New house speaker's latest financial disclosure

[Meister]

How do you figure he isn't part of the swamp? Sounds to me like a guy lying about his assets would be very much in the middle of the swamp.

He's lying about his assets? Really?
Show us that link, okay?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, he must be breaking the law, right?

If there is a law about lying on those disclosures... which, there isnt...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Well, he must be breaking the law, right?
If not, the democrats will make one up to hang his ass.

He is breaking the law that says he has to disclose his financial assets.

 

[Meister]

Joe speaks fine. Especially compared to his opponent, who has the vocabulary of an 8 year old.

sure he does.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He's lying about his assets? Really?
Show us that link, okay?

He obviously is. No bank accounts? No investments? Yep, he is lying.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

sure he does.

Yep. Which you would know, if you watched an actual speech from him instead of rhe blurbs spoonfed to you.

 

[Meister]

He is breaking the law that says he has to disclose his financial assets.

Show us his financial assets to prove your point.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Show us his financial assets to prove your point.

What if I told you that nobody cares if some rando contrarian is not convicned?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Show us his financial assets to prove your point.

Either he is breaking the law or he is totally inept and broke despite his pay and all his past work as a lawyer. Not sure that is who we want with control of the US purse strings.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Joe speaks fine. Especially compared to his opponent, who has the vocabulary of an 8 year old.

Actually his opponent has the vocabulary of a 4th grader

 

[Meister]

What if I told you that nobody cares if some rando contrarian is not convicned?

Seems that Johnson has triggered the left, that is my point.
He's not a roll over like McCarthy was, and every democrat voted to
remove McCarthy. That is priceless.
Johnson couldn't have happened without the democrats blessing.
Now they are upset?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Seems that Johnson has triggered the left, that is my point.
He's not a roll over like McCarthy was, and every democrat voted to
remove McCarthy. That is priceless.
Johnson couldn't have happened without the democrats blessing.
Now they are upset?

Most I know are happy at him being there, he is almost guaranteed to hand the House back to the Dems

 

[Rawley]

It’s the utter lack that’s suspicious. Does he live with mom? Does he live off his wife? Lack of evidence can be damning

LOL Like ya'll chanting NO EVIDENCE any time anyone raises Simp Joey's criminality?

 

[whitehall]

After we saw Pelosi's husband's phony real estate deals and insider stock tips the left wants to talk about Johnson's records?

 

[Moonglow]

Shows no assets. Not even a checking account. Nothing. Zero assets. No investments, no properties, nothing.

Seems pretty unlikely, don't you think? A congressman, even a back bencher, with no assets at all? Used to be a lawyer, won some pretty big settlements too, where is it all?

Mike Johnson Has Never Reported Having a Bank Account

Daily Beast: "Over the course of seven years, Johnson has never reported a checking or savings account in his name, nor in the name of his wife or any of his children, disclosures show. In fact, he doesn’t appear to have money stashed in any investments, with his latest filing—covering 2022—sh

politicalwire.com

He lives in the basement of his Mama's house.

 

[BackAgain]

It’s the utter lack that’s suspicious. Does he live with mom? Does he live off his wife? Lack of evidence can be damning, because who would believe it? If a Dem was this sketchy, you’d be all over it.

Lol.

Worry about it.

 

[Nostra]

It’s the utter lack that’s suspicious. Does he live with mom? Does he live off his wife? Lack of evidence can be damning, because who would believe it? If a Dem was this sketchy, you’d be all over it.

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, SO HE IS GUILTY !

you clowns are a hoot.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Seems that Johnson has triggered the left, that is my point.

He's not a roll over like McCarthy was, and every democrat voted to
remove McCarthy. That is priceless.
Johnson couldn't have happened without the democrats blessing.
Now they are upset?

Well that's a useless and childish point. But thanks for chiming in.

More to the point that would be that his lies don't trigger the cult, and for obvious reasons.

 

[Nostra]

Either he is breaking the law or he is totally inept and broke despite his pay and all his past work as a lawyer. Not sure that is who we want with control of the US purse strings.

That is some mighty fine crawfishing right there.

 

[Care4all]

That would be the correct motorcycle. actually, their true anger is due to not having anything to rant about, so they rant about that.

So, you do not find it weird that he has no checking account to pay his bills?

Or is he purposely hiding his assets for some kind of reason? Maybe he thinks it is wrong for we the people to know? Or maybe he didn't understand the disclosure? Or just lazy?

Disclosure is required by laws governing them for a reason....

Where does his paycheck get deposited? Or who continually cashes it for him? Does he and family not own a home? Which is very possible, I suppose?

And yeah, any thinking mind would wonder why he has zero assets at this stage in life with a law degree, or wonder why he obviously is simply lying about having no assets? OR appears to be hiding something?

Yes, of course some partisan looked in to it and wanted and hoped to find something, but that does not quell the questions on it, that have risen from it!

NOTE! IF ANY OF THIS IS EVEN TRUE!?!?!