- Nov 25, 2012
- 13,154
- 7,685
I disagree. A racist policy can have a greater deleterious effect than a discriminatory policy intended to correct a previous wrong, IMO. With the racist policy, not only is there the harm caused by whatever the policy does, there is the damage to the psyches of those affected, who are being told that their government and the society they live in considers them to be lesser human beings.
While that may be a danger with the discriminatory policy intended to correct the effects of the racist policies (a person might feel they are being told they are less because they need a leg up), I think it is less of a danger than with the racist policies.
Even if you consider it relatively unimportant, is there any particular reason you oppose different terminology?
There are no discriminatory policies intended to correct a previous wrong. The lie is what whites need to get out of their system. Whites were getting 100 percent of all the chances, so if there is a policy that says others besides whites can the same chance it does not discriminate against whites. Now if you think whites are entitled to 100 percent of everything, then you say these policies discriminate. There is no one getting a leg up because of equal opportunity policy. That is another lie whites have made up. These beliefs are racist and they need to end.
I assume you are published? Is this representative of your work?
Don't have to be published to know the facts. If you think hat policies made 50 years ago is anti white discrimination , what I the hell do you call he policies before that? Equality?
Every measurable metric in America proves that there is no anti white discrimination. In the minds of SOME, any favorable outcome for non white citizens is the ...
....
I stopped reading here.
No metric proves there is no anti white discrimination because there obviously IS.
As I have documented with the 230 point bonus study.
Yes, you have pushed that weak argument to the point of being ridiculous. Your "study" from 2004 that like more recent ones clearly illustrates that there is no appreciable decline in upward mobility within the white population in college admissions, nor the work place.
One of the most successful demographics in America are white females.....in every sector.
Your denial of these truths do not translate into the "mass anti white, conspiracy theory that is obviously an obsession with you.
Your issue just as the linked article points out that in the minds of some, like you, that any success by non whites mpre specifically blacks "has to come at the expense of the poor, maligned white population".
Paranoia.