Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the next President will replace, Scalia, not the present one. Right now I'd give you 3:1 that the next President will be 8 steps to the right of Ronald Reagan.A 5-4 SCOTUS ruling is settled law, at least until DC passes another law and a conviction under that gets to SCOTUS for review. Getting a Circuit Court to contradict a SCOTUS ruling is practically unheard of, so good luck there, Joey.
yeah, so why have you wingnuts been trying for 40 years to get someone to overturn Roe v. Wade, then?
And that was a 7-2 decision.
Here's the thing, guy, a lot of the awful decisions- Heller, Citizens United, are all going to be buried right after we bury Scalia. The courts are just waiting for that old fool to die off.
[
Guns are designed to give a man the ability to kill. Guns are no more dangerous than cars or hammers.
Yeah, somehow I don't think you are going to bring a hammer to a gunfight.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d5jXDvrOu4]Knife to a Gunfight - The Untouchables (7/10) Movie CLIP (1987) HD - YouTube[/ame]
Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
There are other ways to get around Heller.
The first one would be to overturn the absurd rule that immunizes gun makers from liability.
^Exactly. And that is the danger and the tyranny of a court.Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
Do you realize what a Pandora's box that would open up? Which company would be next to seek it? YOU don't think, do you?Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
There are other ways to get around Heller.
The first one would be to overturn the absurd rule that immunizes gun makers from liability.
^Exactly. And that is the danger and the tyranny of a court.Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
Only prescription is for Congress to amend the Constitution...but wouldn't recommend that with the current crop in the House and the Senate...
He does seem to side with criminals...and would love nothing better than to make life difficult for law-abiding citizens.Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
There are other ways to get around Heller.
The first one would be to overturn the absurd rule that immunizes gun makers from liability.
Why? Gun makers have no control over what some gangbanger in Chicago does with a gun they've bought in an alley.
[
Of course you are Joe.................You want to have Obama to put Liberal nut bags into SCOTUS............When you get SCOTUS, you'll push the issue on gun bans and get guns banned by a KANGAROO COURT Joe.............
Why Joe................Because you can't get even Dems in Congress to agree with you Joe...........
That's not true, Dems in the Congress voted for a sensible gun ban... they just couldn't overcome a GOP filibuster.
[
Because it's a FAR LEFT'S WACKO DREAM JOE..............It's your plan JOE........You can't push it through the Constitution JOE...........So you will try to enforce your beliefs through the back door JOE...........
You don't care about the WILL OF THE PEOPLE JOE...............
Guy, polls have show OVERWEALMING majorities support background checks, licensing and other limits on gun ownership to keep them out of the hands of crazy people.
Oh, for the record, from Miller vs. US to Heller, a period of 80 years, the Courts held that the 2nd Applied to MILITIAS, not individuals, and allowed gun laws.
And even Heller isn't absolute. Scalia had to do handstands to explain why Anthrax and Howitzers are banned four individuals.
You believe in TYRANNY JOE.............
We will not register our weapons Joe.........Even if you get this passed Joe............
You will cause blood shed Joe...............And you will not be the one trying to seize our weapons Joe...........
Because you are a COWARD JOE................
Yeah, I guess I do have a fear that a madman who was able to buy a gun despite EVERYONE in his life knowing he was crazy might shoot me or someone I care about.
I just don't see any benefit of letting you have a gun when I kind of susect you are one of the crazies....
He does seem to side with criminals...and would love nothing better than to make life difficult for law-abiding citizens.There are other ways to get around Heller.
The first one would be to overturn the absurd rule that immunizes gun makers from liability.
Why? Gun makers have no control over what some gangbanger in Chicago does with a gun they've bought in an alley.
And the No. 1 supplier of those weapons is just a short drive from Chicago, Chucks Gun Store in south suburban Riverdale.
From 2008 to March 2012, the police successfully traced the ownership of 1,375 guns recovered in crimes in Chicago within a year of their purchase.
Of those guns, 268 were bought at Chucks nearly one in five.
That statistic comes from a groundbreaking study by University of Chicago Crime Lab researchers, done at the request of the Chicago Police Department, which is grappling with an extra-violent 2012 that has seen a 28 percent spike in the citys homicide total compared to this time last year.
Joe.............Joe.............
You've never answered your comments about the pit bulls Joe.........
After you passed the law to ban that breed of dog, what would you do with the 100's of thousands of pit bulls in this country..............
Waiting..........................
Joe.............Joe.............
You've never answered your comments about the pit bulls Joe.........
After you passed the law to ban that breed of dog, what would you do with the 100's of thousands of pit bulls in this country..............
Waiting..........................
Euthanize their asses.
I don't play nice.
but that was probably because I knew a lady who got her face ripped off by one.
And the goal. An unarmed populace is more pliable.
Doesn't matter. They only care about gun deaths.
Why?
Because you can't resist progressive tyranny with knives.
And that's what they're really concerned about -- a populace that can't put up a fight against their totalitarianism.
Chicago now murder capital of U.S., FBI saysOh, grow the fuck up, you pansy-ass bastard.
No kidding. Joey doesn't care about his own liberty. THAT is evident.
Hey, Dumbass, if I have to worry about if I send my kid to the store, and he might get shot by a George Zimmerman, that's not "liberty" or anything like it.
If I have to worry about going to the theatre and someone bursting in and spraying down the place with a 100 round magazine... guess what, that isn't "Freedom", either.
You can live with your fear of scary black men, but frankly, I'm getting a little tired of living in a firing range because of your fears and sense of inadequacy.
Doesn't matter. They only care about gun deaths.
Why?
Because you can't resist progressive tyranny with knives.
And that's what they're really concerned about -- a populace that can't put up a fight against their totalitarianism.
Then you need to work on the absurd rule that immunizes fork manufacturers from liability for making people fat.Getting A SCOTUS to contradict a previous ruling Is the next step. No Law is settled where a Court is concerned.
There are other ways to get around Heller.
The first one would be to overturn the absurd rule that immunizes gun makers from liability.
[
Funny how you want to take away the guns from law-abiding people, but don't want criminals disarmed.
Are you now, or have you ever been, someone's prison bitch? Because you sure do seem to love criminals.
