Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 81,949
- 2,635
As abhorrent as those riots were, they weren't an attack on our country. Unlike Insurrection Day which was an attack at the heart of our government to prevent the winner of the 2020 election being certified so that the loser of that election could be undemocratically installed.Let's have an "bipartisan" investigation on how politicians enabled the BLM riots.So you are contending that a commission represent equally by both parties won't be bipartisan? Care to explain how you come to this conclusion?"Hiding" under the label of being bipartisan isn't trying to suggest bipartisanship will take place nor does it have the intent of being bipartisan from a Democrat perspective, thus the meaning of "hiding" under the label is appropriate in the context it was written in.How do you "hide" under bipartisanship?Democrats need to be able to hide under "bipartisanship"The D's can have their own commission now for as long as it pleases them to keep it up, keep it up
Bipartisan is what prevents only one side being able to influence the investigations.
It seems to me this is the GOP wanting to hide under the label of partisanship, so they won't have to deal with what happened.
You don't have a problem with that, do you?
You demonstrate how the right suffers from an abnormal brain disfunction known as conservatism.