P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #721
Again....that is completely false. You're simply attempting to defend the Democrats because they share your ideology. You're not wiling to be honest.Because the other people who lost their jobs to "technology" did so as a result of a natural progression through the free-market. Not through government regulation picking and choosing winners and losers. Who is the government to decide that the coal industry should be bankrupted by regulations while the "green" energy sector should receive hundreds of millions or billions (like Solyndra)? Why not decimate Solyndra with costly regulations and give $500 million to coal companies?Except all of the workers who are now forced to live in povertyNobody will miss itThe death Of American Coal
There was a time in America - and it wasn't even so long ago - that liberals actually cared about working class people. They may have been misguided in many of their policy solutions - i.e., raising the minimum wage - but at least their heart was in the right place.
Then a strange thing happened about a decade ago. The radical left wing environmentalists took control of the Democratic Party. These are crazies who care more about the supposed rise of the oceans than the financial survival of the middle class. The industrial unions made a catastrophic decision to get in bed with these radicals and now they - and all of us - are paying a heavy price.
STEPHEN MOORE: The death of American coal
Why should they be protected more than any other worker who has lost his job to changes in technology?
Coal is losing its place in the energy market...been happening for 100 years
What about the jobs that were lost when steam locomotives switched to diesel?
Coal has not lost market share naturally. They have been attacked intentionally by regulations with the focus of putting them out of business. At the same time, the Democrats who are causing unnecessary costs intentionally are throwing billions of dollars at coal's "competition". Barack Obama promised he would put the coal industry out of business when he started and it's the one promise he has actually followed through on (unlike closing Guantanamo Bay or "fixing" the economy).
Why did Solyndra receive $500 million? Why didn't Solyndra get hit with costly regulations and ONE single coal company receive $500 million? Care to be honest or are you worried about these truths impacting the Democrats you are trying to cover for?