JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #121
The only one's hindsight on that matter, of course, is this: would Lincoln have inflexibly insisted on perpetual union based on (1) recognition of electoral, constitutional process, (2) no slavery in the territories, and (3) federal supremacy over federal institutions in the south.
And I don't know if he would or would not, but I suspect he would still do it and have exercised dictatorial power that much more quickly in order to end the secession.
And I don't know if he would or would not, but I suspect he would still do it and have exercised dictatorial power that much more quickly in order to end the secession.
I think it was worth it, but I doubt that the war could have been prevented, either, with the defeat of Clay in 1844. 2 million casualties, 600000 (at least) dead, and maybe a 100000 more civilians dead.
I agree, but was unity worth 600,000 dead? Or was it 600,000 casualties?
I just can't wrap my head around it. Of course, we have the power of hindsight, but national unity worth 600,000? I can come to no other conclusion than 600,000 dead to maintain a country was about 600,000 too many.