Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think if the US army steps up its war mongering, they could easily wipe out half the world's population and restore the planet's natural balance.
I think if the US army steps up its war mongering, they could easily wipe out half the world's population and restore the planet's natural balance.
I believe the fuel capacity of a B-29 is 9,000 gallons.
Crank up the Enola Gay and the first tank of fuel is on me, destination North Korea.
No where near half the population but this will get the ball rolling.
I think if the US army steps up its war mongering, they could easily wipe out half the world's population and restore the planet's natural balance.
I believe the fuel capacity of a B-29 is 9,000 gallons.
Crank up the Enola Gay and the first tank of fuel is on me, destination North Korea.
No where near half the population but this will get the ball rolling.
We could take out all of India without anyone caring. Everyone would probably thank us.
Mexico city also gives us a lot of bang for the bomb.
Do you like and respect the stink they put off? Or all the good land they're wasting?I believe the fuel capacity of a B-29 is 9,000 gallons.
Crank up the Enola Gay and the first tank of fuel is on me, destination North Korea.
No where near half the population but this will get the ball rolling.
We could take out all of India without anyone caring. Everyone would probably thank us.
Mexico city also gives us a lot of bang for the bomb.
I happen to like and respect Indian and Mexican folks.
Do you like and respect the stink they put off? Or all the good land they're wasting?We could take out all of India without anyone caring. Everyone would probably thank us.
Mexico city also gives us a lot of bang for the bomb.
I happen to like and respect Indian and Mexican folks.
Shacles -
I don't understand why you are presenting points no one disputes, and others which are blatantly nonsense
Higher temperatures and a longer growing season mean some of Earth's chilliest regions are looking increasingly green, researchers say.
Today, the plant life at northern latitudes often looks like the vegetation researchers would have observed up to 430 miles (700 kilometers) farther south in 1982, according to a new study.
"It's like Winnipeg, Manitoba, moving to Minneapolis-Saint Paul in only 30 years," study researcher Compton Tucker of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., said in a statement.
Shacles -
I don't understand why you are presenting points no one disputes, and others which are patently nonsense.
1. We've known for some years that Western Antarctica is losing ice, while Eastern Antarctica is gaining ice. We also know, by and large, why this is and what processes are involved. (I can link research if you like).
2. I'm afraid that simply is not true at all. There have always been spikes and troughs, but every one of the ten hottest years ever recorded occur in the past 20 years. Check with a reliable source. 1934 was the 49th hottest year on record. I just checked.
3. The southern hemisphere has been cooling over the last 10 years, just about as much as the north has been warming.
Again, that is simply nonsense, and no reliable data source could claim this. On the contrary, Australia just recorded its hottest day ever, New Zealand is crippled with droughts, and Southern Hemisphere glaciers are shrinking faster than had previously been thought possible.
The sun does influence climate, without question, but most scientists abandoned it as the major cause of climate change for good reason.
Here is an article which explains why:
As supplier of almost all the energy in Earth's climate, the sun has a strong influence on climate. A comparison of sun and climate over the past 1150 years found temperatures closely match solar activity (Usoskin 2005). However, after 1975, temperatures rose while solar activity showed little to no long-term trend. This led the study to conclude, "...during these last 30 years the solar total irradiance, solar UV irradiance and cosmic ray flux has not shown any significant secular trend, so that at least this most recent warming episode must have another source."
In fact, a number of independent measurements of solar activity indicate the sun has shown a slight cooling trend since 1960, over the same period that global temperatures have been warming. Over the last 35 years of global warming, sun and climate have been moving in opposite directions. An analysis of solar trends concluded that the sun has actually contributed a slight cooling influence in recent decades (Lockwood 2008).
Solar activity & climate: is the sun causing global warming?
And still no solutions offered for this GLOBAL situation.
Right, wrong or indifferent, what do you propose we DO about it? Can you force other countries to lower their emissions? Should we hamstring our own economy without any promise of cooperation from China and India?
Since there is about a 30 to 50 year lag in the effects of the present level of GHGs, all we can do about it at present is prepare for the inevitable consequences. Consequences that are with us right now.
You clowns crack me up! For thirty years you've been claiming that the ever rising temps were solely derived from CO2. Glad to see you have abandoned the false theory of CO2 as a cause and have accepted the fact that solar radiation is THE driving force for global temps. Must suck to be you.
Shakles -
I just provided links which show that sun spot activity has not been in sync with rising temperatures for 40 years. I think that is worth considering.
I don't think many of us are bigs fans of Al Gore, but then the debate isn't really about the people, it's about the real effects on our planet. Yes, there are sceptical scientists out there and I'm glad there are, but you must also realise its a small number these days. Not a single international scientific organisation backs there case - 50 sit on the other side of the fence. That says a lot to me.
Westwall -
Given the choice between having 0 international scientific organisations in your corner, or having all of them in your corner - which would you choose?
Westwall -
Given the choice between having 0 international scientific organisations in your corner, or having all of them in your corner - which would you choose?
That's an appeal to authority, a logical fallacy.
Westwall -
Given the choice between having 0 international scientific organisations in your corner, or having all of them in your corner - which would you choose?
That's an appeal to authority, a logical fallacy.
What do call your appeal to no authority?
Westwall -
Given the choice between having 0 international scientific organisations in your corner, or having all of them in your corner - which would you choose?
That's an appeal to authority, a logical fallacy.
What do call your appeal to no authority?
Westwall -
Given the choice between having 0 international scientific organisations in your corner, or having all of them in your corner - which would you choose?
That's an appeal to authority, a logical fallacy.
