Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
Hillary's butt was too big for her britches.Like ending Obamacare, building a wall and enforcing our borders and electing a President who isn't a DC establishment hack, and those are all happening. Right now I agree with you, but the best way to ensure nothing ever goes anywhere is to stop talking about it. We need to keep the dream alive. Politics is just hate and division and it's getting worse. The right barely follow the Constitution and the left don't at all. We really should explore this option
It's an interesting idea...but I think I'd rather put the energy into promoting more political parties and weakening the hold the two big ones have on everything.
Your completely selling out to one of the two seems to be an odd way of accomplishing that
It's the only viably liberal choice in the Presidential election. Jill Stein sucks. I voted Mountain Party for my state governer.
I don't believe in not voting or voting for someone who opposes what I believe in.
If Hillary supports what you believe in then you're an institutional Democrat which again contradicts what you said.
No one believes in what I believe in. I voted for Johnson because he said he believed in what I believed in and that made him the best option even though I didn't believe him.
You sure aren't undoing the two parties by voting for them
Hillary, as a candidate, supported more of the positions I felt are important, than the other candidates. That doesn't make me an institutional Democrat. It only means there were no other acceptable candidates in a crummy election.
Apparently one civil war wasn't enough to teach you that it is "one" nation, or war to ensure one nation.Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
I believe the Intermountain States Of America would have more in common with the South than any of the rest.Here's an intriguing one: This map shows the US really has 11 separate 'nations' with entirely different cultures
No! California which has already gone anyway.We could just give Texas back to Mexico...that would fix the immigration problem and there would be no more need for a wall!
Hillary's butt was too big for her britches.It's an interesting idea...but I think I'd rather put the energy into promoting more political parties and weakening the hold the two big ones have on everything.
Your completely selling out to one of the two seems to be an odd way of accomplishing that
It's the only viably liberal choice in the Presidential election. Jill Stein sucks. I voted Mountain Party for my state governer.
I don't believe in not voting or voting for someone who opposes what I believe in.
If Hillary supports what you believe in then you're an institutional Democrat which again contradicts what you said.
No one believes in what I believe in. I voted for Johnson because he said he believed in what I believed in and that made him the best option even though I didn't believe him.
You sure aren't undoing the two parties by voting for them
Hillary, as a candidate, supported more of the positions I felt are important, than the other candidates. That doesn't make me an institutional Democrat. It only means there were no other acceptable candidates in a crummy election.
She did not respect the Constitution.
She especially did not respect the 2nd Amendment.
I'm not the one calling for secession, or splitting up.America has changed. You might want to go to a foreign country. The Czech Republic has little to offer in terms of welfare payments btw.How about you go from here?Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
If you don't like America, go to the country you like best.
Like Russia.
Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
you're kind of a moron.
but nice delusional insanity.
California brought up leaving, I'm just supporting the left on this, I'm with you
Republicans have been talking about it for years.
Texas governor says secession possible
If Hillary supports what you believe in then you're an institutional Democrat which again contradicts what you said.
No one believes in what I believe in. I voted for Johnson because he said he believed in what I believed in and that made him the best option even though I didn't believe him.
You sure aren't undoing the two parties by voting for them
Hillary, as a candidate, supported more of the positions I felt are important, than the other candidates. That doesn't make me an institutional Democrat. It only means there were no other acceptable candidates in a crummy election.
If you can say "I don't believe in not voting or voting for someone who opposes what I believe in" then vote for Hillary, but you're not an institutional Democrat, that makes no sense. Explain what you think the difference is
Out of Clinton's positions - more of them fit my views then opposed my views.
Out of the other candidates - far fewer fit.
How does that contradict that you are an institutional Democrat?
Also just FYI, I'm about to leave town for the weekend. Just saying when I drop off that's why
What is an "institutional democrat"?
I vote on positions and when there is a candidate that more aligns with those positions - I vote for them. It's not always democrat.
Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
I'd let all the states keep their own borders. ie, not just part of a California, but all of Cali goes to the left. Any rightie who doesn't like it can move to one of the retard states. Any normal person living in one of the retard states can move to California or NY. It would soon even itself out. Also, no, debt is not done by population but by state. The red states carry more debt than the blue at the moment (perhaps with the exception of California)..
We could just give Texas back to Mexico...that would fix the immigration problem and there would be no more need for a wall!
Apparently one civil war wasn't enough to teach you that it is "one" nation, or war to ensure one nation.Country 1: Southern California, Las Vegas, the California coast up through the Bay Area, Hawaii, western Oregon and western Washington
Country 2: New England, New York City, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Philadelphia and far east Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Northern Virginia, Detroit and Chicago
Country 3: The rest from Country 1 to Country 2 and Alaska
We divide the debt by population
We distribute military assets by population
Each of the three new Countries have a Constitutional convention which decides whether to adapt, modify or replace the Constitution.
There is a one year transition with no internal borders meaning you can move wherever you want on the division date. After that it's fine, you just need to follow the immigration laws of the country you are moving to.
And we go from there!
I disagree, and here is why. I support the right of everyone to worship in what ever faith they choose without coercion. I also support the constitution we have which guarantees it, but keeps it separate from governance. I support those checks and balances and oppose any religious involvement in our laws or government.
Yet you vote for people who only think Christianity and Judaism are separate from government and they vastly overdo that separation
I'm not sure where you get that idea. The people I have voted for think all religion should be seperate from government. I can't think of one policy or statement that indicates otherwise.
You actually seriously don't see any difference between how the left treats religions? You get harder and harder for me to take seriously
You're constantly telling me what I think instead of listening to what I say.
Do I think the left goes nutzo on Christians? I think their zeal to divorce christian religion from the public sphere is an example of their own brand of intolerance. All the other religions are ok, but not Christianity. They go to far and it gets ridiculous (such as banning Christmas displays and openly insulting Christians).
But that doesn't mean they tolerate the incursion of ANY religion into the government whether it's biblical or tora or sharia. The right on the other hand seems to think that only Islam needs to be specifically banned from the public sphere and, in some cases, even the private one. Our constitution protects us from both religious excess and religious persecutin - we should trust it to continue to do so while allowing for freedom of religion and not give in to fear.
You certainly made it sound like you don't see how they are treated any differently. And I see nothing the left does to limit Muslims regarding government, you have some sort of separation in your mind that isn't coming out in practice.
And you're full of shit, I don't see anyone on the right pushing government religion, give examples.
I'll give you one on the left. The left is silent to liberal judges referencing Shiria law in rulings. A simple Google query will show you that
It's hilarious how you think I'm a Dem when no such party exists where I come from.[
It's hilarious how you write post after post like this that says nothing but you are a Democrat then you say what, no, you're not a Democrat
It's hilarious how you think I'm a Dem when no such party exists where I come from.[
It's hilarious how you write post after post like this that says nothing but you are a Democrat then you say what, no, you're not a Democrat
Why does your not being American prevent you from being a Democrat? You not only agree with them on every issue, but you log into an account in the United States to get instructions what to think from the Democrat party, which you obligingly think and defend their cause. And you defend the Democrat people and party as well, not just their ideas.
You are purely a Democrat. The ones here don't think for themselves either. You're a Democrat in every way
There are so many things I disagree with when it comes to the Dems
There are so many things I disagree with when it comes to the Dems
Yet there are never any you can think of
There are so many things I disagree with when it comes to the Dems
Yet there are never any you can think of
Affirmative action and abortion are two that I have mentioned on here frequently. Maybe not to you, but I have done so.
