New Twist to Thug Killing!

[SavannahMann]

Apparently, it wasn't the first time the thug was seen wondering around the neighborhood casing houses:

The Feb. 11 encounter had been prompted by a motion-sensor security camera video in the construction site that had pinged the property owner who was two hours away. The owner, Larry English, texted the video to Perez, who lived near the construction site.

Perez, who has spoken to the GBI, had offered to keep watch, and told English he’d be happy to check on the property any time. English told the AJC that he did not know the McMichaels or provide them with any camera footage. Nothing was taken from his property, he said.

Perez said he was armed when he left his home and walked up Satilla Drive that night. As he walked toward the house under construction, Perez said Travis McMichael drove up from the opposite direction, and stopped his truck.

“Travis saw him in the yard and Travis stopped,” Perez told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Tuesday. “He confronted (the man) halfway into the yard. He said (the man) reached for his waistband, and Travis got spooked and went down the road. “

When McMichael returned, his father, Gregory McMichael, was with him and armed, said Perez, who added the elder McMichael had called the Glynn County Police Department.

Suspects in Arbery shooting had earlier neighborhood confrontation

Less than two weeks before the Feb. 23 incident that left Ahmaud Arbery fatally shot in a suburb outside Brunswick, the father and son charged in the case had a confrontation with a young black man who had entered a neighboring house under construction, according to a neighbor who helped in the...

www.ajc.com

So in other words, if something thinks the McMichael's are criminals, it will be OK for them to be shot in the streets too. And I'm pretty sure that the community will be a much better and safter place when racist thugs like the McMichaels are dead and gone.

When the senior McMichaels was on the force, he was given a desk job because of his use of excessive force on the job. He wasn't allowed to carry a gun or make arrests because he was a violent racist jackass. Instead of being fired, he was given the "Good ole boy" job of riding a desk until he could claim his pension.

There are a lot of white thugs like McMichaels, working for police forces across the country. More than 500 unarmed people are shot and killed by police every single year. And a lot of good cops get themselves into trouble covering for these assholes.

And you slavering racists run to thuggify their victims every single time. The police SAW that video and released them. I mean black guys get shot all of the time and cops are never sent to jail for it.

the McMichaels did not:
go where they were not supposed to
have a history of thugness/STEALING
..so you also LOVE criminals like AA and defend them

The McMichaels did. They armed up and went off in pursuit which they had no right to do. If they had caught and held AA it would still be Aggravated Assault and False Imprisonment. Two Felonies.

Once they set off in pursuit they were committing crimes. No matter how it turned out short of returning to their homes never having spoken to AA they were going to face criminal Charges. Or at least they should.

 

[jc456]

The McMichaels did. They armed up and went off in pursuit which they had no right to do.

says who?

 

[harmonica]

Apparently, it wasn't the first time the thug was seen wondering around the neighborhood casing houses:

The Feb. 11 encounter had been prompted by a motion-sensor security camera video in the construction site that had pinged the property owner who was two hours away. The owner, Larry English, texted the video to Perez, who lived near the construction site.

Perez, who has spoken to the GBI, had offered to keep watch, and told English he’d be happy to check on the property any time. English told the AJC that he did not know the McMichaels or provide them with any camera footage. Nothing was taken from his property, he said.

Perez said he was armed when he left his home and walked up Satilla Drive that night. As he walked toward the house under construction, Perez said Travis McMichael drove up from the opposite direction, and stopped his truck.

“Travis saw him in the yard and Travis stopped,” Perez told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Tuesday. “He confronted (the man) halfway into the yard. He said (the man) reached for his waistband, and Travis got spooked and went down the road. “

When McMichael returned, his father, Gregory McMichael, was with him and armed, said Perez, who added the elder McMichael had called the Glynn County Police Department.

Suspects in Arbery shooting had earlier neighborhood confrontation

Less than two weeks before the Feb. 23 incident that left Ahmaud Arbery fatally shot in a suburb outside Brunswick, the father and son charged in the case had a confrontation with a young black man who had entered a neighboring house under construction, according to a neighbor who helped in the...

www.ajc.com

So in other words, if something thinks the McMichael's are criminals, it will be OK for them to be shot in the streets too. And I'm pretty sure that the community will be a much better and safter place when racist thugs like the McMichaels are dead and gone.

When the senior McMichaels was on the force, he was given a desk job because of his use of excessive force on the job. He wasn't allowed to carry a gun or make arrests because he was a violent racist jackass. Instead of being fired, he was given the "Good ole boy" job of riding a desk until he could claim his pension.

There are a lot of white thugs like McMichaels, working for police forces across the country. More than 500 unarmed people are shot and killed by police every single year. And a lot of good cops get themselves into trouble covering for these assholes.

And you slavering racists run to thuggify their victims every single time. The police SAW that video and released them. I mean black guys get shot all of the time and cops are never sent to jail for it.

the McMichaels did not:
go where they were not supposed to
have a history of thugness/STEALING
..so you also LOVE criminals like AA and defend them

The McMichaels did. They armed up and went off in pursuit which they had no right to do. If they had caught and held AA it would still be Aggravated Assault and False Imprisonment. Two Felonies.

Once they set off in pursuit they were committing crimes. No matter how it turned out short of returning to their homes never having spoken to AA they were going to face criminal Charges. Or at least they should.

there is a law saying you can't drive down that street???!!!!

 

[SavannahMann]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

 

[SavannahMann]

The McMichaels did. They armed up and went off in pursuit which they had no right to do.

says who?

The McMichaels.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6915-arbery-shooting/b52fa09cdc974b970b79/optimized/full.pdf#page=1

When they spoke to the Police. Unless the police who responded were in cahoots with the Liberals and SJW types who were not involved yet.

 

[jc456]

there is a law saying you can't drive down that street???!!!!

So you didn't hear about that new law, if a black man is running on the street, white people can't drive on that street. Can't park either.

 

[jc456]

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence.

define pursuit.

 

[SavannahMann]

Apparently, it wasn't the first time the thug was seen wondering around the neighborhood casing houses:

The Feb. 11 encounter had been prompted by a motion-sensor security camera video in the construction site that had pinged the property owner who was two hours away. The owner, Larry English, texted the video to Perez, who lived near the construction site.

Perez, who has spoken to the GBI, had offered to keep watch, and told English he’d be happy to check on the property any time. English told the AJC that he did not know the McMichaels or provide them with any camera footage. Nothing was taken from his property, he said.

Perez said he was armed when he left his home and walked up Satilla Drive that night. As he walked toward the house under construction, Perez said Travis McMichael drove up from the opposite direction, and stopped his truck.

“Travis saw him in the yard and Travis stopped,” Perez told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Tuesday. “He confronted (the man) halfway into the yard. He said (the man) reached for his waistband, and Travis got spooked and went down the road. “

When McMichael returned, his father, Gregory McMichael, was with him and armed, said Perez, who added the elder McMichael had called the Glynn County Police Department.

Suspects in Arbery shooting had earlier neighborhood confrontation

Less than two weeks before the Feb. 23 incident that left Ahmaud Arbery fatally shot in a suburb outside Brunswick, the father and son charged in the case had a confrontation with a young black man who had entered a neighboring house under construction, according to a neighbor who helped in the...

www.ajc.com

So in other words, if something thinks the McMichael's are criminals, it will be OK for them to be shot in the streets too. And I'm pretty sure that the community will be a much better and safter place when racist thugs like the McMichaels are dead and gone.

When the senior McMichaels was on the force, he was given a desk job because of his use of excessive force on the job. He wasn't allowed to carry a gun or make arrests because he was a violent racist jackass. Instead of being fired, he was given the "Good ole boy" job of riding a desk until he could claim his pension.

There are a lot of white thugs like McMichaels, working for police forces across the country. More than 500 unarmed people are shot and killed by police every single year. And a lot of good cops get themselves into trouble covering for these assholes.

And you slavering racists run to thuggify their victims every single time. The police SAW that video and released them. I mean black guys get shot all of the time and cops are never sent to jail for it.

the McMichaels did not:
go where they were not supposed to
have a history of thugness/STEALING
..so you also LOVE criminals like AA and defend them

The McMichaels did. They armed up and went off in pursuit which they had no right to do. If they had caught and held AA it would still be Aggravated Assault and False Imprisonment. Two Felonies.

Once they set off in pursuit they were committing crimes. No matter how it turned out short of returning to their homes never having spoken to AA they were going to face criminal Charges. Or at least they should.

there is a law saying you can't drive down that street???!!!!

Arming up and in pursuit? Yeah. The neighbor was charged as part of the pursuit. Or did you miss that on the McMichaels are totally innocent webpages?

 

[harmonica]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

 

[jc456]

Arming up and in pursuit?

define what the pursuit was?

 

[Meathead]

Apparently, it wasn't the first time the thug was seen wondering around the neighborhood casing houses:

The Feb. 11 encounter had been prompted by a motion-sensor security camera video in the construction site that had pinged the property owner who was two hours away. The owner, Larry English, texted the video to Perez, who lived near the construction site.

Perez, who has spoken to the GBI, had offered to keep watch, and told English he’d be happy to check on the property any time. English told the AJC that he did not know the McMichaels or provide them with any camera footage. Nothing was taken from his property, he said.

Perez said he was armed when he left his home and walked up Satilla Drive that night. As he walked toward the house under construction, Perez said Travis McMichael drove up from the opposite direction, and stopped his truck.

“Travis saw him in the yard and Travis stopped,” Perez told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Tuesday. “He confronted (the man) halfway into the yard. He said (the man) reached for his waistband, and Travis got spooked and went down the road. “

When McMichael returned, his father, Gregory McMichael, was with him and armed, said Perez, who added the elder McMichael had called the Glynn County Police Department.

Suspects in Arbery shooting had earlier neighborhood confrontation

Less than two weeks before the Feb. 23 incident that left Ahmaud Arbery fatally shot in a suburb outside Brunswick, the father and son charged in the case had a confrontation with a young black man who had entered a neighboring house under construction, according to a neighbor who helped in the...

www.ajc.com

So in other words, if something thinks the McMichael's are criminals, it will be OK for them to be shot in the streets too. And I'm pretty sure that the community will be a much better and safter place when racist thugs like the McMichaels are dead and gone.

When the senior McMichaels was on the force, he was given a desk job because of his use of excessive force on the job. He wasn't allowed to carry a gun or make arrests because he was a violent racist jackass. Instead of being fired, he was given the "Good ole boy" job of riding a desk until he could claim his pension.

There are a lot of white thugs like McMichaels, working for police forces across the country. More than 500 unarmed people are shot and killed by police every single year. And a lot of good cops get themselves into trouble covering for these assholes.

And you slavering racists run to thuggify their victims every single time. The police SAW that video and released them. I mean black guys get shot all of the time and cops are never sent to jail for it.

If someone wanted to rape you, would you spread your legs?

 

[SavannahMann]

there is a law saying you can't drive down that street???!!!!

So you didn't hear about that new law, if a black man is running on the street, white people can't drive on that street. Can't park either.

Park? You call that parking? Really?

 

[jc456]

there is a law saying you can't drive down that street???!!!!

So you didn't hear about that new law, if a black man is running on the street, white people can't drive on that street. Can't park either.

Park? You call that parking? Really?

the driver was out of the vehicle and it was stationery, that's the only way that happens if my driving skills are intact. There's a thing on the transmission called park. one puts the vehicle in that state when one exits the vehicle. I see you do it differently. So you leave your car in gear when you exit your vehicle? amazing.

 

[SavannahMann]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

 

[harmonica]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

posted??? for what?

 

[Faun]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

Though some are trying to draw on similarities between this case and the Zimmerman case, there is a stark difference ... there was no video of the initial altercation between Zimmerman & Martin. All the jury had to go on was what Zimmerman claimed. Had there been video and such video revealed Zimmerman brandished a firearm just prior to the physical altercation, the outcome would have been drastically different. But there was no video.

There is video in the Arbery case. And that video reveals Arbery had a justifiable fear for his own life to warrant acting in self defense.

 

[SavannahMann]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

posted??? for what?

No Trespassing. Was the house posted? We’re there signs up?

 

[harmonica]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

posted??? for what?

No Trespassing. Was the house posted? We’re there signs up?

..I don't see anything in the law saying there has to be signs
AND he KNEW he was trespassing --don't try that stupid shit

 

[SavannahMann]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

posted??? for what?

No Trespassing. Was the house posted? We’re there signs up?

..I don't see anything in the law saying there has to be signs
AND he KNEW he was trespassing --don't try that stupid shit

Really? Nothing in the law?

The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law

Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime

arcdigital.media

Here is a long post by an actual lawyer.

Here is the actual text of the law.

Georgia Code Title 16. Crimes and Offenses § 16-7-21 | FindLaw

Georgia Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Section 16-7-21. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Now why the lawyer? Because the lawyer tells you how the law is applied. Arbury would have had to been told by the owner, occupant, authorized representative, or posted no trespassing sign that he was not allowed on the property. Since the Owner said he never told him. There were no authorized representatives. That leaves a No Trespassing sign. So which of these conditions were met to show AA was violating the law?

 

[jc456]

I am going with the experts. For some reason a Snake Oil Salesman in a he parking lot does not give me nearly the reassurance of actual professionals.

didn't the experts go with a conviction for Zimmerman? your experts aren't very good.

In Georgia he would have been guilty. Our laws are different from Florida. But Zimmerman got a fair trial and created the doubt the Jury said was Reasonable. I have no heartburn over the verdict. It is the way the system is supposed to work.

ohhhhkay Francis. The things you think you know.

In Georgia he would have set off in pursuit of a man who had committed no crime in his presence. As the McMichaels and their neighbor have learned to their sorrow. That is a crime. Under Georgia Law. As the McMichaels are learning. You can not claim self defense if you are the aggressor. The best that Zimmerman could have claimed was mutual combat. In other words they were fighting. Possibly involuntary Manslaughter under Georgia law.

Each State has different laws. And in each State the same action is viewed differently.

AA did commit a crime:

Georgia Trespassing 101

In one way or another we encounter sign posts with the above inscriptions posted on fences and trees. But what do those words mean? What does criminal trespassi

bixonlaw.com

Was the house so posted?

posted??? for what?

No Trespassing. Was the house posted? We’re there signs up?

..I don't see anything in the law saying there has to be signs
AND he KNEW he was trespassing --don't try that stupid shit

Really? Nothing in the law?

The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law

Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime

arcdigital.media

Here is a long post by an actual lawyer.

Here is the actual text of the law.

Georgia Code Title 16. Crimes and Offenses § 16-7-21 | FindLaw

Georgia Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Section 16-7-21. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Now why the lawyer? Because the lawyer tells you how the law is applied. Arbury would have had to been told by the owner, occupant, authorized representative, or posted no trespassing sign that he was not allowed on the property. Since the Owner said he never told him. There were no authorized representatives. That leaves a No Trespassing sign. So which of these conditions were met to show AA was violating the law?

The one where he was trespassing