Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
False. You lie, you liar. It’s what you liars do.You had no response to post #259. Therefore you’re a liar.
QED.
Still waiting on who made the statement you claimed in the op?Well, to know all of that I assume you must be on his legal team, right?
Fumblenutz lies along with the other liar.
Just remember, demofks can be led to water but need someone else drink it for themFalse. You lie, you liar. It’s what you liars do.
I proved you wrong the last time. But I’m not wasting my time on your bullshit anymore.
I already replied. You lie. End of story.
It has been published previously by many media outlets.Well, to know all of that I assume you must be on his legal team, right?
Some are worse than others. USMB seems to draw a lot of those tard leftist shitbags.Just remember, demofks can be led to water but need someone else drink it for them
Why answer such a patently silly question at all?It has been published previously by many media outlets.
The bigger question is why wasn’t he charged with having a weapon?Why didn’t he use it as a spear?
You didn’t prove anything.False. You lie, you liar. It’s what you liars do.
I proved you wrong the last time. But I’m not wasting my time on your bullshit anymore.
Too bad you didn’t. But your odd reaction to being told the truth isn’t my concern.
You didn’t prove anything.
Post #259. You didn’t respond to it.
Looks like he needs enlightenment.Why answer such a patently silly question at all?
Yea you’re full of shit and you know you’re full of shit.You lie. You repeat your lie. You liars tend to do that quite a lot.
You lie. We all can plainly see that you lie.Yea you’re full of shit and you know you’re full of shit.
And as usual Delldude likes your post because he doesn’t give a shit about the truth either.
Richard Barnett, the guy who put his feet on Pelosi’s desk, went to trial and was convicted of the same crime. Was his purpose any different?
The people who peacefully protested without breaking into the Capitol were there to be heard. The people who broke into the Capitol were there to disrupt the official proceeding at the very least. Some were there for much, much worse.
It goes beyond that. A lost tourist could have been trespassing. These people were there for a purpose. They were there to be disruptive and they ended up impeding the official proceeding.
And you will be fine with either outcome?
The judge in the Richard Barnett case, among others. Seems that they’re on my side in this one. So you have an uphill battle.
That‘s not a reply to post #259 either.You lie. We all can plainly see that you lie.
For example: No, Chansley Was Not Escorted Into the Capitol Building
The big question is why you are such a compulsive liar.
You’re proud of being a conspiracy theorist?
The reply is actually IN that post, too.That‘s not a reply to post #259 either.
So you went back, couldn’t find your replay to post #259, and tried to go with something different.
Whoops. Go ahead and keep digging. Maybe then you will figure out that you’re full of shit. Of course I don’t expect you to admit it even if you do know that you lied.
I am proud the vast majority become the truth.You’re proud of being a conspiracy theorist?
