Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am a pub and mainstream. You are a reactionary and part of a very small weird grouping.
Let's work on the economy, defeat Obama, then we can throw you guys out of party decisions and policy making.
Or realizing that you need to get the bullshit issues out of the way to tackle the ones that really matter.
You're a loon. Sixty five percent of blacks consider gay marriage a bs issue. That's the reality. Just cos you put your finger in your ears and yell nuh-uh; that aint changing.
Thing is. Not one Black will vote for Romney on the basis of this issue.
Not. One.
The New York State Conference of the NAACP has joined the teachers union in a lawsuit to halt the closure of 22 failing New York City schools and to prevent 17 New York City charter schools from opening, moving or expanding. African-American parents of charter school students have responded by rallying against the NAACP’s involvement in the lawsuit. The parents are highly upset at the NAACP’s actions while the NAACP’s justification is that the charter schools are re-establishing the doctrine of separate but equal that was banned in the 1954 supreme court ruling, Brown vs. The Board of Education and that charter schools, because they use public dollars, represent an attempt to re-create separate but unequal education. They assert this even as African-American parents of charter school students are protesting against the NAACP.
I am a pub and mainstream. You are a reactionary and part of a very small weird grouping.
Let's work on the economy, defeat Obama, then we can throw you guys out of party decisions and policy making.
Exactly who are you trying to throw out? People who want accountability, liberty and thrift? You're pathetic.
Here's the reality. You're a social liberal but you're military hawking can't allow you to leave the Republican Party. So when you see a guy like Romney, you salivate that maybe you can get exactly what you want. But in the meantime you just don't get what's going on in the world.
I am a pub and mainstream. You are a reactionary and part of a very small weird grouping.
Let's work on the economy, defeat Obama, then we can throw you guys out of party decisions and policy making.
Exactly who are you trying to throw out? People who want accountability, liberty and thrift? You're pathetic.
Here's the reality. You're a social liberal but you're military hawking can't allow you to leave the Republican Party. So when you see a guy like Romney, you salivate that maybe you can get exactly what you want. But in the meantime you just don't get what's going on in the world.
People who want to go backwards, like you, need to be powerless in party decisions. You have no idea how the world works.
Blacks do consider gay marriage an issue, but they are far more afraid of the far right wing nuts and their agendas.
Or realizing that you need to get the bullshit issues out of the way to tackle the ones that really matter.
You're a loon. Sixty five percent of blacks consider gay marriage a bs issue. That's the reality. Just cos you put your finger in your ears and yell nuh-uh; that aint changing.
Thing is. Not one Black will vote for Romney on the basis of this issue.
Not. One.
That "argument" was tried already...and failed. People tried to make that same exact argument when fighting to keep interracial marriage bans in place. You know how that turned out. This will be the same.
I know how that turned out in front of the 9th (liberal) circuit. A bad ruling is not equal to actual logic.
No, I'm referring to when the argument was tried in interracial marriage bans. Lawmakers argued that such bans we're not unconstitutional because the applied equally to men and women.
With regards to marriage there is no racial discrimination either-both blacks and whites can marry.
When one chooses to discriminate it is amazing the catchy feel good phrases one can cook up.
? If you are referring to laws that prevented blacks and whites of opposite sex from marrying- that was racial discrimination and it was corrected.
Ok, so you are on board in correcting another discrimination.
Good show!
You're a loon. Sixty five percent of blacks consider gay marriage a bs issue. That's the reality. Just cos you put your finger in your ears and yell nuh-uh; that aint changing.
Thing is. Not one Black will vote for Romney on the basis of this issue.
Not. One.
You are probably close to accurate- but a number of them won't vote for Obama either- they will just sit home as they have in years past. In essence that is a vote for Romney.
As discrimination against universal marriage will be corrected.
The idea that there is some sort of "universal marriage right" is preposterous. At that stage the entire ideas that formed and bonded marriage is done away with- It just becomes more of "whatever makes you feel good" hedonism.
It is not a question of "universal marriage"....it is a question of our government offering CIVIL marriage to one group of law-abiding tax-paying consenting adult citizens...and denying CIVIL marriage to another group of law-abiding, tax-paying consenting adult citizens based on..........what exactly?
Thing is. Not one Black will vote for Romney on the basis of this issue.
Not. One.
You are probably close to accurate- but a number of them won't vote for Obama either- they will just sit home as they have in years past. In essence that is a vote for Romney.
No, they won't. They will vote, not for Romney.
? If you are referring to laws that prevented blacks and whites of opposite sex from marrying- that was racial discrimination and it was corrected.
Ok, so you are on board in correcting another discrimination.
Good show!
Being against homosexual marriage is not discrimination- They already have the exact same rights that I do.
Ok, so you are on board in correcting another discrimination.
Good show!
Being against homosexual marriage is not discrimination- They already have the exact same rights that I do.
If they have the same rights why do you oppose it?
NAACP SaysNAACP Says “Low Pants Bill” Is Discriminatory
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) _ The Florida branch of the NAACP says a bill that would ban students from wearing their pants too low could lead to more legal trouble for black males.
Orlando Senator Gary Siplin’s bill was approved 28-11 last week by the Florida Senate.
The bill calls for no criminal sanctions, but it would prohibit students from wearing pants low so that they expose undergarments.
Violators would receive a warning for a first offense, and suspensions from school would be issued for each subsequent infraction.
NAACP President Adora Obi Nweze called it a “clearly discriminatory bill.’’
Other groups such as the Advancement Project, a Washington social advocacy organization, say the proposal is directed primarily at black males and could lead to arrests
Being against homosexual marriage is not discrimination- They already have the exact same rights that I do.
If they have the same rights why do you oppose it?
The same rights mean any man and women can marry. I can't marry a man in most states, I can't have more than one wife, I can't marry my sister(if I had one) ect..
