Newsflash: This Just In

Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.


bomb, knives, cars..............
you don't need a gun to kill.
Guns to help protect people in homes and if properly trained to carry.
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.

Less guns = less gun violence.

When guns were outlawed in Chicago, there was more violence.

Pretty simple folks.

Yes, your simplistic thinking was simplistic. And wrong.
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.

Less guns = less gun violence.

When guns were outlawed in Chicago, there was more violence.

Pretty simple folks.

Yes, your simplistic thinking was simplistic. And wrong.

Exactly ....liberals are the most simple minded folk you will ever encounter...this board is a good example.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.





Criminological studies show your assertion to be not just false, but catastrophically so. But, never let facts get in the way of a progressive moron.

Can the moderation on this forum engage in name-calling? That's interesting. Kind of cool if that's allowed here.

Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns? They haven't had a mass shooting event since. Do you know why that is?

Because less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty fucking simple.
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.





Criminological studies show your assertion to be not just false, but catastrophically so. But, never let facts get in the way of a progressive moron.

Can the moderation on this forum engage in name-calling? That's interesting. Kind of cool if that's allowed here.

Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns? They haven't had a mass shooting even since. Do you know why that is?

Because less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty fucking simple.

Australia doesn't have that pesky Second Amendment
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.





Criminological studies show your assertion to be not just false, but catastrophically so. But, never let facts get in the way of a progressive moron.

Can the moderation on this forum engage in name-calling? That's interesting. Kind of cool if that's allowed here.

Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns? They haven't had a mass shooting even since. Do you know why that is?

Because less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty fucking simple.





Yes, I do. Violent crime increased 44%. Then, when the police were able to put a bunch of them in prison for their crimes the violence decreased. Now it is rising again (as the criminals are released), and more to the point gun violence is now at a level higher than before the gun ban.
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.

Less guns = less gun violence.

When guns were outlawed in Chicago, there was more violence.

Pretty simple folks.

Yes, your simplistic thinking was simplistic. And wrong.

tough gun laws in Europe didn't stop the killing.

Tough gun laws only keep good people from defending themselves
 
Yes, I do. Violent crime increased 44%. Then, when the police were able to put a bunch of them in prison for their crimes the violence decreased. Now it is rising again (as the criminals are released), and more to the point gun violence is now at a level higher than before the gun ban.

EHHHH!!!!! WRONG ANSWER CUPCAKE!

Introduce yourself to some facts. Violent crimes have not increased 44%.

It's not the case, however, as suggested by the misleading and long out-of-date online piece quoted in the Example block above (which was written way back in 2001) that the overall crime rate in Australia has shot up since the NFA was introduced. The rates of various types of violent crimes (sexual assault, kidnapping, homicides of all types) have scarcely changed at all, and while the robbery rate rose substantially in the 1998-2001 timeframe, it dropped below its pre-NFA level by 2004 and has continually declined since then:

crimestats.jpg

And...

For Australia, the NFA seems to have been incredibly successful in terms of lives saved. While 13 gun massacres (the killing of 4 or more people at one time) occurred in Australia in the 18 years before the NFA, resulting in more than one hundred deaths, in the 14 following years (and up to the present), there were no gun massacres.

The NFA also seems to have reduced firearm homicide outside of mass shootings, as well as firearm suicide. In the seven years before the NFA (1989-1995), the average annual firearm suicide death rate per 100,000 was 2.6 (with a yearly range of 2.2 to 2.9); in the seven years after the buyback was fully implemented (1998-2004), the average annual firearm suicide rate was 1.1 (yearly range 0.8 to 1.4). In the seven years before the NFA, the average annual firearm homicide rate per 100,000 was .43 (range .27 to .60) while for the seven years post NFA, the average annual firearm homicide rate was .25 (range .16 to .33)

Additional evidence strongly suggests that the buyback causally reduced firearm deaths. First, the drop in firearm deaths was largest among the type of firearms most affected by the buyback. Second, firearm deaths in states with higher buyback rates per capita fell proportionately more than in states with lower buyback rates.

FALSE: The Real Figures from Down Under
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.





Criminological studies show your assertion to be not just false, but catastrophically so. But, never let facts get in the way of a progressive moron.

Can the moderation on this forum engage in name-calling? That's interesting. Kind of cool if that's allowed here.

Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns? They haven't had a mass shooting event since. Do you know why that is?

Because less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty fucking simple.
Overall, pretty much every type of crime either stayed the same or increased, actually. I'm as surprised as you are that CRIMINALS don't follow laws... really, I am.

Australian Gun Ban Facts & Statistics
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.


And?:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:

Guess what s0n.......guns are fucking flying off the shelves as we speak. Fucking FLYING!! :2up: And gun grabbing has never been less popular!!

Record-Low 26% in U.S. Favor Handgun Ban

Might as well be sitting on a stool naked in the middle of Siberia screaming "FIRE!". Nobody cares.:funnyface::funnyface::fu:


And the research shows beyond a shAdow of a doubt.......MORE GUNS = LESS CRIMES!!

Well........so says Harvard University in a recent study.......its not even debatable!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance:

Harvard study concludes that gun control does not prevent murders, other violent crime


Gun control is ghey.
 
Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns?

University of Melbourne researchers Wang-Sheng Lee and Sandy Suardi concluded their 2008 report on the matter with the statement, “There is little evidence to suggest that [the Australian mandatory gun-buyback program] had any significant effects on firearm homicides.”

Australia’s 1996 Gun Confiscation Didn’t Work – And it Wouldn’t Work in America

Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public’s fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearm deaths.

http://c8.nrostatic.com/sites/default/files/Lee and Suardi 2008.pdf
 
Less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty simple folks. Squeegee your third fucking eye.





Criminological studies show your assertion to be not just false, but catastrophically so. But, never let facts get in the way of a progressive moron.

Can the moderation on this forum engage in name-calling? That's interesting. Kind of cool if that's allowed here.

Anyway, do you happen to know what happened in Australia when they too away their gurrns? They haven't had a mass shooting event since. Do you know why that is?

Because less guns = less gun violence.

More guns = more gun violence.

Pretty fucking simple.
Overall, pretty much every type of crime either stayed the same or increased, actually. I'm as surprised as you are that CRIMINALS don't follow laws... really, I am.

Australian Gun Ban Facts & Statistics

No, they did not "increase, actually." See my above post where I already cited the facts. Introduce yourself to them, toots.
 

Forum List

Back
Top