- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,644
- 53,545
- 3,605
Absolutely, that should be taken into consideration as well.They have every right to be hear, yes.“I think any woman who has felt violated or felt mistreated in any way - they have every right to speak up.”
WASHINGTON, Dec 10 (Reuters) - U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said on Sunday she believes any woman who has felt violated or mistreated by a man has every right to speak up, even if it is President Donald Trump they are accusing.
Asked how people should assess the accusers of the president, Haley said, it was “the same thing.”
“Women who accuse anyone should be heard. They should be heard and they should be dealt with, and I think we heard them prior to the election,” she said. “I think any woman who has felt violated or felt mistreated in any way - they have every right to speak up.”
Whether Trump’s election settled the matter was “for the people to decide,” Haley said.
“I know that he was elected but women should always feel comfortable coming forward and we should all be willing to listen to them.”
More: Nikki Haley: Women Accusers Should Be Heard, Even If Trump Is The Target
I agree! Trump accusers have every right to be heard.
Then we need to research their history, their motivations, and their reputation.
Sure we need to hear them, we don't need to automatically believe them.
You are completely daft if you don't think there might, just might be alternative motivations.
Then again, they might be honest, I guess we need to take that on a case by case basis.
What do their so-called "reputations" have to do with anything? What about Trump's "reputation"?
I have no doubt that Trump is what society and the culture defines as the quintessential "alpha" male.
I think, to that extent, you might be a tad jealous and hateful, yes?
I can't even begin to know the exact nature of his relationship with those women before the described incidents occurred. I can't even begin to imagine the contexts in which those incidents occurred.
At the time they occurred, I am sure many of them were not, "unwanted," but now, in retrospect, now that he is the most powerful man in the world, and these women have something to gain and they did NOT land him as their own husband, of course they have something to gain by saying this flirtation was "unwanted" attention.
Can we be certain that these women were not flirting back in any way? Do we seriously believe that Donald Trump just goes around doing this to just any woman that he wants?
I can't say I really know. Maybe he is total scum of the Earth, just as you say. Super powerful super wealthy men do get away with quite a bit. Then again, very beautiful, very shallow women, are, in general, very much the same where every you go. And their motives do not change, not then, or now.
Believe it or not, I agree with you, but I AM asking you to see the other side of this equation and not let your partisan hatred blind you.
I did some research on a few cases, and they look fishy, and largely circumstantial. They don't look that trustworthy, and these folks can often look motivated by power and money.
OTH, I'm thinking Donald really might have some control problems and some impulse issues if women show any interest at all in him when he was single.
It's really hard to tell when everything is so politicized.