Now with the Colorado ruling saying that religion can override public accommodation laws

[EvilCat Breath]

Rigby you are just like the little fag lawyer that represented the lesbians that sued me, and my little business and lost so spectacularly. I could never show him how wrong he was either.

 

[Rigby5]

Discrimination causes no harm

DEAD WRONG FOOL

The whole point of marxism IS UNIVERSAL slavery


There is no such thing as an economic slave

Discrimination prevented Blacks from getting an education, eating at some restaurants, riding on some transportation, buying a house, getting most jobs, etc.
Discrimination is about the most harmful and evil thing anyone could ever do.

An economic slave is the basis of feudalism.
The baron was given ownership of the land, so then all the serfs had to do what the barons demanded, or starve to death.
Feudalism was economic slavery.

The whole point of Marxism is to prevent economic slavery, and give workers government protection.

 

[BS Filter]

How long will it be before some business refuses service to black people because they say it's against the owner's religion?

How long before an employer gets to refuse to hire a woman because the business owner's religious belief is that a woman should be at home serving her husband and raising children?

And how many other laws will get to be ignored on the basis of a religious claim?

None. People who say stuff like this on NPR, CNN etc are stupid. She serves people. She doesn't have to do business with someone who wants her to do something against her belief. If you have a restaurant, you serve everyone. If someone comes into your restaurant and demands that you cook them a steak with a swastika grilled into it, do you believe that you should be forced to do it?

 

[Rigby5]

Rigby you are just like the little fag lawyer that represented the lesbians that sued me, and my little business and lost so spectacularly. I could never show him how wrong he was either.

There are lots of corrupt judges, but they could have likely won on appeals, because it sound like you clearly believe in discrimination.

 

[BS Filter]

Discrimination prevented Blacks from getting an education, eating at some restaurants, riding on some transportation, buying a house, getting most jobs, etc.
Discrimination is about the most harmful and evil thing anyone could ever do.

An economic slave is the basis of feudalism.
The baron was given ownership of the land, so then all the serfs had to do what the barons demanded, or starve to death.
Feudalism was economic slavery.

The whole point of Marxism is to prevent economic slavery, and give workers government protection.

Bullshit. Marxism makes everyone a slave to the state.

 

[Rigby5]

None. People who say stuff like this on NPR, CNN etc are stupid. She serves people. She doesn't have to do business with someone who wants her to do something against her belief. If you have a restaurant, you serve everyone. If someone comes into your restaurant and demands that you cook them a steak with a swastika grilled into it, do you believe that you should be forced to do it?

No one was being asked to do anything unusual.
The web designer wants to refuse gay customers just for being gay, NOT because of any unusual demands.

 

[BS Filter]

No one was being asked to do anything unusual.
The web designer wants to refuse gay customers just for being gay, NOT because of any unusual demands.

She doesn't do same-sex websites. That's her right. Find someone who does. You're free to refuse to manufacture anything Christian in your business. Democracy.

 

[Rigby5]

Bullshit. Marxism makes everyone a slave to the state.

Totally and completely wrong.
Marxism essentially is employee own businesses.
It is collective, cooperative, and communal.
The workers are the owners, and have to democratically make decisions and share profits.
That is no state other then the workers, and it can't be a dictatorship if it is collective, cooperative, and communal.
Words have meaning.
You are trying to ignore the meaning of words.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Discrimination prevented Blacks from getting an education, eating at some restaurants, riding on some transportation, buying a house, getting most jobs, etc.
Discrimination is about the most harmful and evil thing anyone could ever do.

An economic slave is the basis of feudalism.
The baron was given ownership of the land, so then all the serfs had to do what the barons demanded, or starve to death.
Feudalism was economic slavery.

The whole point of Marxism is to prevent economic slavery, and give workers government protection.

That was all mandated discrimination which is just as bad as prohibiting it.

Discrimination which is voluntary harms no one.

People under feudalism had more freedom than we do today.
There is no such thing as economic slavery.

The whole point of marxism is to enslave the human race which is why every communist nation is and have all been nations of slaves.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Wrong.
Since there was no actual customer or web designer, there was no way any one could judge any pretend case.
There can not be a legal injunction, since that would require an actual customer and web designer.
Without an actual customer and web designed, then this appears to be a ruling that allows ALL discrimination, and that clearly can not possibly be legal.

The District Court had no problem finding the case. The Appellate Court had no problem identifying the case. The Supreme Court understood it perfectly. Don't you see it odd that you are the only one who doesn't understand the issues? Do you honestly think that you know better than 3 courts with judges law clerks, attorneys and paralegals? Only you.

It’s an injunction against the State. There doesn't need to be an actual customer.

The Court carved out an exception for expressive goods. Not all goods. Only those that require a unique, artistic, expression.

This can't be that hard to understand.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Totally and completely wrong.
Marxism essentially is employee own businesses.
It is collective, cooperative, and communal.
The workers are the owners, and have to democratically make decisions and share profits.
That is no state other then the workers, and it can't be a dictatorship if it is collective, cooperative, and communal.
Words have meaning.
You are trying to ignore the meaning of words.

Wrong

Marxism is state of collective owned businesses. It bans ALL private property you moron.

it is alwasy enocide slavery and poverty. It is never cooperative or communal

The workers are slaves

Yes it is a dictatorship always

Dictatorship of the proletariate means nothing but tyranny and DICTATORSHIP

 

[BS Filter]

Totally and completely wrong.
Marxism essentially is employee own businesses.
It is collective, cooperative, and communal.
The workers are the owners, and have to democratically make decisions and share profits.
That is no state other then the workers, and it can't be a dictatorship if it is collective, cooperative, and communal.
Words have meaning.
You are trying to ignore the meaning of words.

My business is not Marxist. I don't share profit with employees. I pay a wage.

 

[Rigby5]

She doesn't do same-sex websites. That's her right. Find someone who does. You're free to refuse to manufacture anything Christian in your business. Democracy.

No its not her right.
What is it about a gay wedding web site that would be remotely offensive to anyone?
Nothing.
No one has the right to refuse to manufacture anything Christian.

Actually we are a democracy republic, which means a constitution that prohibits abuse of the rights of others.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No its not her right.
What is it about a gay wedding web site that would be remotely offensive to anyone?
Nothing.
No one has the right to refuse to manufacture anything Christian.

Actually we are a democracy republic, which means a constitution that prohibits abuse of the rights of others.

Yes it is her right

Yes they do

It is you calling for abuse of the rights of others.

Forbidding the human right to discriminate is abusing their rights.

 

[BS Filter]

No its not her right.
What is it about a gay wedding web site that would be remotely offensive to anyone?
Nothing.
No one has the right to refuse to manufacture anything Christian.

Actually we are a democracy republic, which means a constitution that prohibits abuse of the rights of others.

It obviously is her right. Supreme Court said so. Accept reality.

 

[BS Filter]

No its not her right.
What is it about a gay wedding web site that would be remotely offensive to anyone?
Nothing.
No one has the right to refuse to manufacture anything Christian.

Actually we are a democracy republic, which means a constitution that prohibits abuse of the rights of others.

No, we are a Constitutional Republic.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong

Marxism is state of collective owned businesses. It bans ALL private property you moron.

it is alwasy enocide slavery and poverty. It is never cooperative or communal

The workers are slaves

Yes it is a dictatorship always

Dictatorship of the proletariate means nothing but tyranny and DICTATORSHIP

Wrong.
Marxism never even remotely considered effecting private property, like homes.
If it is not cooperative or communal, then it is not at all communism.
If the workers are slaves, its not communism.
Families, primitive tribes, religious orders, etc., are communist, but are never dictatorships or slavery.
So obviously you are wrong.

The meaning of "a dictatorship of the proletariat" just means there is only one class, and therefore egalitarian.
{...
Dictatorship of the proletariat is a Marxist concept that refers to a state in which the working class has control of political power123. It is a transitional phase between the abolition of capitalism and the establishment of communism, in which the previously dominant classes are repressed by the proletariat
...}

 

[Rigby5]

It obviously is her right. Supreme Court said so. Accept reality.

Wrong.
Since there was no real victim and no perpetrator, the case was deliberately fake and bogus.
Can't be used for any real example.
Nor would I ever accept such a ruling.
It would be time for pitchforks and torches.

 

[BS Filter]

Wrong.
Marxism never even remotely considered effecting private property, like homes.
If it is not cooperative or communal, then it is not at all communism.
If the workers are slaves, its not communism.
Families, primitive tribes, religious orders, etc., are communist, but are never dictatorships or slavery.
So obviously you are wrong.

The meaning of "a dictatorship of the proletariat" just means there is only one class, and therefore egalitarian.
{...
Dictatorship of the proletariat is a Marxist concept that refers to a state in which the working class has control of political power123. It is a transitional phase between the abolition of capitalism and the establishment of communism, in which the previously dominant classes are repressed by the proletariat
...}

Sounds good on paper and in theory. Where is it successful?

 

[BS Filter]

Wrong.
Since there was no real victim and no perpetrator, the case was deliberately fake and bogus.
Can't be used for any real example.
Nor would I ever accept such a ruling.
It would be time for pitchforks and torches.

You are accepting it. Nothing you can do about it.