NC Newspaper: Young Girls Must Overcome “Discomfort” of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Rooms

That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.
 
We are WAYY too uptight as a country when it comes to nudity in general. Funny how we have no problem gunning each other down to the tune of 10,000 corpses annually, but we're afraid our kids will be ruined for life if they catch sight of a penis.

Fucking weird ass country.
We need to be in a situation where degenerate leftists are dangling from lamposts from ropes, with their legs kicking and their hands grabbing at and their fingers working overtime trying to untie the knot wrapped tightly around their subhuman unamerican throats..while their flesh turns blue as they head towards their last breath.

But that could result in public involuntary erections and ejaculations, which we all know leads to the depravity of all youth. What do you do to the dead offender then? Kill him again?
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
 
unreal, one of the advocates that is pushing for transgender access to restrooms in North Carolina is a convicted sex offender

Convicted Sex Offender Leads Transgender Rights Effort in North Carolina - Breitbart

Sevearance and his group have taken a lead role in seeking the right to allow males to use the restrooms and showers of females, including those of little girls, which is described by advocates as nothing more than nondiscrimination measures. Sevearance was quoted in the Charlotte Observer saying that because a recent bathroom “nondiscrimination ordinance” bill did not pass, “someone can ask me to leave a restaurant because I’m presumed to be gay or transgender.”

In 1998, Sevearance worked as a youth minister and in that capacity allegedly lured younger men to his apartment to spend the night where Severance showed them pornography and tried to talk them into sex. One boy testified that he woke up to find Severance “fondling him.” Severance was convicted on one charge of sexual molestation of a minor.

As a result of his 2000 conviction, Sevearance must register with the police on a regular basis for a minimum of ten years. His most recent mug shot and registration took place at the end of last year.


I reiterate that if we would execute sex offenders, this wouldn't be a problem.
You have potential, Bill O'Reilly.

Dude, you have no idea how many people I believe are oxygen thieves who should be exterminated as the vermin that they are.

You're near the top of my list.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is consensual.
 
Last edited:
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.
yet you wish to open up the barn and let them loose with them. that seems inconsistent.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.
yet you wish to open up the barn and let them loose with them. that seems inconsistent.

Nope. I just wish to keep shit the way it was. It was working fine. Believe it or not, you probably got naked in front of a one-time woman in your life while in a public locker room, too. I think everyone will live if .003% of the population is made to feel a tiny bit less ostracized 100% of the time.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.

Really? You would have no problem with your 12 year old daughter showering with a 13 or 14 year old? You are friggin' perverted pile of shit if you don't.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.

Really? You would have no problem with your 12 year old daughter showering with a 13 or 14 year old? You are friggin' perverted pile of shit if you don't.

You're one scared little bitch, aren't you?


I have a 4-year-old son. This debate is hilarious to me. It's pure sexism. You don't hear anyone expressing outrage over the idea that young boys might see vaginas. Why? And if the transgendered women who are currently forced into men's bathrooms and have a proclivity toward rape go after my 4 year old son...what, that's better?

Fuck off and die you pathetic reactionary sack of smegma.
 
Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.

Really? You would have no problem with your 12 year old daughter showering with a 13 or 14 year old? You are friggin' perverted pile of shit if you don't.

You're one scared little bitch, aren't you?


I have a 4-year-old son. This debate is hilarious to me. It's pure sexism. You don't hear anyone expressing outrage over the idea that young boys might see vaginas. Why? And if the transgendered women who are currently forced into men's bathrooms and have a proclivity toward rape go after my 4 year old son...what, that's better?

Fuck off and die you pathetic reactionary sack of smegma.


Scared for myself? Not at all...concerned about little girls? Damn straight I am and only a pervert like you would be onboard with 12 and 13 year old girls and boys showering together. You have no moral compass at all. I feel sorry for your kid. I hope God looks out for him because you sure won't.
 
Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.
yet you wish to open up the barn and let them loose with them. that seems inconsistent.

Nope. I just wish to keep shit the way it was. It was working fine. Believe it or not, you probably got naked in front of a one-time woman in your life while in a public locker room, too. I think everyone will live if .003% of the population is made to feel a tiny bit less ostracized 100% of the time.
Well , then what if the general population of males feel ostracized from the girls bathroom? You gonna make them feel comfortable too?
 

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?
Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.


You keep repeating that -- but this applies to LOCKER ROOMS as well. Want to take another "whack" at it now?
 
Took quite awhile to find the original Charlotte Observer editorial. I suspected that "headline" was not a direct quote as multiple sources quoted it differently.. The editorial does not state EXACTLY that headline. But it does imply that. And it supposes this gender separation is soon ancient history..

Taking the fear out of bathrooms

This week, the Obama administration tried to get in front of the clash, first with a Department of Justice lawsuit over HB 2, then on Friday with a letter to U.S. school districts ordering them to acknowledge and accommodate transgender students. The letter doesn’t carry the weight of law, but it does carry a big stick – the implied withholding of federal dollars from school districts that don’t abide by the administration’s guidelines.

That threat is sure to bring more heat to the bathroom debate, but eventually the decree should have the opposite effect. It will bring acceptance, as these measures do, by showing that the answer to what happens in bathrooms is a lot less fearsome than the question.

That leaves the issue of privacy and the oft-stated notion of women and girls sharing bathrooms and locker rooms with someone who has different genitalia. It’s an image that’s uncomfortable even for some who are sympathetic to the transgender cause.

This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday. Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms – and vice versa – might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort – with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage – then realizing that it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.
 
Where have you been for the last 50 years? The site of a male's penis is not exactly going result in fainting spells in the girl's locker rooms today.
Just because all the women/girls you know are total sluts doesn't mean that others haven't been raised to be decent, modest people.
Hell, just let these pervs hose themselves off on the street. That might provide them the exposure they seem to crave.
Now those are some pretty dumb statements. Seeing a penis today does not make a girl a slut. In fact, most kids see penises in sex education often in elementary schools. Furthermore a transgender male does not show off their penis. They try to hide there genitals.
You say that as if you know this for a fact.
I read. Try it; you might find it helpful. Gender Identification Disorder has been well documented in a number of studies.
. It's a mental illness.
 
That's not quite true. The directive applies only to public schools. Only parents or guardians, not students can specify the gender identify of the student.

Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.

Really? You would have no problem with your 12 year old daughter showering with a 13 or 14 year old? You are friggin' perverted pile of shit if you don't.
He's a leftist...that usually means automatic degenerate pervert.
 
Here's the deal, the issue backfired on liberals big time but they still have their ace in the hole (no pun intended) with the liberal (sissie?) men who run the media. It's insulting to girls and women and that's the intent.
 
Even if that is true in some schools, it will quickly evolve into more liberal and easier acceptance of the mingling of the sexes once it has started.

The horror!!!!!

Boys and girls shouldn't catch sight of each other til age 60. Let's get all Taliban up in this bitch!
I suppose for you rape is conceptual.

"Conceptual"?

No, rape is rape. Unlike the Taliban -- and those who tend to align with the Taliban, like you -- I oppose men raping women.

Really? You would have no problem with your 12 year old daughter showering with a 13 or 14 year old? You are friggin' perverted pile of shit if you don't.
He's a leftist...that usually means automatic degenerate pervert.

Yep, there is no perversion that would turn the stomach of a leftard......it's "liberating" to them. (rolls eyes)
 

Forum List

Back
Top