Noah's Ark with two of EVERY animal

[Feeding Crows]

And they are the source of religions. The stories have just been altered over time.

 

[rylah]

It's the wrong fucking question because I didn't say anything that would lead to such a question as you asked.

I didn't say birds were fucking artistic. So why the hell would you then write such a fucking question?

Would you like a history of art from pre-historic times?

If so, go find one and you'll see lots of stylized animals.

If you don't want to know about such things, then just stop talking about this.

 

[rylah]

And they are the source of religions. The stories have just been altered over time.

Religions came waaaay later,
they're a relatively recent reform.

 

[Feeding Crows]

 

[Feeding Crows]

They are obviously different. And the gold model has been shown to fly and be aerodynamic once a propeller is attached.

 

[Feeding Crows]

 

[Feeding Crows]

 

[rylah]

View attachment 628542

 

[Feeding Crows]

Wow, does that look similar to you? Just looks tasty to me...

 

[Feeding Crows]

Are these two images similar?!?

 

[.oldschool]

 

[DudleySmith]

Literal interpretation of Genesis isn't held by the gold-standard of Christianity, Catholicism.

Well, it is literary interpretation that is required, a couple of levels of them at least being used in the allegories, rather than a 'scientific' one, but I get what you're saying.

 

[surada]

They are obviously different. And the gold model has been shown to fly and be aerodynamic once a propeller is attached.

Really? Who told you the gold artifact can fly? The body must be paper thin.

 

[frigidweirdo]

They are obviously different. And the gold model has been shown to fly and be aerodynamic once a propeller is attached.

Aerodynamic huh? I doubt it very much.

 

[Woodznutz]

"Believe" = accepting without knowing.

People can believe whatever they want. People can accept things that are clearly not true, they can bury their heads in the sand.

What gets me is people who BELIEVE and then come onto forums to try and act like their belief is actually real. If you want to bury your head in the sand, fine, but don't bury it in the sand and then try and act like you're not doing that.

This is the "Religion" forum.

 

[DudleySmith]

This is the "Religion" forum.

lol exactly. These posters don't sound like atheists at all, just a lot of terrified pagans and sociopaths having spastic reactions and zero clue what they're talking about.

 

[Woodznutz]

Well... it seems that the Christians here do not even know their own myths. Wow.

First:

Well, that is clearly what the ancient authors thought. In reality, fish would not survive a catastrophic flood, just would not happen. Fish have VERY specific environments they need for survival. The massive size of the ocean ensures that such conditions change VERY slowly. That would not be the case if there were a global flood as such would require far more water than the Oceans themselves even contain.

The flood waters came from the sea; "fountains of the deep".

 

[surada]

The flood waters came from the sea; "fountains of the deep".

You think there are fountains in the ocean?

 

[Woodznutz]

So, "Magic".

You can deem any obviously absurd or false idea to be true, using magic.

Evolutionist took that ball and ran with it.

 

[Woodznutz]

You think there are fountains in the ocean?

Fountains: Structures that hold water that were 'broken up'. How they were broken up is a matter of speculation.