Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
LOL you gotta admit , some of your brethren liberals have never met a loon they wouldn't defend (well unless that loon is a Christian, then they want that motherfucker killed b/c his thoughts are a danger to our very country)
Why else would you allow grown ment to shower and use the bathroom with your young boys and girls? Liberals do not value children.Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
Why else would you allow grown ment to shower and use the bathroom with your young boys and girls? Liberals do not value children.Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
there are mixed bathrooms, one women and one men. It seems quite simple.Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.
Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms
Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room
I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?
No, my reading comprehension isn't off.
I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?
The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.
But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.
Why?Why else would you allow grown ment to shower and use the bathroom with your young boys and girls? Liberals do not value children.Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
Not because everyone has to take a shit somewhere. We're using bodily functions as a cover for molestation! Because why?
I have kids, liberals have kids...oh but Liberals want them touched because people have to shit in one of the 2 bathrooms.
I'll be you: You want little boys to be molested, why else would you want them in the mens room?
Why?Why else would you allow grown ment to shower and use the bathroom with your young boys and girls? Liberals do not value children.Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
Not because everyone has to take a shit somewhere. We're using bodily functions as a cover for molestation! Because why?
I have kids, liberals have kids...oh but Liberals want them touched because people have to shit in one of the 2 bathrooms.
I'll be you: You want little boys to be molested, why else would you want them in the mens room?
Then why do you want them in the little girls room. And of course you completely skip the part about pedophiles ready and able to take advantage of obama's insanity. Obama does not worry about his privileged black girls does he?Why?Why else would you allow grown ment to shower and use the bathroom with your young boys and girls? Liberals do not value children.Liberals want perverts in with kids because liberals hate kids even their own. Thats the best boogey man story you can come up with?
Not because everyone has to take a shit somewhere. We're using bodily functions as a cover for molestation! Because why?
I have kids, liberals have kids...oh but Liberals want them touched because people have to shit in one of the 2 bathrooms.
I'll be you: You want little boys to be molested, why else would you want them in the mens room?
Thats what I'm asking you:
Why do you want trannies in the mens room unless your goal was to have them molest little boys?
You have a mind for chess, Tipsy.The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children. That's why liberal media like Salon is having so many sympathetic pieces towards pedos.
If you really think that people are just being all uptight for no reason, then just stop some random Dad on the street and tell him that you think his ten year old daughter should get comfortable with nude adult men in her changing and locker room and showers. Take his advice.
wow, so I see you still don't understand. wow.They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.
No, my reading comprehension isn't off.
I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?
The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.
But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.
Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.
Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.
Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.
Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.
if it is his gender, why not?Why did you want trannies in the restroom with little boys? To molest them?
wow, simply wow.This Frigid guy or gal or thing....whatever...is playing dumb. You can't really be this gullible and clueless? Can you?Pervs won't be peeing. They will be hanging out like the perv at Moorpark high school. Just get naked and be a weenie wagger.They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.
Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.
Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.
Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.
Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.
Playing dumb huh?
So, pointing out that pervs can go into male bathrooms and perv on people, but that seems to not be a problem. But being able to do it in the girls' bathroom, where they don't have urinals but they have cubicals, somehow that's wrong.
You think this is playing dumb?
Considering the retard in NC pushing this stupidity is a pedophile, tipsy is 100% correct. Stupid libtard!!!!The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children.
And they want to eat puppies, kill Santa, loathe Rainbows, despise sunshine
I love your screen name man.Considering the retard in NC pushing this stupidity is a pedophile, tipsy is 100% correct. Stupid libtard!!!!The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children.
Considering the retard in NC pushing this stupidity is a pedophile, tipsy is 100% correct. Stupid libtard!!!!The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children.
if it is his gender, why not?Why did you want trannies in the restroom with little boys? To molest them?
Tell that to obuthole and his dyke AG.Considering the retard in NC pushing this stupidity is a pedophile, tipsy is 100% correct. Stupid libtard!!!!The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children.
Whoa wait, a pedo is defending his pedo-ness? Wow, thats surprising. Actually its not, what is surprising is taking this guys opinion as being a serious one.
Salon took it seriously enough to publish it. That shows your camp's degenerate wing is influential, real and dangerous.Considering the retard in NC pushing this stupidity is a pedophile, tipsy is 100% correct. Stupid libtard!!!!The transgendered are just being used as the beard. The real intent is to get pedophiles alone with children.
Whoa wait, a pedo is defending his pedo-ness? Wow, thats surprising. Actually its not, what is surprising is taking this guys opinion as being a serious one.
