Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observedIf you prefer to use the term, "Downward Longwave Radiation", that's fine with me.
Nothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
Ping me when you can actually post observed back radiationLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Nothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Nothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Ping me when you can actually post observed back radiationLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Test set that measured that. You do like to repeat your stupidPing me when you can actually post observed back radiationLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fake
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
About? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fake
Prove it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Baseline Surface Radiation Network: Contact persons
Let me know what they say.
About? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itProve it.
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Baseline Surface Radiation Network: Contact persons
Let me know what they say.
Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLLOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read it
Ping me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Baseline Surface Radiation Network: Contact persons
Let me know what they say.
About whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOLPing me if you ever find any backup for any of your erroneous claims.
Baseline Surface Radiation Network: Contact persons
Let me know what they say.
About whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Still nothing observed per OP. You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!So you can’t give up that instrument eh? LOL
Baseline Surface Radiation Network: Contact persons
Let me know what they say.
About whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Technology, it's a thing now.
Still no backup for any of your erroneous claims?
Weird.
Still nothing observed per OP. You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!
About whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Technology, it's a thing now.
Still no backup for any of your erroneous claims?
Weird.
Still nothing observedStill nothing observed per OP. You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout? If you can’t pull the information for me to review, ain’t worth my time!
About whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Technology, it's a thing now.
Still no backup for any of your erroneous claims?
Weird.
Still nothing observed
You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!
I agree, asking for links to back up your erroneous claims is funny.
What name did I call you? OopsThis OP demonstrates the willful ignorance that cannot possibly be overcome to offset the acceleration of climate change. Somebody will have to come up with an idea or new technology to address the climate if it becomes necessary.
Congratulations...you are the first one to step up and produce absolutely nothing with which to support your belief. I doubt that you will be the last....Nice that you also demonstrate the alarmist tendency of name calling in lieu of any actual evidence.
LOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observedIf you prefer to use the term, "Downward Longwave Radiation", that's fine with me.
Nothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
LOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Nothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
A few years ago I posted up a similar graph to Todd. It named the instrument used so I found the manual. It explained how the instrument worked, ie. no cooling. Then I found an industrial paper comparing and rating the various instruments, which gave the precision and accuracy throughout the range of wavelengths being measured.
You ignored the evidence then and you are ignoring Todd's evidence now.
If you think it is fake then present some actual reasons, with data and discussion that supports your reasoning.
Still nothing observedStill nothing observed per OP. You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!Yep, let’s hear how they read the lwir. Cold probe? LOLAbout whatever questions you have concerning their measurements of back radiation.
Technology, it's a thing now.
Still no backup for any of your erroneous claims?
Weird.
Still nothing observed
You asking for links of something that doesn’t exist is funny!
I agree, asking for links to back up your erroneous claims is funny.
LOL you prove it’s observed name the device that read itIt’s fakeNothing coming back, not been observed
Observed right here. Is the graph too complicated for you?
Never used graphs before you dropped out of school?
Prove it.
A few years ago I posted up a similar graph to Todd. It named the instrument used so I found the manual. It explained how the instrument worked, ie. no cooling. Then I found an industrial paper comparing and rating the various instruments, which gave the precision and accuracy throughout the range of wavelengths being measured.
You ignored the evidence then and you are ignoring Todd's evidence now.
If you think it is fake then present some actual reasons, with data and discussion that supports your reasoning.
Your instrument was measuring temperature changes in an internal thermopile...it wasn't measuring back radiation....again...so easily fooled by instrumentation...not surprising you believe in a radiative greenhouse effect in a troposphere that is totally dominated by conduction and pressure.
