Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The NFL NEVER contacted the casino to request video of Ray Rice brutalizing his fiancee ... TMZ Sports has learned. Commissioner Roger Goodell made his disciplinary decision in the dark, which raises the question ... Is that the way he wanted it?
Sources connected with the Revel Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City tell TMZ Sports ... NO ONE from the NFL ever asked for the video inside the elevator ... video that was compelling enough to get Rice instantly fired.
Sources who worked at the casino at the time of the incident tell us ... if the NFL had asked for the video, they would have gladly complied. Former employees have told us someone with an affiliation to the NFL saw the video, but we are now certain that someone was not from Goodell's office or the core NFL executives.
Without video ... Goodell blindly justified the initial 2-game suspension, based on the only evidence they had -- from the two people in the elevator, who called it mutual combat.
Multiple sources tell TMZ Sports ... the casino made a copy of the elevator surveillance video for police. We're also told Rice's lawyer had a copy of the video, which he got in the criminal case.
An NFL source tells us they requested "any and all information" from law enforcement in the criminal case but got nothing because it was a pending case. But the NFL had other options ... namely going to the casino or Rice's lawyer -- but the NFL never bothered to ask.
BTW ... it may sound crazy for Rice's lawyer to voluntarily hand over the video, but the NFL had a lot of leverage ... in the form of severe penalties if Rice didn't ante up the tape.
So the question ... does the NFL have incompetent investigators, or was it just easier to protect a player and turn a blind eye to video that would have forced Goodell's hand? Both scenarios are pretty disgusting.
Watch the entire video. It looks like he spits in her face and then slams her against the side of the elevator. She then rushes him and then he hits her in the face and knocks her out cold.Looks like he should be charged with felony assault and she should be charged with assault.
To me, it looks like she slaps him and he steps away, then she charges him and he decks her.
A man can't hit a woman. Ever. A normal woman has 55% of the upper body strength of a normal man. For that reason, he should be charged with felony assault. He put her life in danger.
But at the same time, women don't have the right to be slapping men because she doesn't like what he said. If she was slapping him, she should be charged with assault.
Looks like he should be charged with felony assault and she should be charged with assault.
To me, it looks like she slaps him and he steps away, then she charges him and he decks her.
A man can't hit a woman. Ever. A normal woman has 55% of the upper body strength of a normal man. For that reason, he should be charged with felony assault. He put her life in danger.
But at the same time, women don't have the right to be slapping men because she doesn't like what he said. If she was slapping him, she should be charged with assault.
********************************************************************************************
Ever? Where's the "equality" women demand if they can hit you but you can't hit them?Drunk/crazy women have been throwing punches at men since Adam and Eve. My brother Greenie calls this tape hip-hop foreplay. My first confirmed kill outside An Khe was a female VC....she had the drop on me.....her Kalashnikov dry-snapped.....my Colt didn't. Years later what I thought was a one-nighter turned deadly when my conquest decided to blow my brains out.....she got two shots off in a 12'x12' bedroom...the second one burned a patch of hair off the side of my head....she got punched, knocked out, and I took her pistol home with me....crazy bitch. Over the years I've slapped women who slapped me but not with a closed fist....that's chickenshit. But "never"? I think not.
I did not make that post.Looks like he should be charged with felony assault and she should be charged with assault.
To me, it looks like she slaps him and he steps away, then she charges him and he decks her.
A man can't hit a woman. Ever. A normal woman has 55% of the upper body strength of a normal man. For that reason, he should be charged with felony assault. He put her life in danger.
But at the same time, women don't have the right to be slapping men because she doesn't like what he said. If she was slapping him, she should be charged with assault.
********************************************************************************************
Ever? Where's the "equality" women demand if they can hit you but you can't hit them?
Looks like he should be charged with felony assault and she should be charged with assault.
To me, it looks like she slaps him and he steps away, then she charges him and he decks her.
A man can't hit a woman. Ever. A normal woman has 55% of the upper body strength of a normal man. For that reason, he should be charged with felony assault. He put her life in danger.
But at the same time, women don't have the right to be slapping men because she doesn't like what he said. If she was slapping him, she should be charged with assault.
Looks like he should be charged with felony assault and she should be charged with assault.
To me, it looks like she slaps him and he steps away, then she charges him and he decks her.
A man can't hit a woman. Ever. A normal woman has 55% of the upper body strength of a normal man. For that reason, he should be charged with felony assault. He put her life in danger.
But at the same time, women don't have the right to be slapping men because she doesn't like what he said. If she was slapping him, she should be charged with assault.
jimbowie1958 said:lol, you are delusional.
And if a woman hits me I will hit her back; equal rights, bitch
So much bullshit, so little time.Time for him to go go ?
Ray Rice VideoNFL Commish In the Dark By Choice ?
The NFL NEVER contacted the casino to request video of Ray Rice brutalizing his fiancee ... TMZ Sports has learned. Commissioner Roger Goodell made his disciplinary decision in the dark, which raises the question ... Is that the way he wanted it?
Sources connected with the Revel Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City tell TMZ Sports ... NO ONE from the NFL ever asked for the video inside the elevator ... video that was compelling enough to get Rice instantly fired.
Sources who worked at the casino at the time of the incident tell us ... if the NFL had asked for the video, they would have gladly complied. Former employees have told us someone with an affiliation to the NFL saw the video, but we are now certain that someone was not from Goodell's office or the core NFL executives.
Without video ... Goodell blindly justified the initial 2-game suspension, based on the only evidence they had -- from the two people in the elevator, who called it mutual combat.
Multiple sources tell TMZ Sports ... the casino made a copy of the elevator surveillance video for police. We're also told Rice's lawyer had a copy of the video, which he got in the criminal case.
An NFL source tells us they requested "any and all information" from law enforcement in the criminal case but got nothing because it was a pending case. But the NFL had other options ... namely going to the casino or Rice's lawyer -- but the NFL never bothered to ask.
BTW ... it may sound crazy for Rice's lawyer to voluntarily hand over the video, but the NFL had a lot of leverage ... in the form of severe penalties if Rice didn't ante up the tape.
So the question ... does the NFL have incompetent investigators, or was it just easier to protect a player and turn a blind eye to video that would have forced Goodell's hand? Both scenarios are pretty disgusting.
Ray Rice Video -- NFL Commish in the Dark ... By Choice TMZ.com
So much bullshit, so little time.Time for him to go go ?
Ray Rice VideoNFL Commish In the Dark By Choice ?
The NFL NEVER contacted the casino to request video of Ray Rice brutalizing his fiancee ... TMZ Sports has learned. Commissioner Roger Goodell made his disciplinary decision in the dark, which raises the question ... Is that the way he wanted it?
Sources connected with the Revel Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City tell TMZ Sports ... NO ONE from the NFL ever asked for the video inside the elevator ... video that was compelling enough to get Rice instantly fired.
Sources who worked at the casino at the time of the incident tell us ... if the NFL had asked for the video, they would have gladly complied. Former employees have told us someone with an affiliation to the NFL saw the video, but we are now certain that someone was not from Goodell's office or the core NFL executives.
Without video ... Goodell blindly justified the initial 2-game suspension, based on the only evidence they had -- from the two people in the elevator, who called it mutual combat.
Multiple sources tell TMZ Sports ... the casino made a copy of the elevator surveillance video for police. We're also told Rice's lawyer had a copy of the video, which he got in the criminal case.
An NFL source tells us they requested "any and all information" from law enforcement in the criminal case but got nothing because it was a pending case. But the NFL had other options ... namely going to the casino or Rice's lawyer -- but the NFL never bothered to ask.
BTW ... it may sound crazy for Rice's lawyer to voluntarily hand over the video, but the NFL had a lot of leverage ... in the form of severe penalties if Rice didn't ante up the tape.
So the question ... does the NFL have incompetent investigators, or was it just easier to protect a player and turn a blind eye to video that would have forced Goodell's hand? Both scenarios are pretty disgusting.
Ray Rice Video -- NFL Commish in the Dark ... By Choice TMZ.com
Why the fuck should the NFL be involved in marital affairs?
Another entity that has been nationalized by the socialists.
