NEW: Bush Administration Ignored Urgent Warnings From CIA Months Before 9/11

Yes, but how many Ambassadors were killed on 9/11? Huh? Huh? Huh?
Even the life of a toddler in the preschool that went down was just as important as an ambassadors life. What does it matter if an Ambassador was killed or not..:uhh:

These retarded NaziCons don't give a shit about a dead ambassador - especially a gay ambassador.

Yeah dope, that's why we want the ones who left him and three other Americans out to dry pay the price. Are you in the firewater again?
 
Apparently the order was still in place from the Clinton administration ordering the FBI and the CIA not to share information or risk arrest. If Bush made any mistakes in his 7 months in office it was keeping the inept a-holes that Clinton appointed.
 
Lakooka is some under delusion I take anything he copies and pastes serious. I mean c'mon Huffpo and the Slimes? ROFLMAO
 
France burns and Lakooka is stuck in 2001
Anything to avoid to dealing with the foreign policy fuckups of the current President.

Bush gave us ISIS. Blame Bush.
You think you can stick your head any farther up your own ass shitting bull? We all know what a waste of time facts are with you but just for laughs and because the Mavericks game hasn't started I will remind you pointless as it is that when Bush left office ISIS did not control any terrority in the Middle East nor had they launched a single terrorist attack anywhere in the world. As we all remember when ISIS did start make their presence felt it was your beloved Obama who refered to them as the JV and blew them off as no big deal and since that time the JV has gone pro.
 
90


By CHRIS WHIPPLE - November 12, 2015

‘The Attacks Will Be Spectacular’

An exclusive look at how the Bush administration ignored this warning from the CIA months before 9/11, along with others that were far more detailed than previously revealed.

Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” The CIA’s famous Presidential Daily Brief, presented to George W. Bush on August 6, 2001, has always been Exhibit A in the case that his administration shrugged off warnings of an Al Qaeda attack. But months earlier, starting in the spring of 2001, the CIA repeatedly and urgently began to warn the White House that an attack was coming.

By May of 2001, says Cofer Black, then chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center, “it was very evident that we were going to be struck, we were gonna be struck hard and lots of Americans were going to die.” “There were real plots being manifested,” Cofer’s former boss, George Tenet, told me in his first interview in eight years. “The world felt like it was on the edge of eruption. In this time period of June and July, the threat continues to rise. Terrorists were disappearing [as if in hiding, in preparation for an attack]. Camps were closing. Threat reportings on the rise.” The crisis came to a head on July 10. The critical meeting that took place that day was first reported by Bob Woodward in 2006. Tenet also wrote about it in general terms in his 2007 memoir At the Center of the Storm.

But neither he nor Black has spoken about it publicly in such detail until now—or been so emphatic about how specific and pressing their warnings really were. Over the past eight months, in more than a hundred hours of interviews, my partners Jules and Gedeon Naudet and I talked with Tenet and the 11 other living former CIA directors for The Spymasters, a documentary set to air this month on Showtime.

The drama of failed warnings began when Tenet and Black pitched a plan, in the spring of 2001, called “the Blue Sky paper” to Bush’s new national security team. It called for a covert CIA and military campaign to end the Al Qaeda threat—“getting into the Afghan sanctuary, launching a paramilitary operation, creating a bridge with Uzbekistan.” “And the word back,” says Tenet, “‘was ‘we’re not quite ready to consider this. We don’t want the clock to start ticking.’” (Translation: they did not want a paper trail to show that they’d been warned.) Black, a charismatic ex-operative who had helped the French arrest the terrorist known as Carlos the Jackal, says the Bush team just didn’t get the new threat: “I think they were mentally stuck back eight years [before]. They were used to terrorists being Euro-lefties—they drink champagne by night, blow things up during the day, how bad can this be? And it was a very difficult sell to communicate the urgency to this.”

MORE: How the Bush administration ignored a significant warning from the CIA months before 9/11

Well, this certainly won't help Jeb Bush.

People may have forgotten, but upon coming into office, Bush and his administration shifted it's focus to supposed threats from the former Soviet Union, which should be no surprise to anyone since that was Condi Rice's area of expertise and virtually his entire foreign policy team were former cold war warriors still had that kind of mindset. In fact, on the very day of the attack, Condi was to give a speech about how the administration was going to rise to the challenge of what they imagined was a growing threat from a resurgent Russia. Naturally, that was all scrapped after 9-11.
 
Yes, but how many Ambassadors were killed on 9/11? Huh? Huh? Huh?
Even the life of a toddler in the preschool that went down was just as important as an ambassadors life.

Nope. The reason I made that post is because every time it is pointed out how many attacks were made on US embassies and consulates on Bush's watch, some tard comes along and asks how many of those killed were ambassadors, thus indicating they believe none of those attacks count if no Ambassador was killed.

Don't believe me? See post 23.

And then see post 24.
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head

Exactly! Bush created ISIS by disbanding Saddam's Iraqi army.

The U.S. decision 12 years ago has provided the enemy with some of its best commanders and fighters.

ISIS: How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled the Extremist Group's Rise
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head

Exactly! Bush created ISIS by disbanding Saddam's Iraqi army.

The U.S. decision 12 years ago has provided the enemy with some of its best commanders and fighters.

ISIS: How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled the Extremist Group's Rise

The U.S. decision 12 years ago

LOL!
Obama's weakness and idiocy is what fueled their rise.
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head

Exactly! Bush created ISIS by disbanding Saddam's Iraqi army.

The U.S. decision 12 years ago has provided the enemy with some of its best commanders and fighters.

ISIS: How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled the Extremist Group's Rise

The U.S. decision 12 years ago

LOL!
Obama's weakness and idiocy is what fueled their rise.

Yeah, Obama should have bombed Iraq when Nouri al-Maliki told him to leave his sovereign country.
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head

Exactly! Bush created ISIS by disbanding Saddam's Iraqi army.

The U.S. decision 12 years ago has provided the enemy with some of its best commanders and fighters.

ISIS: How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled the Extremist Group's Rise

The U.S. decision 12 years ago

LOL!
Obama's weakness and idiocy is what fueled their rise.

Yeah, Obama should have bombed Iraq when Nouri al-Maliki told him to leave his sovereign country.

No, Obama shouldn't have been such a weak, clueless President.
He shouldn't have made things worse in the Middle East.
 
The Iraq war ended years ago, ISIS rose to power because of Obama in Libya and Syria. There is no doubt.

As for Iraq, yeah you defeatists love to talk about Iraq a war against a tyrant just as debased as the Serbian leader. But you don't talk much about the ethnic Serbs that Clinton killed or the Chinese nationals. The Iraq war was won with few casualties then the left ever predicted and all objective met. Hell Saddam was even brought to justice by his own people. Instead of like Obama melding out his justice with a cruise missile.

As for Benghazi, the tragedy there is that it didn't have to happen. Why it is still news is because, without doubt, people died and Obama, Mrs. Clinton and rice, LIED. Why do people lie? Because they have something to hide. Too bad Congress is in bed with them or else we might find out what.

ISIS is fueled by many from Saddam's Bathe party. The stupidity and the incompetence of GW Bush unleached on the world the like of ISIS. Read history and you will see. We did not invade Iraq due to WMDs. We invaded because:

-DICK wanted to enrich his pals
-GW wanted to get revenge for Saddam's threat on his daddy's life and-
-GW could not get a drink to clear his head

Bush left office 7 f...king years ago it is time Obama grew a set and took responsibility for HIS foreign policy. You people are really quite pathetic.
 
Seriously, I am thinking we all should be carrying a gun. With the invasion taking place in both Europe and the US it is only a matter of time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top