Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where's Norway?
lets crank up offshore drilling and drive the price of oil way down !!!
Because the US system is shit.They dont get anything for free. Where did you hear that ?
You're right, they don't get anything for free.... unless you use the US Liberal definition of free, ie... "Someone else pays for it., or it comes out of my taxes".
Like most European shitholes, Norwegians get "free" healthcare, education, etc... Things that the US forces individuals to ay for themselves.
And they certainly would not want you living there.A whole bunch of people in nations that now have higher standards of living than the US like living that way.
By YOUR definition of standard of living, not mine. There isn't enough money on the planet to get me to live in one of those countries.
When you see this happen, letr us know.I love watching lefties get their ass kicked in the morning! Smells like....victory!
Because the US system is shit.
their populations are no where near the US and/or not nearly as diverseTOP 5 WINNERS
Canada
#1 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#2 in Best Countries
A typical Canadian consumer spends $28,572 on goods and services each year, according to the World Bank.
Sweden
#2 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#6 in Best Countries
A typical Swedish consumer spends $25,391 on goods and services each year.
Denmark
#3 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#12 in Best Countries
A typical Danish consumer spends $27,897 on goods and services each year.
Australia
#4 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#8 in Best Countries
A typical Australian consumer spends $30,354 on goods and services each year.
Norway
#5 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#10 in Best Countries
A typical Norwegian consumer spends $39,171 on goods and services each year.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/quality-of-life-rankings
The US ranked 18th.
When you see this happen, letr us know.I love watching lefties get their ass kicked in the morning! Smells like....victory!
As long as the US ranks higher in the Quality Of Life rankings than India, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan or Nigeria it's winning?their populations are no where near the US and/or not nearly as diverseTOP 5 WINNERS
Canada
#1 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#2 in Best Countries
A typical Canadian consumer spends $28,572 on goods and services each year, according to the World Bank.
Sweden
#2 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#6 in Best Countries
A typical Swedish consumer spends $25,391 on goods and services each year.
Denmark
#3 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#12 in Best Countries
A typical Danish consumer spends $27,897 on goods and services each year.
Australia
#4 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#8 in Best Countries
A typical Australian consumer spends $30,354 on goods and services each year.
Norway
#5 in Best Countries: Quality of Life
#10 in Best Countries
A typical Norwegian consumer spends $39,171 on goods and services each year.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/quality-of-life-rankings
The US ranked 18th.
Canada population much lower and much less dense
it is a lot easier to take care of the population if it is much lower
...your analogy is not that great
..how about India, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, ?? with comparable populations to the US...??
The government from the people to the people. They have better lives...who are you to tell them otherwise? Unless if you live ina better condition which is not the case.
If there were any self-respecting Norwegians they wouldn't be letting he Government manage their lives for them.
A bunch of ideological horse shit.Norwegians have expressed solidarity with Haiti and several other African nations by saying they do not want to go to the US, describing it using the alleged words of Donald Trump as a ‘shithole’ ..
The government from the people to the people. They have better lives...who are you to tell them otherwise? Unless if you live ina better condition which is not the case.