New development in the shooting case of the black georgia jogger

[Polishprince]

OMG HE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD HE DESERVED TO DIE MAGA

I wouldn't say that. A lot of quality people have criminal records.

However what I don't like about this character who got shot was the smiling picture which makes him look innocent in the story. Sort of like the misleading pic of Trayvon that was shown. Since the victim here has a criminal record, why didn't they show his official Mug Shot instead of a high school yearbook pic

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

You are making a judgment there. That's not what the accused, who are granted the presumption of complete and total innocence, have implied. In fact they have suggested that the man who was shot had it coming and the shooting was justified.

For the media to try and taint the jury poll by putting forth as fact the Unproven theory that Mr. Arbery was just a jogger minding his own beeswax is unconscionable.

The defendants here deserve every benefit of the doubt, by law.


I think that any jury in a great state like Georgia is going to understand that. However, the campaign to demonize the defendants here,before any trial and even before they have had a chance to speak their peace, is disgusting. It is like to give the African American mobs the idea that it will be some kind of "injustice" if the defendants aren't hanged and will lead to civil unrest. Which, BTW, the Left loves.

 

[protectionist]

You have no evidence which to base that.

As to what type of person? Someone who saw he was followed, ambushed, who tried to avoid them and was confronted with armed men who were not police officers. Stand your ground. He had no way of knowing what their intentions were.

Of course there is evidence to base that. The guy was daffy. Only a nutjob would attack someone with a shotgun. And he was not ambushed, and attacking somebody with your fists is not trying "to avoid them." And just because you don't know somebodys intentions, doesn;t give you the right to attack and start punching them. This guy was a lunatic.

 

[protectionist]

You are making a judgment there. That's not what the accused, who are granted the presumption of complete and total innocence, have implied. In fact they have suggested that the man who was shot had it coming and the shooting was justified.

For the media to try and taint the jury poll by putting forth as fact the Unproven theory that Mr. Arbery was just a jogger minding his own beeswax is unconscionable.

The defendants here deserve every benefit of the doubt, by law.

I think that any jury in a great state like Georgia is going to understand that. However, the campaign to demonize the defendants here,before any trial and even before they have had a chance to speak their peace, is disgusting. It is like to give the African American mobs the idea that it will be some kind of "injustice" if the defendants aren't hanged and will lead to civil unrest. Which, BTW, the Left loves.

 

[Polishprince]

Many years ago, the local media made a big deal about a police officer in these part caught on tape beating on a suspect. A bit of an outcry, suggesting that he be "fired" for having the suspect held up when he hit him in the gut with is baton.

But what the media didn't report was that the suspect trash talked the police officer's mother. And that's what lead to the beating. It was 100% justified, but people seeing the tape without sound wouldn't have realized it.

Personally, I would never talk about a police officer's mum. But this guy was loaded and apparently thought that it was a good idea.

My point is that tapes have limitations. You aren't seeing everything.

 

[MacTheKnife]

Don’t know. Several possibilities. Why do it again if it failed to work? They were still pursuing him after trying to run away, they clearly weren’t giving up. Maybe the fact that McMichaels was attempting to confront him with a shotgun had something to do with it.

So what if he confronted him with a shotgun ? He's entitled to have a shotgun to defend himself from violent criminals- which is exactly what he did.

Yep....they were on their way to confront a black criminal suspect.....not knowing if the suspect was armed or not out of prudence they took their weapons to defend themselves if need be.

Entirely legal and very prudent.

 

[MacTheKnife]

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

Looks like that's what YOU'RE trying to do. He was shot in self-defense, while attacking and punching somebody. A criminal thug, not an ordinary citizen.

I can't buy the self defense crapolla.
1. He was one unarmed man.
2. He tried to avoid them.
3. They (3 men, two of them armed) ambushed him.
4. They were not officers of the law - they were, at that point lawless thugs.
5. He tried to defend himself.

That's a bullshit argument.

For sure and that is all we are seeing from the liberals and the msm....b.s. and more b.s.--trying to turn the suspect into a saint their usual modus operandi.

Hopefully the authrities in Brunswick
Ga. will not cave in to the political pressure....hopefully this grand jury to be convened will be competent and review the evidence in a honest manner and do the right thing.

There is reason for hope................In the last Presidential election, Glynn county Ga. where this incident occurred.....remained strongly Republican, 62.5% to 34.2% in the last presidential election.

 

[protectionist]

I have serious issues with armed vigilante citizens who perceive themselves to be judge-jury-executioner.

THEY don't perceive that. YOU do.

 

[Coyote]

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

Looks like that's what YOU'RE trying to do. He was shot in self-defense, while attacking and punching somebody. A criminal thug, not an ordinary citizen.

Exactly and with a list of felony convictions.....the guy was a criminal...cannot be denied....and he was not right....i mean by that he had some kind of mental problem the family is covering up. What type of person will rush to attack someone who has a shotgun...a person who is not right in the head.

A "list of felony convictions"?
When he was in high school, Arbery was sentenced to five years probation as a first offender on charges of carrying a weapon on campus and several counts of obstructing a law enforcement officer. He was convicted of probation violation in 2018 after he was charged with shoplifting, court documents show.


That's not much.

 

[Coyote]

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

Looks like that's what YOU'RE trying to do. He was shot in self-defense, while attacking and punching somebody. A criminal thug, not an ordinary citizen.

I can't buy the self defense crapolla.
1. He was one unarmed man.
2. He tried to avoid them.
3. They (3 men, two of them armed) ambushed him.
4. They were not officers of the law - they were, at that point lawless thugs.
5. He tried to defend himself.

That's a bullshit argument.

For sure and that is all we are seeing from the liberals and the msm....b.s. and more b.s.--trying to turn the suspect into a saint their usual modus operandi.

Hopefully the authrities in Brunswick
Ga. will not cave in to the political pressure....hopefully this grand jury to be convened will be competent and review the evidence in a honest manner and do the right thing.

A saint?

No. Just an ordinary person who did not deserve to be stalked and murdered.

 

[Coyote]

I have serious issues with armed vigilante citizens who perceive themselves to be judge-jury-executioner.

THEY don't perceive that. YOU do.

Of course THEY don't perceive that.

 

[Coyote]

Don’t know. Several possibilities. Why do it again if it failed to work? They were still pursuing him after trying to run away, they clearly weren’t giving up. Maybe the fact that McMichaels was attempting to confront him with a shotgun had something to do with it.

So what if he confronted him with a shotgun ? He's entitled to have a shotgun to defend himself from violent criminals- which is exactly what he did.

He isn't entitled to threaten people with it.

 

[Coyote]

Don’t know. Several possibilities. Why do it again if it failed to work? They were still pursuing him after trying to run away, they clearly weren’t giving up. Maybe the fact that McMichaels was attempting to confront him with a shotgun had something to do with it.

So what if he confronted him with a shotgun ? He's entitled to have a shotgun to defend himself from violent criminals- which is exactly what he did.

Yep....they were on their way to confront a black criminal suspect.....not knowing if the suspect was armed or not out of prudence they took their weapons to defend themselves if need be.

Entirely legal and very prudent.

They weren't officers of the law and he wasn't on any suspect list with law enforcement.

 

[protectionist]

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

Looks like that's what YOU'RE trying to do. He was shot in self-defense, while attacking and punching somebody. A criminal thug, not an ordinary citizen.

I can't buy the self defense crapolla.
1. He was one unarmed man.
2. He tried to avoid them.
3. They (3 men, two of them armed) ambushed him.
4. They were not officers of the law - they were, at that point lawless thugs.
5. He tried to defend himself.

That's a bullshit argument.

For sure and that is all we are seeing from the liberals and the msm....b.s. and more b.s.--trying to turn the suspect into a saint their usual modus operandi.

Hopefully the authrities in Brunswick
Ga. will not cave in to the political pressure....hopefully this grand jury to be convened will be competent and review the evidence in a honest manner and do the right thing.

That's usually what does happen. In case after case, white people (often cops) are railroaded by weakkneed politicians, pandering to the black community's extreme element, and trying to avoid race riots, and loss of votes.

Then it goes to court, the facts are brought out and the wrongfully accused shooters are acquitted (George Zimmerman, Betty Shelby, the Baltimore 6, Darren Wilson, Micheal Slager, Jason Stockley, Jeronimo Yanez, etc)

 

[Coyote]

OMG HE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD HE DESERVED TO DIE MAGA

I wouldn't say that. A lot of quality people have criminal records.

However what I don't like about this character who got shot was the smiling picture which makes him look innocent in the story. Sort of like the misleading pic of Trayvon that was shown. Since the victim here has a criminal record, why didn't they show his official Mug Shot instead of a high school yearbook pic

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

You are making a judgment there. That's not what the accused, who are granted the presumption of complete and total innocence, have implied. In fact they have suggested that the man who was shot had it coming and the shooting was justified.

For the media to try and taint the jury poll by putting forth as fact the Unproven theory that Mr. Arbery was just a jogger minding his own beeswax is unconscionable.

The defendants here deserve every benefit of the doubt, by law.


I think that any jury in a great state like Georgia is going to understand that. However, the campaign to demonize the defendants here,before any trial and even before they have had a chance to speak their peace, is disgusting. It is like to give the African American mobs the idea that it will be some kind of "injustice" if the defendants aren't hanged and will lead to civil unrest. Which, BTW, the Left loves.

We are all making judgements here. Unfortunately many of those judgements are about a dead man who can't defend himself.

 

[MacTheKnife]

BULLSHIT,,,running away always works

Well, that doesn't appear to be the case, if we go by McMichael's statements to police in the police report.

He ran the opposite direction.

They followed.

He died.

He died because he attacked someone with a shotgun

He wouldn’t have attacked them if they hadn’t been chasing him with a shotgun.

That makes no sense

people dont chase other people with a shotgun

they either shoot them or they dont

the jogger had to attack the man with the shotgun for them to have been wrestling over the weapon

hehheh yeh.....that is hardly rocket science.

Unfortunately so many are deceived by the msm....so many cannot think for themselve...have no ability to engage in a rational analytical thought process....too easily swayed by the propaganda from the msm trying to turn this black dude with a criminal history into a saint....and pursuing their usual narrative that all white folk are racist.

 

[Coyote]

The police department in this particular area has a pretty troubled history.

Georgia Killing Puts Spotlight on a Police Force’s Troubled History (Published 2020)

The shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery has renewed criticism of the police agency that released the two suspects. They were charged by the state months later.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Polishprince]

A "list of felony convictions"?
When he was in high school, Arbery was sentenced to five years probation as a first offender on charges of carrying a weapon on campus and several counts of obstructing a law enforcement officer. He was convicted of probation violation in 2018 after he was charged with shoplifting, court documents show.


That's not much.

Obstruction is serious offense, dozens of US Senators said that it wasn't just serious, it was very serious and qualified as a "high crime" in their estimation.

 

[MacTheKnife]

OMG HE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD HE DESERVED TO DIE MAGA

I wouldn't say that. A lot of quality people have criminal records.

However what I don't like about this character who got shot was the smiling picture which makes him look innocent in the story. Sort of like the misleading pic of Trayvon that was shown. Since the victim here has a criminal record, why didn't they show his official Mug Shot instead of a high school yearbook pic

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

You are making a judgment there. That's not what the accused, who are granted the presumption of complete and total innocence, have implied. In fact they have suggested that the man who was shot had it coming and the shooting was justified.

For the media to try and taint the jury poll by putting forth as fact the Unproven theory that Mr. Arbery was just a jogger minding his own beeswax is unconscionable.

The defendants here deserve every benefit of the doubt, by law.


I think that any jury in a great state like Georgia is going to understand that. However, the campaign to demonize the defendants here,before any trial and even before they have had a chance to speak their peace, is disgusting. It is like to give the African American mobs the idea that it will be some kind of "injustice" if the defendants aren't hanged and will lead to civil unrest. Which, BTW, the Left loves.

We are all making judgements here. Unfortunately many of those judgements are about a dead man who can't defend himself.

I have yet to see you be right about anything......there is no way to defend the dead black guy...the video proves that....you cannot defend someone who attacks someone with a shotgun .....how crazy is that...especially when it can easily be seen he could have kept running on down the road....nothing to stop him from doing that.

 

[MacTheKnife]

The police department in this particular area has a pretty troubled history.

Georgia Killing Puts Spotlight on a Police Force’s Troubled History (Published 2020)

The shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery has renewed criticism of the police agency that released the two suspects. They were charged by the state months later.

www.nytimes.com

That has nothing to do with this case....just a distraction...we are trying to present the truth...and prevent the legal lynching of two innocent white men....like we also fought to defend George Zimmerman...in a very similar case...though at least these guys have a video of the black guy attacking....not a innocent victim...a criminal guilty of assault just like Trayvon but with visual proof in this case.

 

[Coyote]

OMG HE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD HE DESERVED TO DIE MAGA

I wouldn't say that. A lot of quality people have criminal records.

However what I don't like about this character who got shot was the smiling picture which makes him look innocent in the story. Sort of like the misleading pic of Trayvon that was shown. Since the victim here has a criminal record, why didn't they show his official Mug Shot instead of a high school yearbook pic

Because when he was gunned down he was just an ordinary citizen jogging. Seems like that would be the picture you would show. Unless of course you're trying to influence people's perceptions.

You are making a judgment there. That's not what the accused, who are granted the presumption of complete and total innocence, have implied. In fact they have suggested that the man who was shot had it coming and the shooting was justified.

For the media to try and taint the jury poll by putting forth as fact the Unproven theory that Mr. Arbery was just a jogger minding his own beeswax is unconscionable.

The defendants here deserve every benefit of the doubt, by law.


I think that any jury in a great state like Georgia is going to understand that. However, the campaign to demonize the defendants here,before any trial and even before they have had a chance to speak their peace, is disgusting. It is like to give the African American mobs the idea that it will be some kind of "injustice" if the defendants aren't hanged and will lead to civil unrest. Which, BTW, the Left loves.

We are all making judgements here. Unfortunately many of those judgements are about a dead man who can't defend himself.

I have yet to see you be right about anything......there is no way to defend the dead black guy...the video proves that....you cannot defend someone who attacks someone with a shotgun .....how crazy is that...especially when it can easily be seen he could have kept running on down the road....nothing to stop him from doing that.

The video proves nothing, at least not what you think since you can't see exactly what occurred. What you CAN see is he tried to avoid them.