intra governmental debt, it's far from optimal but it's a better way to do things than just stuffing the surplus dollars into a mattress.

The only other viable alternatives (to using the SS surpluses to offset federal operating expenses) would have been to increase taxes to cover operating expenses or reduce operating expenses (and we KNOW the douche bags in government don't do that). ;)
 
She is the the Marie Antoinette of American politics...proclaiming "let them eat cake!" Nat thinks that's great.

Now THAT is a "conclusion" that might have hurt a bit coming out of your ass.
Considering the quote has been used out of context for many years...

"Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly spoken by "a great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was a luxury bread enriched with butter and eggs, the quote would reflect the princess's disregard for the peasants, or her poor understanding of their situation.

While the phrase is commonly attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette,[1] there is no record of her having said it. It appears in book six of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions, his autobiography (whose first six books were written in 1765, when Marie Antoinette was nine years of age, and published in 1782). The context of Rousseau's account was his desire to have some bread to accompany some wine he had stolen; however, feeling he was too elegantly dressed to go into an ordinary bakery, he recalled the words of a "great princess":
Let them eat cake - Wikipedia

Thank you for your helping clarify as you said an out of context quote.
 
It was the govt that you worship that raided the general fund and pulled out the goodies ie SS payments. They left you with a bunch of paper and laughed. Thats what your govt did for you



True.......ah, so "true".......Because we ALL know that private conglomerates care a hell of a lot more for an individual citizen than government, isn't that so?
/——-/ conglomerate???? Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
 
Democrats will take those crumbs from you. Those aren't your crumbs. Those are the dreamer's crumbs. They deserve it. You don't.
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!
unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, uses virtually the same equation to achieve a multiplier effect. only the right wing, never gets it; not even on Tuesdays.
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!

You borrowed that money in your paycheck from the Chinese. will you be paying it back?
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!
unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, uses virtually the same equation to achieve a multiplier effect. only the right wing, never gets it; not even on Tuesdays.

Excuse me! Where do you think the unemployment money that is paid to an unemployed comes from?

Unemployment compensation comes from unemployment TAX dollars paid in by employers!

It's not some magic money pulled out of someone's pocket!
It is NOT a valid use of the multiplier effect because THERE was never any labor i.e. employment involved.
NO federal taxes paid. No FICA withheld payments by employee and employer...(which I assume you are unaware that the employer ALSO pays the same amount as the employee?)!

Geez you don't have ANY idea do you as to how taxes, businesses, employers work!
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!
Your paycheck was larger but Trumps was larger still..
two dollars?
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!

You borrowed that money in your paycheck from the Chinese. will you be paying it back?

Bullshit!
$1,084,840,000,000: Taxes Set Record Through January; $7,133 Per Worker
$1,084,840,000,000: Taxes Set Record Through January; $7,133 Per Worker; Feds Still Run Deficit of $156,939,000,000
You idiot! Where does that tax revenue come from?
A) Income taxes
B) SS taxes paid by the employer and employee!
C) Medicare taxes paid by the employer and employee!

Why are you idiots so dumb when it comes to understanding what being employed MEANS?
GEEZ more people employed means more tax revenue coming and and LESS welfare/unemployment payments going out! How stupid must you be not to
comprehend this simple formula!
More employed people creates more tax revenue and less outgo for welfare/unemployment benefits! That simple!
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!
Your paycheck was larger but Trumps was larger still..

A) Trump unlike Obama doesn't get a paycheck for being President!
For the second quarter in a row, President Donald Trump declined to take a salary and opted instead to gift the quarterly installment to a government entity, this time to the Department of Education. At a White House press briefing, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders presented a check for $100,000 to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.
DeVos said the funding would go toward hosting a camp for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) students at the Department of Education.
Updated - Trump-O-Meter: Take no salary

B) And so f..king what? I don't give crap what he makes as I'm not a feral wild dog jealous of someone else food i.e. paycheck!

I really don't understand you people's totally juvenile, no actually baby like attitude that wah wah, wah, sniffle sniffle...."he has a larger bowl of soup than I do"!
Grow up and contribute something so you can be a little more "INDEPENDENT" and not "DEPENDENT!
 
My take-home pay was larger today...thanks to the tax cuts.

Now according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median wage for workers in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $849 per week or $44,148 per year for a 40-hour work week.

In July, 102.6 million people (71% of all nonfarm payroll employees) worked in private service-providing industries, according to the most recent employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Sep 1, 2016

So if every one of the 102 million increase of just $100/month that would be over $10.2 billion a month or nearly $122.4 Billion a year increase in take home pay.

'Multiplier Effect'
Now the multiplier effect comes in to play.
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13143.pdf
"Every $1 million spent is multiplied by 1.18 or $50 billion spent by employees: $60 billion back into the GDP.
So taking that figure of 1.18 times that means the $122.4 billion in additional paychecks spent back into the economy of $144.4 Billion. That means more tax revenue for federal/state and local governments.

The "rising tide lifts all boats" works!

Nothing but Pelosi crumbs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top