The T
George S. Patton Party
- May 24, 2009
- 48,111
- 5,582
Nothing more needs to really be said here except those that will give lesser life forms priority over that of a Himan life? Arrogance on my part? *YOU BET*There are reasonable, and unreasonable demands for cleaner industry. I know that you used to tell what color paper they were making by the color of the river in my home town because the effluent was flushed directly into the river which loaded the area with CPBs (now cleaned and sequestered)."Physicians for Social Responsibility"...Are you fucking kidding. Get that liberal clap trap the fuck out of here.
You stupid liberals really do think you can exist is a federally mandated plastic bubble free of all risk.
One major volcanic eruption can emit more pollution than 10,000 coal fired plants. For Christ's sake..A volcanic eruption in Iceland last year shut down air travel to and above Europe for three weeks. What the fuck is wrong with you people.
Are you that eager to have government take over your very being?
Perhaps you're too young to remember what it used to be like when corporations and manufacturing businesses didn't have much in the way of any significant legal requirements on how (or even whether) they handled toxic waste and other pollution by products. They dumped them in the rivers and lakes. Of course, that killed fish and polluted water supplies used for human consumption, as well as contaminating the food chain.
Since there was no legal requirement to deal responsibly with the waste, individual businesses could and did make an argument that requiring individual businesses to clean up their waste put them at an economic disadvantage with other companies in the same business who didn't have the same requirement. It's a good argument, but it's not a good argument to do nothing.
Aside from that, it's a public safety issue. Even to this day, some companies dump toxic waste late at night in empty fields. What are YOU going to do about it? If you found out that was happening near where you live, do you think you would have the necessary power to put an end to it? Chances are pretty good that if and when you confronted company representatives about it, they would politely tell you to mind your own business. So, what entity could you POSSIBLY turn to in order to force businesses to deal responsibly with their toxic waste? I wonder.
That being said, there needs to be a cost-effect analysis of EVERY environmental regulation to see both it's practicality and effectiveness before implementation. Too often, we are protecting the goddamn worthless darter snail at the expense of 50k jobs and billions of dollars in profits for areas that are hurting economically. I know personally that the Sierra Club is suing to prevent a bridge across the St. Croix River because of the VIEW among other worthless challenges. The truth of it is that they want control over human development, not the view. Why? Because if you suggested a tunnel, they would have similar gripes and 'reasons' in which to prevent it.
We sacrifice the quality of OUR life for that of a worthless species that really adds such an insignificant amount to the biomass it's pointless to even mention.
You cannot go back to hunter gatherer society (but with all the conveniences of modern life) as you propagandize as possible. It is anti-intelligent, and anti-human.
If they cannot adapt? Screw them...same goes for that fucking lizard in Texas that has halted drilling...