Wobbly
Diamond Member
Because nothing says thoughtful rebuttal like an awkward I-know-you-are.Turns out she offended the bigot base on the left by not caving with a woke answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because nothing says thoughtful rebuttal like an awkward I-know-you-are.Turns out she offended the bigot base on the left by not caving with a woke answer.
Because nothing says thoughtful rebuttal like an awkward I-know-you-are
You think non-sequitur gibberish is a step up from your I-know-you-are rebuttal, or was that just the best excuse for impotence you could come up with on short notice?What was there to rebut?
You reap what you sow.
True. The northerners didn't care. But it is written that preserving the union was the excuse Lincoln was trying to use to get northerners to fight. Because northerners didn't GAF.And, contrary to what some Googler working on his GED said earlier here, "preserving the union" was the reason the North fought, I say Balderdash! It was probably Lincoln's highest priority, but the Northern population was more motivated by fighting against slavery. This was partly the result of the portrayal of slavery in the very popular Uncle Tom's Cabin. The biggest spark, however, was the Dred Scott decision. In deciding that Scott was property and not a person, (a legally proper decision, according to how our Constitution dealt with our original sin at the time), the Court was also saying there was no place for a slave to run and find freedom. Essentially, the Court had ruled that slavery was legal everywhere. The North was not going to put up with that. Fighting slavery became THE reason for them.
I mean, think about it. Preserve the Union? Bullshit. Who the hell would want Alabama or Mississippi? Wacko Floriduh? C'mon.
You think non-sequitur gibberish is a step up from your I-know-you-are rebuttal, or was that just the best excuse for impotence you could come up with on short notice?
If she attains a higher office she’ll be in a position to destroy more American heritage, history and culture.What difference does it make what she thinks the cause of the Civil War was?
What became of those emancipated slaves when they migrated to the emancipating north?It's hilarious watching your type wriggle and writhe trying to detach yourselves from the slavery detail.
If she attains a higher office she’ll be in a position to destroy more American heritage, history and culture.
That’s what difference it makes.
Way more than that.Oh, you mean like tearing down statues, ruining American icons like Bud Light, confusing people on what a woman is? Shit like that??
That's not what I said, but for the south it was about the ability to maintain slavery. For the north it was about maintaining power.It makes me snicker how “your type” insist the war was fought for the purpose of ending slavery.
Whilst supporting that flag in earlier conversations with voters.Remember, this is the same woman who had the stars and bars removed from the South Carolina, when that seemed to be the way the wind was blowing.
It was about the squeeze on the south’s economy and the impact abolition would have. Slavery was as common and necessary throughout the world as fossil fuels are today.That's not what I said, but for the south it was about the ability to maintain slavery. For the north it was about maintaining power.
Lincoln.Preserve the Union? Bullshit. Who the hell would want Alabama or Mississippi? Wacko Floriduh? C'mon.
And, contrary to what some Googler working on his GED said earlier here, "preserving the union" was the reason the North fought, I say Balderdash! It was probably Lincoln's highest priority, but the Northern population was more motivated by fighting against slavery. This was partly the result of the portrayal of slavery in the very popular Uncle Tom's Cabin. The biggest spark, however, was the Dred Scott decision. In deciding that Scott was property and not a person, (a legally proper decision, according to how our Constitution dealt with our original sin at the time), the Court was also saying there was no place for a slave to run and find freedom. Essentially, the Court had ruled that slavery was legal everywhere. The North was not going to put up with that. Fighting slavery became THE reason for them.
I mean, think about it. Preserve the Union? Bullshit. Who the hell would want Alabama or Mississippi? Wacko Floriduh? C'mon.
She should have answered it honestly....It was over a state's right to leave the Union.
It does not matter anyway, she will lose to Trump in her home state.
it was basically a "have you stopped beating your husband' question.I can't belive she claims the person who asked the question was a plant.
Wtf was so tricky about the question that it should not just be answered?