hortysir
In Memorial of 47
Direct quotes sure are inconvenient!
Are you claiming that your OP is a direct quote from the CBO report?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Direct quotes sure are inconvenient!
Deductible up 66%, WTF?
Deductible up 66%, WTF?
You don't think you should have to pay some of your expenses before an insurer kicks in the rest for you?
Nice dodge, I have always had a deductible, just not nearly as high as now.....thank you obummercare.
Deductible up 66%, WTF?
You don't think you should have to pay some of your expenses before an insurer kicks in the rest for you?
Direct quotes sure are inconvenient!
Are you claiming that your OP is a direct quote from the CBO report?
Deductible up 66%, WTF?
You don't think you should have to pay some of your expenses before an insurer kicks in the rest for you?
Medicare spending growth just keeps slowing down. Projected Medicare spending over the 2013-23 period is now $116 billion lower than the CBO projected last spring. As they put it, "the slowdown in Medicare cost growth during the past several years has been sufficiently broad and persistent to lead CBO to project that [Medicare cost] growth will be slower than usual for some years to come."
Spending for Medicare is constrained by a rate-setting
system—called the sustainable growth rate—to control
the fees that physicians receive for their services. If the
system is allowed to operate as currently structured, physicians’
fees will be reduced by about 24 percent in April
2014 and will increase by small amounts in subsequent
years, CBO projects.
Sorry pop.....they cut payments to Drs......there goes your spin.
Premiums are cheaper than they expected when determining the cost of the law This became obvious last year when the actual premiums were first released but, to their credit, the CBO copped to it in their first projection post-premiums being announced. As they say: "CBO and JCT lowered their estimate of average premiums for insurance coverage through exchanges in 2014 by about 15 percent on the basis of a preliminary analysis of plans offered through exchanges." Similarly, projections of federal subsidies per subsidized enrollee dropped by about 11% as costs turned out to be lower than expected.
49-State Analysis: Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Premiums By Average Of 41%
49-State Analysis: Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Premiums By Average Of 41% - Forbes
41% is "less" than expected...busted spinning again pop.
CBO now projects that, over the 2015-2017 period, risk corridor payments from the federal government to health insurers will total $8 billion and that the corresponding collections from insurers will amount to $16 billion, yielding net savings for the federal government of $8 billion. By contrast, in its baseline projections in May 2013, the agency estimated that payments and collections for risk corridors would roughly offset one another."
Speculation based on rosy predictions. They cannot project an accurate number because there are no loss ratios yet pop....now even IF they pay out less in REIMBURSEMENTS to insurance companies than they have "projected" there is no "savings" they STILL payed out TAX DOLLARS to BAIL out insurers. More bullshit spin.
The part-timer myth is just that. CBO has seen "no compelling evidence that part-time employment has increased as a result of the ACA." Turns out anecdotes don't translate into data
CBO estimates that the ACA
will reduce the total number of hours worked, on net,
by about 1.5 percent to 2.0 percent during the period
from 2017 to 2024, almost entirely because workers will
choose to supply less labor—given the new taxes and
other incentives they will face and the financial benefits
some will receive.
This is from your link, sorry, the part timer issue is not myth.....who will be hurt"
Because the largest declines in labor
supply will probably occur among lower-wage workers,
the reduction in aggregate compensation (wages, salaries,
and fringe benefits) and the impact on the overall economy
will be proportionally smaller than the reduction in
hours worked.
The very same people you scream to get a "living wage".
Now.....why is this loss of employment less than expected?
First, fewer people will receive
subsidies through health insurance exchanges in that
period, so fewer people will face the implicit tax that
results when higher earnings reduce those subsidies.
Second, CBO expects the unemployment rate to remain
higher than normal over the next few years,
[BThird, the ACA’s
subsidies for health insurance will both stimulate demand
for health care services and allow low-income households
to redirect some of the funds that they would have spent
on that care toward the purchase of other goods and services—
thereby increasing overall demand.][/B]
LOL, your cherry picking as usual makes you look stupid...of course you counted on NOBODY actually READING your source.
Direct quotes sure are inconvenient!
Are you claiming that your OP is a direct quote from the CBO report?
I hope he is, because I actually have the report, and read it, and most of what he said is interpolation.
Are you claiming that your OP is a direct quote from the CBO report?
I hope he is, because I actually have the report, and read it, and most of what he said is interpolation.
You may have read it, but I seriously doubt you comprehended it.
Deductible up 66%, WTF?
You don't think you should have to pay some of your expenses before an insurer kicks in the rest for you?
What happened to keeping the plans we like?
I can think of few better examples of the old saw of turning a sow's ear into a silk purse.
Greenbeard wins this thread, just by virtue of all the limp-dick responses and 'attacks' on him.