Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

More and more misinformation.

First: General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is NOT International Law and is not enforceable.

All of the articles in that resolution are based on already existing international law.

(COMMENT)

Resolution A/RES/15/1514 (XV), unlike most resolutions, does not reference a single resolution that came before it. It would be most helpful to us all if you would reference one single Resolution that impacts A/RES/15/1514 (XV) or overrides the C-24 Committee.


........View attachment 276703
Most Respectfully,
R

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Why are those armistice border lines " fake" and where do you think they should be?

 

[Hollie]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

The borders that Israel maintains are certainly not fake. Just ask your dead gee-had heroes who tried to breach those borders.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

More and more misinformation.

First: General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is NOT International Law and is not enforceable.

All of the articles in that resolution are based on already existing international law.

(COMMENT)

Resolution A/RES/15/1514 (XV), unlike most resolutions, does not reference a single resolution that came before it. It would be most helpful to us all if you would reference one single Resolution that impacts A/RES/15/1514 (XV) or overrides the C-24 Committee.


........View attachment 276703
Most Respectfully,
R

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

The borders that Israel maintains are certainly not fake. Just ask your dead gee-had heroes who tried to breach those borders.

Ask where the borders are; you will never get a response. He actually misread my post and gave ne a STAR!!!!

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And once again, you are being less than honest.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

(COMMENT)

Israel may use any demarcation it wants, to identify its soveign territory. All that is required for it to be a legitimate is that one side of the demarcation, be under the Law of Israel and ruled by Israel.

The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states. The demarcation merely defines the territory being ruled by Israel. (Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States)

​

​

........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

More and more misinformation.

First: General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is NOT International Law and is not enforceable.

All of the articles in that resolution are based on already existing international law.

(COMMENT)

Resolution A/RES/15/1514 (XV), unlike most resolutions, does not reference a single resolution that came before it. It would be most helpful to us all if you would reference one single Resolution that impacts A/RES/15/1514 (XV) or overrides the C-24 Committee.


........View attachment 276703
Most Respectfully,
R

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Why are those armistice border lines " fake" and where do you think they should be?

It is not about where. They are not borders.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And once again, you are being less than honest.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

(COMMENT)

Israel may use any demarcation it wants, to identify its soveign territory. All that is required for it to be a legitimate is that one side of the demarcation, be under the Law of Israel and ruled by Israel.

The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states. The demarcation merely defines the territory being ruled by Israel. (Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States)

View attachment 276836
​

........View attachment 276831
Most Respectfully,
R

Israel may use any demarcation it wants, to identify its soveign territory. All that is required for it to be a legitimate is that one side of the demarcation, be under the Law of Israel and ruled by Israel.

Link?

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

More and more misinformation.

All of the articles in that resolution are based on already existing international law.

(COMMENT)

Resolution A/RES/15/1514 (XV), unlike most resolutions, does not reference a single resolution that came before it. It would be most helpful to us all if you would reference one single Resolution that impacts A/RES/15/1514 (XV) or overrides the C-24 Committee.


........View attachment 276703
Most Respectfully,
R

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

More and more misinformation.

(COMMENT)

Resolution A/RES/15/1514 (XV), unlike most resolutions, does not reference a single resolution that came before it. It would be most helpful to us all if you would reference one single Resolution that impacts A/RES/15/1514 (XV) or overrides the C-24 Committee.


........View attachment 276703
Most Respectfully,
R

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

Palestine has international borders. If Israel wants borders inside those borders they have to be negotiated with the Palestinians.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

And you are still being misleading...

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

(COMMENT)

The Charter is all about non-violent solutions:

To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;​

Conflict and hostilities are opened by the Arab Palestinians, whether that be by Gaza-Israeli Border → or challenges to the Article 43 Forces (Area "C") in the West Bank.

Nowhere will you find any exception to the rule of peace in which the Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Other than the Gaza Strip and Area "A" the Arab Palestinians have not exercised sovereignty. And even in the Gaza Strip and Area "A" Arab Palestinian sovereignty is questionable.

........View attachment 276828
Most Respectfully,
R

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Why are those armistice border lines " fake" and where do you think they should be?

It is not about where. They are not borders.

So tell us where they should be and why the Armistice Lines are “ fake”

 

[USAF 2023]

The resolution is based on the UN Charter.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

Palestine has international borders. If Israel wants borders inside those borders they have to be negotiated with the Palestinians.

Israel is supposed to " negotiate" with someone who refers to ALL of Israel as Palestine
Abbas Makes It Official: Israel is Arab Palestine


Israel is supposed to accept they will have no rights to the Western Wall
PA officials: Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall

The Israelis are supposed to brace themselves for Civil Wars inside the borders we hear so much about



https://www.memri.org/reports/palestinian-authority-supreme-sharia-judge-and-abbas-adviso

The Israelis are supposed to " accept" the fact they will never have access to E.Jerusalem again just like it was prior to 1967

In your " world" that's negotiation. Thank G-D you are the exception

 

[P F Tinmore]

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 was adopted on December 11, 1948, near the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The Resolution defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestine refugees to their homes. It resolved that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

Please give us examples of where they have demonstrated they would be willing to live in " peace"

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

Palestine has international borders. If Israel wants borders inside those borders they have to be negotiated with the Palestinians.

Israel is supposed to " negotiate" with someone who refers to ALL of Israel as Palestine
Abbas Makes It Official: Israel is Arab Palestine


Israel is supposed to accept they will have no rights to the Western Wall
PA officials: Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall

The Israelis are supposed to brace themselves for Civil Wars inside the borders we hear so much about

That logo is geographically correct.

 

[USAF 2023]

THANK YOU ! I am so happy you approve of my post stating they have " Right of Return" IF they were willing to " LIVE IN PEACE!!"
Apparently you didn't read it thoroughly

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

Palestine has international borders. If Israel wants borders inside those borders they have to be negotiated with the Palestinians.

Israel is supposed to " negotiate" with someone who refers to ALL of Israel as Palestine
Abbas Makes It Official: Israel is Arab Palestine


Israel is supposed to accept they will have no rights to the Western Wall
PA officials: Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall

The Israelis are supposed to brace themselves for Civil Wars inside the borders we hear so much about

That logo is geographically correct.

So what if it's " correct?" Still sending a message that he doesn't believe Israel has the Right to Exist. Notice you have Nothing to say about my other links, However, you have always chosen to ignore them.
Below is the definition of " negotiation"

Negotiation is a method by which people settle differences. It is a process by which compromise or agreement is reached while avoiding argument and dispute.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is just anothercasheof misinformation.

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Why are those armistice border lines " fake" and where do you think they should be?

It is not about where. They are not borders.

(COMMENT)

This is really getting on to be a struggle with you.

No one is claiming that the Armistice Lines were borders; lest of all the Israelis. When the Treaties with Jordan and Egypt were set in place, the Armistice lines dissolved. However, → the Israelis can use the track layout by the (no longer valid) Armistice Lines as a reference as to where the new demarcations lines are.

The new demarcation lines may:

◈ Run overtop the dissolved Armistice Lines.
◈ Run with nothing in common to the dissolved Armistice Lines.
◈ Run using the parts of the dissolved line, and independent tracks totally spearate from the dissolved Armistice Lines.​

But Israel does not dependent on the old tracks outlined by the Old Armistice Lines. This is different from the Demand on Borders by the PLO Negotiation Affairs Department that:

"The 1967 border, which is defined as the 1949 Armistice Line along with all legal modification thereto up to June 4th 1967, is the internationally-recognized border between Israel and the occupied State of Palestine."​

If there is a misunderstanding about the relationship between the 1949Armistice Lines, and the demarcation lines used today, it is the Arab Palestinian that is confused. As far as the State of Israel is concerned, the Article 1b - Defined Territory - Convention on Rights and Duties of States - is where Israel plants its flag and defends it sovereign territorial integrity. Israel enjoys the same rights and has the very same equal capacity that any other state might have, in their exercise sole authority over the territorial limits it defines (Self-Determined).

.......
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

How many did not live in peace?

Apparently you have chosen to ignore or not read any of my links interviewing Palestinians who plainly state the fate of the Israelis IF they become the majority.
Still haven’t told us why the Armistice borders are “ fake” and what the real borders should be

Palestine has international borders. If Israel wants borders inside those borders they have to be negotiated with the Palestinians.

Israel is supposed to " negotiate" with someone who refers to ALL of Israel as Palestine
Abbas Makes It Official: Israel is Arab Palestine


Israel is supposed to accept they will have no rights to the Western Wall
PA officials: Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall

The Israelis are supposed to brace themselves for Civil Wars inside the borders we hear so much about

That logo is geographically correct.

So what if it's " correct?" Still sending a message that he doesn't believe Israel has the Right to Exist. Notice you have Nothing to say about my other links, However, you have always chosen to ignore them.
Below is the definition of " negotiation"

Negotiation is a method by which people settle differences. It is a process by which compromise or agreement is reached while avoiding argument and dispute.

The Palestinians are the only ones who have compromised.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is just anothercasheof misinformation.

Arab Palestinians may issue threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Israel; for whatever reason.

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Why are those armistice border lines " fake" and where do you think they should be?

It is not about where. They are not borders.

(COMMENT)

This is really getting on to be a struggle with you.

No one is claiming that the Armistice Lines were borders; lest of all the Israelis. When the Treaties with Jordan and Egypt were set in place, the Armistice lines dissolved. However, → the Israelis can use the track layout by the (no longer valid) Armistice Lines as a reference as to where the new demarcations lines are.

The new demarcation lines may:

◈ Run overtop the dissolved Armistice Lines.
◈ Run with nothing in common to the dissolved Armistice Lines.
◈ Run using the parts of the dissolved line, and independent tracks totally spearate from the dissolved Armistice Lines.​

But Israel does not dependent on the old tracks outlined by the Old Armistice Lines. This is different from the Demand on Borders by the PLO Negotiation Affairs Department that:

"The 1967 border, which is defined as the 1949 Armistice Line along with all legal modification thereto up to June 4th 1967, is the internationally-recognized border between Israel and the occupied State of Palestine."​

If there is a misunderstanding about the relationship between the 1949Armistice Lines, and the demarcation lines used today, it is the Arab Palestinian that is confused. As far as the State of Israel is concerned, the Article 1b - Defined Territory - Convention on Rights and Duties of States - is where Israel plants its flag and defends it sovereign territorial integrity. Israel enjoys the same rights and has the very same equal capacity that any other state might have, in their exercise sole authority over the territorial limits it defines (Self-Determined).

.......View attachment 277121
Most Respectfully,
R

Post a map of Israel without those fake border armistice lines.

Still dancing, I see.